• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Fyziks 101

No, you are an ineducable know-nothing. Mindless tinfoil-hatters are as plentiful as cockroaches.

lol

says the "amarican wannabe thinker" that judges religions based on a book he never readed himself.

you was on a TV show about Islam, and you had no clue about islam nor did you read the koran lol.
 
I find it funny that they use the 'squibs' to tell us that there are explosives detonating inside the towers yet massive portions of the core were still standing briefly after the main collapse in some of the same areas... After all... the interior support structure is the core...

I'm losing hope in turbofan learning anything here... this is becoming a soap opera...


Here's a perfect example of CD. Look at the structure standing straight up
at the 16 second mark.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_EdoxJam_gE

Watch how it descends STRAIGHT down in seconds!

See it again at 1:52

Keep spinning and denying.

Hey , what's the GL excuse for this anyway?

STRAIGHT! LMFAO!
 
Squib = tiny explosives.

Correct.

Let's plug that definition into your statements below:

Turbofan said:
I suggest you watch the videos and NOTICE the tiny explosives within the FIRST SECOND.

Turbofan said:
-You got it dude. Just like the tiny explosives show in the videos.

Were you saying that you actually see tiny explosives appearing/showing in these videos somewhere? (Or were you just mis-using that word?)
 
Here's a perfect example of CD. Look at the structure standing straight up
at the 16 second mark.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_EdoxJam_gE

Watch how it descends STRAIGHT down in seconds!

See it again at 1:52

Keep spinning and denying.

Hey , what's the GL excuse for this anyway?

STRAIGHT! LMFAO!


Hey Nicepants, I answered your question and you came back with another
without answering any of mine.

Will you please give an explanation of how the structure in the video linked
falls straight down?

Thanks
 
Your display of intellectual dishonesty and cowardice in this post is staggering.

You didn't even begin to address my question, and ignored the parts of it you found inconvenient.

Here it is again. Please pay special attention to the parts I've bolded:

If the collapse of the towers was so odd and in such violation of the laws of physics that a layperson such as yourself can perceive these oddities and violations merely by looking at photos of the collapse, then why hasn't any of this been discerned and/or revealed by a single MSM outlet, law enforcement agency, or investigative body on the planet?

Come on, Turbofan. Explain what special knowledge or insight you have that no single person in any of the above mentioned organizations seems to have. Why hasn't any investigative journalist or other professional investigator anywhere on the planet able to figure out what you did?


Bump. Because this is serious business.
 
Hey Nicepants, I answered your question and you came back with anotherwithout answering any of mine.

:dl::dl::dl:

What a hypocrite you are, Turbofan. You're too bloody scared to answer my question.
 
Will you please give an explanation of how the structure in the video linked
falls straight down?

Thanks

I started the thread. I asked the questions. You avoided them.

Answer post #1, or answer how the structure in the video is able to telescope
straight down.

This is an example of controlled demolition. If not, please explain otherwise.
 
Squib = tiny explosives. The jets of debris you see shooting out the buildings
are produced by squibs.
"tiny explosives"? Aren't you the guy who claims that the explosives were so powerful they sent steel weighing thousands of pounds several hundred feet away from the building? And in fact, they were so powerful that not a single ounce of material was present to cause the progressive collapse?

Why, yes you are!

I guess you don't study much, or watch the videos of first responders,
or testimony where people are stating they heard and felt bombs.

Here are a few to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39SuzYsK-9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFV0T_HLRuc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2A8VMg_B64



The debris that flew 350+ feet into WTC7 and cut through massive steel
support columns? Does that count too? Must have been some pretty strong
gravity to fly a football field away and THEN cut steel beams :rolleyes:

So your "squibs" did that, did they Turbofan? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Turbofan: Which direction does gravity pull?

You can't be serious? :eye-poppi

Are you saying that length of steel drove itself straight into the ground?

Is that how objects behave naturally?
 
Last edited:
Hey Nicepants, I answered your question and you came back with another
without answering any of mine.

Will you please give an explanation of how the structure in the video linked
falls straight down?

Thanks

I'm not able to see that video from here...but when something "falls straight down", it's usually because gravity is pulling it....straight down. *

*ETA: And it's unable to resist.
 
Last edited:
Your display of intellectual dishonesty and cowardice in this post is staggering.

You didn't even begin to address my question, and ignored the parts of it you found inconvenient.

Here it is again. Please pay special attention to the parts I've bolded:

If the collapse of the towers was so odd and in such violation of the laws of physics that a layperson such as yourself can perceive these oddities and violations merely by looking at photos of the collapse, then why hasn't any of this been discerned and/or revealed by a single MSM outlet, law enforcement agency, or investigative body on the planet?

Come on, Turbofan. Explain what special knowledge or insight you have that no single person in any of the above mentioned organizations seems to have. Why hasn't any investigative journalist or other professional investigator anywhere on the planet able to figure out what you did?

Did you miss this, TF?
 
I'm not able to see that video from here...but when something "falls straight down", it's usually because gravity is pulling it....straight down.

Nicepants:

Here's a summary of the video since you can't see it:

Imagine a steel beam sticking straight up in the air.

Now imagine that steel beam telescoping down (vertically, straight, etc.)
into the ground.

Is that acceptable to you based on gravity?

If the collapse of the towers was so odd and in such violation of the laws of physics that a layperson such as yourself can perceive these oddities and violations merely by looking at photos of the collapse, then why hasn't any of this been discerned and/or revealed by a single MSM outlet, law enforcement agency, or investigative body on the planet?

Oh geez, do I have to answer this again? It's been addressed already in
the other threads you keep following me through.

My answer (to the bold) is because they are not looking at the video
evidence shown. They refuse to broadcast it (WTC7, Pentagon, etc.).

When the truth movement tries to go public via MSM, they are rejected.
Nobody wants to answer our questions. Your president didn't even have
the decency to testify under oath, recorded, or have the families of the
victims present! He even needed his buddy Dick beside him! Nice cover up.

I've answered your question (again), so please answer mine.
 
What length of steel?

Come on?!

The one I pointed out at 16 seconds into the video.

Are you telling me you can't see it?

What's your explanation of this? How does it drive itself straight down
by gravity?

Are you guys going to wake up, and realize the mess your government
is pushing on you?
 
9 pages of argument from personal incredulity. When do we get to see the fyziks?
 
Come on?!

The one I pointed out at 16 seconds into the video.

Are you telling me you can't see it?

What's your explanation of this? How does it drive itself straight down
by gravity?

Are you guys going to wake up, and realize the mess your government
is pushing on you?

There was a single length of steel in the video? How did they manage to deliver that to the site?:boggled:
 
9 pages of argument from personal incredulity. When do we get to see the fyziks?

What's your take on the video?

Still waiting for an answer from everyone, especially

- uk_Dave
- R. Mackey
- Pomeroo
- Nicepants
- Wildcat
- bje
- Mr. Herbert
- Anti-sophist
- Beachnut
- Reheat

Stop dodging, start answering.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom