LightinDarkness
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 2,583
I decided to make a new thread on this because its pretty off topic from the other one. This is looking at the origins of FMOTL and its connections to terrorism and the "sovereign citizen" movement in the US.
The more I read about Freeman on the Land/Freeloading on the Land, the more I am becoming disturbed at how radical its "founding members" were. Freeman on the Land seems to be mostly originated from the UK, but its roots go back to the early 1990s with the "sovereign citizen" movement. I *think* someone has posted the ADL link before, I just can't remember who, but here is some background on the founding movement that gave birth to FMOTL:
http://www.adl.org/Learn/ext_us/SCM.asp?xpicked=4&item=20
Here are two parts of it that I had not noticed the last time I looked at it:
That Nicolas would be Terry Nicolas, the Oklahoma City bomber. Note that these are exactly the same methods used by current Freeman on the land people. The "fractional reserve check" has now morphed into them believing they can pay all their debts with a fictional bond they think the government has on their birth certificate, but the other rituals are the same.
The entire FMOTL obsession with common law and rejection of statute appears to go back all the way to the 1970s with a rural US movement (the "posse comitatus" movement) that rejected the legitimacy of the federal government as the highest form of government:
There is absolutely no difference from the above and current Freeman propaganda. It is AMAZING how these wingnut conspiracies form, die, and rise again from the ashes under a new name and even in a new country. It seems as though Freeman on the Land was brought over to the UK by propagandists of the sovereign citizen movement in the US:
The exact sort of thinking from the above quote is on the David Icke forum every single day. Same reasoning, same points, same tactics.
The more I read about Freeman on the Land/Freeloading on the Land, the more I am becoming disturbed at how radical its "founding members" were. Freeman on the Land seems to be mostly originated from the UK, but its roots go back to the early 1990s with the "sovereign citizen" movement. I *think* someone has posted the ADL link before, I just can't remember who, but here is some background on the founding movement that gave birth to FMOTL:
http://www.adl.org/Learn/ext_us/SCM.asp?xpicked=4&item=20
Here are two parts of it that I had not noticed the last time I looked at it:
Members of the sovereign citizen movement engage in a variety of seemingly bizarre activities. Nichols, for instance, several times repudiated his allegiance to federal and state governments. He tried to pay a credit card debt with a fictitious financial instrument called a "certified fractional reserve check." Brought into court in Michigan in 1993, he refused to walk to the front of the courtroom and denied the court's jurisdiction over him. Even when he wrote addresses on letters, Nichols made sure to use the abbreviation "TDC" to indicate that he was using the federal zip code under "threat, duress and coercion."
That Nicolas would be Terry Nicolas, the Oklahoma City bomber. Note that these are exactly the same methods used by current Freeman on the land people. The "fractional reserve check" has now morphed into them believing they can pay all their debts with a fictional bond they think the government has on their birth certificate, but the other rituals are the same.
The entire FMOTL obsession with common law and rejection of statute appears to go back all the way to the 1970s with a rural US movement (the "posse comitatus" movement) that rejected the legitimacy of the federal government as the highest form of government:
The Posse reached its peak in the early 1980s when a farm crisis in the Midwest allowed Posse leaders to recruit among angry and desperate farmers. By this time Posse ideology had developed into an elaborate theory involving an original, utopian form of government based upon "common law" (the "de jure" government) that had been subverted and replaced with an illegitimate, tyrannical government (the "de facto" government). Americans obeyed the de facto government, because they had been tricked into believing it was legitimate.
There is absolutely no difference from the above and current Freeman propaganda. It is AMAZING how these wingnut conspiracies form, die, and rise again from the ashes under a new name and even in a new country. It seems as though Freeman on the Land was brought over to the UK by propagandists of the sovereign citizen movement in the US:
But to become a citizen of the United States was to willingly subject oneself to the complete authority of the federal and state governments; clearly, no one would want to do this. The government, therefore, tricked people into entering into its jurisdiction and that of the "corporate" state government by having them sign contracts with it. The trick was that people did not even realize they were signing contracts: these included items like Social Security cards, drivers' licenses, car registrations, wedding licenses or even, as Terry Nichols noted, hunting licenses and zip codes.
The sovereign citizen solution to this problem is the one that Nichols used. Since these contracts were made without people's knowledge, they could be declared invalid and torn up. Social Security numbers, licenses and permits, even birth certificates could be revoked, allowing people thereby to become "sovereign citizens," freed from the jurisdiction of the "de facto" government and courts. They were once more subject only to the "common law."
The exact sort of thinking from the above quote is on the David Icke forum every single day. Same reasoning, same points, same tactics.
Last edited: