• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Franko and Deism.org

Franko said:

Essentially he is claiming that 2 + 2 = 5 and without saying anythig else he wants me to PROVE why he is wrong. He's just ... a Fool!

From his questions, I was under the impression that he wanted you to PROVE why you are right.

However, before saying anything else, I will wait for your direct responses to CWL's direct questions. I am also preparing a list of my own very specific questions to ask you.
 
Trixy,

How can you "deliberately" do anything when you have no free will?

Well if you were Fated to do it, then how was it “free will”?

Just tell us all, are you claiming:

That Atoms DO NOT obey the laws of Physics?

… or …

That You ARE NOT made of atoms?

You have no evidence for “free will”, and what you are trying to claim as far as NO EVIDENCE for God is that when you drive your car, You (the thing controlling) is less conscious then your car (the thing controlled).

Are you going to explain that contradiction to us? Or are you and your pathetic little toadies gonna just go and cry to Randi about me again?
 
Did I NOT prove you to be the fool that you are?

Is it safe to assume that you are too embaressed to respond?

Poor foolish Franko

Upchurch
 
Franko said:
Trixy,



Well if you were Fated to do it, then how was it “free will”?

Just tell us all, are you claiming:

That Atoms DO NOT obey the laws of Physics?

… or …

That You ARE NOT made of atoms?

You have no evidence for “free will”, and what you are trying to claim as far as NO EVIDENCE for God is that when you drive your car, You (the thing controlling) is less conscious then your car (the thing controlled).

Are you going to explain that contradiction to us? Or are you and your pathetic little toadies gonna just go and cry to Randi about me again?
LOL. Cover your backside, little boy. You're obviously in retreat. Here is the essence of what you have claimed.

1) You cannot choose anything.
2) If you choose the wrong thing you will suffer.

You can repeat your nonsense until you die, but it will not disguise the fact that you have been caught in a logical contradiction. And you are the person who claims their religion is based on logic. You really are a hoot.

Now. Do you want to change either of your answers to my previous questions? (Still try to confine it to yes or no, please).
 
Franko said:
Well if you were Fated to do it, then how was it ?free will??
Oh, I see. Franko doesn't understand that without free will, punishement (even port mortum) for an action that someone had no control over is unjust.

It looks like Franko's Illogical Goddess (because of the negative spin, ya understand) is an unjust goddess who punishes us for things we have no control over. I guess that makes sense, her being an illogical goddess.

Upchurch

edited to add:
I take it back. Franko may very well understand that without free will punishment is unjust. He may just be perfectly fine with believing in a un unjust goddess who deals out punishment for no good reason.
 
Upchuck,

This is Upbelch’s response to why people who believe in no ultimate consequences (i.e. devout Atheists) are more moral then people who do believe in ultimate consequences (i.e. devout Theists) …

Regardless, what I find hysterical is that you berate others for their reading comprehension when yours is so poor. Could you please point to where I said that there are no consequences to our actions? I said no such thing, did I Franko?

Do you, or do you not claim that you (We) will cease to exist when we die?

Once you have ceased to exist what are the ramifications of your past actions?

Are you seriously this retarded?

No, my position is that there are no consequences to our actions due to a supernatural power. I believe that there are all sorts of consequences to every one of our actions.

So if you find out that you have only 6 months to live, and you charge up all of your credit cards to the max, and borrow money from all of your friends (anyone who will lend you a dime), then what are the consequences according to you if you die without repaying the money.

What logical reason have you given us to believe that you would NOT behave exactly like this in the scenario described above?

If you found out that you only had weeks to live, and there was someone (or more that one) that you wanted to kill, why wouldn’t you kill them? If you only have a few weeks left to live, how bad is “Life in Prison” gonna be? You probably wouldn’t even make it through the trial.

As a variation of what Blue Monk said, I don't hurt people, because I do not wish to be hurt. I do not steal from people because I do not want my things stolen. etc. There is no need for supernatural punishment to be a moral person, Franko.

I never mentioned supernatural punishment. If you want to argue a strawman, I suggest you find some other idiot A-Theist who will appreciate one. I am arguing that in your mind, if you can steal from me with the reasonable expectation o NOT being caught in your lifetime then I see no reason to believe that you would NOT do just that. In your mind you certainly won’t have to face any consequences for your action.

Further, I never said that I thought atheists were more moral than theists, unless you can show where I did? I was just remarking at how weak your moral basis must be if it is only based on punishment after death. It's my opinion.

Actually you and all of the other A-Theists have implied JUST that, but to be honest you aren’t worth my time to go digging through multiple threads, and many posts. If you don’t care about being honest with yourself, then that is YOUR problem far more than it is mine.

But I this entire post is just a rehash of questions I have asked you (and others here) Time and Time again. I have no doubt you will ignore this post, and resume with your typical modus operandi. … But that’s okay … you are doing exactly what I predict you will do, and you are doing exactly what I want you to do. You are an extremely easy entity to manipulate.

The fact remains all moral crime – all EVIL – is committed by entities which believe that there are NO ultimate consequences for their actions. You are living proof of this statement. You couldn’t be honest – to save your own existence!

if there are more ways that you know of that I can demonstrate you to be the fool you are, don't you hesitate to bring them up.

You are a wretched little beast. I’m done with you. I’ll actually enjoy watching you fry.
 
----
Spin = gender?

LMAO

I'm afraid to ask what the rest of them mean!

Good work there, Fool. I was skeptical there for a minute until the "Graviton" bit. That pretty much settled the issue for me.
----


heheehhe!!

Yeah, Fran, the Illogical Deist is substituting Christian terms with terms that he likes, but it is still the same ol' dogma. To try and provide a reason that his Illogical God is female, he says calls God "gravy-train" and then says that she is she because of spin!

heheheh!!

Wow! All those times when I played with a top, I was really making out and I didn't know it! hehehe!!! Such is Franko's logic.

I wonder what gender my washing machine or my fan are? "Hey record player, you are looking mighty fine today. Wanna go on a date?" Franko probably does this!

Hehehe...


Please don't "woupp" my ass Frank-O-I-guess-my-God-is-a-she! I wouldn't want you to break your press-on nails.

I love these religious fanatics, especially when they claim to be detached from dogma. A Logical Dogma-ist perhaps?

Hehehehe...

The Void will get us, ooooooohhh the Boogeyman too?

Heheheheheh...
 
It looks like Franko's Illogical Goddess (because of the negative spin, ya understand) is an unjust goddess who punishes us for things we have no control over. I guess that makes sense, her being an illogical goddess.

retard!!!

Some guy knocks on your door. You invite him in for a moment so you can talk. He sees your wife, and immediately starts punching him in the face.

Do you care what the reason is the guy is beating up your wife? Or are you just getting him outta there as fast as possible?

Are you gonna let him back in tomorrow?

What if its just that he had a really rotten childhood? Or maybe he just had a rough day at work, and your wife looked like his boss?

Do you really care? The ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ just insane. What difference does the "why" really make?
 
Frank-0 for effort, scribbled:

----
You are a wretched little beast. I’m done with you. I’ll actually enjoy watching you fry.
----


This is a Illogical De-isn't-ist at their best!

Apparently nothing separates him from a fundamental hellfire (but now it is the Void you see, hehehehe...) Christian or a fundamental Muslim.

So much for his Goddess! Hehehe... I guess his gravy-train stopped spinning?

Stank, I'm off to ask my tires out for a date!

Hehehehe...
 
Franko said:
You are a wretched little beast. I?m done with you. I?ll actually enjoy watching you fry.

I'll take that to mean I won your little "Make me look like a fool" challenge, Franko. Pleasure doin' business with ya.

You may now continue to dance like a fool to entertain me and others, monkey boy.

Upchurch
 
Franko said:
... I am arguing that in your mind, if you can steal from me with the reasonable expectation o NOT being caught in your lifetime then I see no reason to believe that you would NOT do just that. In your mind you certainly won’t have to face any consequences for your action.

Franko,

Let me make sure I understand exactly what you are saying. Is it your contention that without a supreme being, there is no reason to be moral? And no one would be? The only reason we don't live in a Hobbsean world is God?

thanks
 
Bidlack,

Let me make sure I understand exactly what you are saying. Is it your contention that without a supreme being, there is no reason to be moral? And no one would be? The only reason we don't live in a Hobbsean world is God?

No, no, not at all. I have mentioned in several of the other threads, God is just the ultimate judge and enforcer of Karma. But Karma itself (relativity) is the reason that people are moral. Essentially it is the idea (the notion) that all of your actions create feedback, and eventually that feedback returns to its source (magnified over time actually).
 
Okay folks ….

Check this out for prophesy … lets see how I do when I telegraph my moves …

I predict, that every single time I make a post that Whodini, Upchurch, or Diogenes will post some fluff (or an insult) within 5 minutes. Actually I am controlling their minds, and making them do it. Lets see if they can resist my power?

(In addition to the three I mentioned, evildave, and Trixy, use to also be under my spell, but they seem to have broken its power for the moment)
 
Franko said:
Okay folks ….

Check this out for prophesy … lets see how I do when I telegraph my moves …

I predict, that every single time I make a post that Whodini, Upchurch, or Diogenes will post some fluff (or an insult) within 5 minutes. Actually I am controlling their minds, and making them do it. Lets see if they can resist my power?

Since they haven't done this so far, what makes you think they're going to start? :D
 
Franko said:
Plutard,

You really are retarded (plutarded). Hehehe …

So … what … is this your feeble way of getting back at me for consistently woupping your ass? You are getting to be as bad as Upchurch and Whodini. But that’s okay, I love watching you A-Theists embarrass yourself. I couldn’t pay you guys to act like bigger religious fanatics.

Holy ◊◊◊◊, I actually thought Whodini was responding to me.

I propose that we elect Whodini the official Franko-O-Later 2002. That was an incredibly good impression, right down to the punctuation!


Ultimately, you really are dellusional if you think you've ever come close to winning an argument with me. You've never even managed to make a single point, precisely because the only debating tactics you are capable of for any reasonable period of time are misrepresentation, equivocation, and ignoring what people say with ad-hominem sprinkled throughout.

You do actually argue properly at times, but due to your silly beliefs and your insistance on telling other poeple what they believe you quickly run into a brick wall. So you ignore what people say and misrepresent their positions. When you're proven wrong you change the definition or words to whatever suits you at the moment, decide what people really believe, and attempt to insult them by misspelling their name (which bothers nearly no one).

How sad is it that Whodini is doing a better job of being you than you ever have?

You, Franko, are both irrelevant and rediculous. Your views, Franko, are both irrelevant and rediculous. We will now get back to laughing at the True Franko - Whodini. Maybe if we're feeling really generous, between yucks, we'll feel a little pitty for poor, sad, delusional Franko.

Of course, when we're done we'll go back to laughing at your expense, just like usual.
 
Franko said:
Okay folks ….

Check this out for prophesy … lets see how I do when I telegraph my moves …

I predict, that every single time I make a post that Whodini, Upchurch, or Diogenes will post some fluff (or an insult) within 5 minutes. Actually I am controlling their minds, and making them do it. Lets see if they can resist my power?

(In addition to the three I mentioned, evildave, and Trixy, use to also be under my spell, but they seem to have broken its power for the moment)
Oh don't worry, my little juvenile delinquent. I've been a bit busy in the Flame War section. I'll have more time to ridicule you soon.

I suppose I should thank you. It was my practice in writing chapter one and chapter two of your life story that prepared me for the Flame War.

So be patient, buttercup. I'll have more time to spend with you soon.
 
Plutard,

You, Franko, are both irrelevant and rediculous. Your views, Franko, are both irrelevant and rediculous. We will now get back to laughing at the True Franko - Whodini. Maybe if we're feeling really generous, between yucks, we'll feel a little pitty for poor, sad, delusional Franko.

Hah!!!

If you really meant this you would demonstrate it by never speaking to me again. But like all A-Theists you are full of ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ at heart.

In my last post I should have said Upchurch, Whodini, Diogenes, or Plutarch ... pathetic losers ...
 
Since they haven't done this so far, what makes you think they're going to start?

slide back up this thread (or any other) and see for yourself ...

I post 2:55 pm
Upchurch posts 2:59 pm

I post 3:10 pm
whodidni 3:11 pm

I post 3:13 pm

Upchurch 3:16pm
Whodidni 3:16 pm

Thats within 5 minutes ... go back and check the first page of the thread as well ...
 
What the hell, this might be fun.

Franko said:
Do you, or do you not claim that you (We) will cease to exist when we die?

I do not claim that we cease to exist when we die. I believe we exist still in the genetics of our children and in the memory of those who knew us when we were alive. I believe that or actions have reprocussions on those that follow us that I am responsible for. I do not, however, believe that I will personally continue to generate new thoughts or have new experiences once I am dead.

Once you have ceased to exist what are the ramifications of your past actions?
The ramifications will be demonstrated in the beliefs, conditions and actions of those who follow me. If I have done less for them than I might have, I will be remembered poorly. If I have done everything for them that I possibly could have, I will be remembered as a good man (hopefully).

Are you seriously this retarded?
I don't see anything retarded about my beliefs about consequences, Franko.

So if you find out that you have only 6 months to live, and you charge up all of your credit cards to the max, and borrow money from all of your friends (anyone who will lend you a dime), then what are the consequences according to you if you die without repaying the money.
The consequences, as I stated above, is that of having failed those who follow after me. That of hurting my family and friends and of making their lives worse, not better, for having been here. I would be hated and mocked by those I had cared most for and I would not be remembered well.

What logical reason have you given us to believe that you would NOT behave exactly like this in the scenario described above?
There is no logical reason, Franko. It is an emotional one. I want to be remembered well by my friends and family. I want to have systems in place where my children and their children work for fun and the challenge of it and don't have to work for a living. If you are looking for a logical reason, I suppose I can give you two. 1) I owe to those who came before me and 2) I owe to those who come after me.

If you found out that you only had weeks to live, and there was someone (or more that one) that you wanted to kill, why wouldn?t you kill them? If you only have a few weeks left to live, how bad is ?Life in Prison? gonna be? You probably wouldn?t even make it through the trial.
How about to present a good example? To continualy strive to be the best person I can be, even in the face of death. Killing said person will not change my situation. It won't make life easier for those who follow me. If killing someone is the only solution I can come up with to fixing a problem, then there is more wrong with me than my eminent demise.

I never mentioned supernatural punishment.
No? When you said you would enjoy watching me fry, what did you mean by that, exactly? When you talk about your goddess punishing/rewarding people, what did you mean?

I am arguing that in your mind, if you can steal from me with the reasonable expectation o NOT being caught in your lifetime then I see no reason to believe that you would NOT do just that.
Then you obviously do not know me.
In your mind you certainly won?t have to face any consequences for your action.
I think I've given you many examples of the kinds of consequences I feel my actions would have. Will I personally face them once I am dead? No, but those that follow me, my children, my family, my friends will. I will not be a burden like that to them.

But I this entire post is just a rehash of questions I have asked you (and others here) Time and Time again. I have no doubt you will ignore this post, and resume with your typical modus operandi. ? But that?s okay ? you are doing exactly what I predict you will do, and you are doing exactly what I want you to do. You are an extremely easy entity to manipulate.
Is that so. Have I not just given you a very honest answer to each of your questions? Are you honest enough to respect and acknowledge that I have answered your questions?

The fact remains all moral crime ? all EVIL ? is committed by entities which believe that there are NO ultimate consequences for their actions. You are living proof of this statement. You couldn?t be honest ? to save your own existence!
You don't know me, Franko. I feel that you know even less about the world around you. I am open-minded enough to challenge my own view point and honest enough to acknowledge when I'm wrong. When I can't, that is evil, Franko. When one cannot be sorry for when one has made a mistake, that is evil. Be careful about throwing the first stone.

Upchurch
edited because I wrote just too darn fast
 

Back
Top Bottom