Kotatsu
Phthirapterist
Tripods sure beat monopods if you're also going to use the same one for a telescope, though.
Actually that is quite funny. A "professional" that eschews a tripod for handheld and prefers zoom lenses to prime? In his case a prime 100mm, 400mm and 600mm would have been a more informed opinion than using a teleconverter.How do you think I felt when I got to the Eagles's nest on Honeymoon Island and the professional bird photographer looked at my gear and scoffed, saying, they should shoot whoever sells that tripod, and I thought it was a pretty good tripod.
He then proceeded to tell me that I should never use a tripod, I should replace the 300mm lens I have with a 100-400 and 1.4x coverter, then I might have a chance. His thick German accent is burned into my memory, "learn panning technique, tripod is s***!"
I didn't take it personally, I thought it was funny and very informative.
That's your opinion.I'm learning that there are as many opinions as there are photographers.
Oh, yeah. I was talking about the "ideal" situation, of course. About the only time you'd have opportunity like that would be staking out a nest, roost or feeding site behind a hide (blind to Merkins), but that said, most of my birding shots have been with the focal length set at max, i.e. 300mm with 2X teleconverter. Given that experience (and it would depend on where your shooting, really) I would kill to be able to afford a prime 500 or 600mm lens for birding. As it is, a zoom lens is the most practical and versatile for amateur wildlife photographers, and quite a number of professionals.Perhaps I'm not experienced enough but I can't imagine shooting birds with a prime lens. They fly all over the place, and most don't sit for very long in one spot.

That's your opinion.
Yeah, I spent quite a few years on birding and photography usenet groups and the advice I took away from that was mostly based on the track record of the poster. You can usually spot opinion over experience any day. Biggest thing to remember is a professional is merely someone who gets paid for it. Think of all the foolish opinions you hear from your cow orkers, and then remember, by definition, they are professionals.
That said, there are quite a number of wildlife photography sites on the web that CAN be relied upon for accurate and well balanced opinions on technique, gear and approach. I'm not at home for a week or so, but will try to look up the favourites that I've saved from the past.Oh, yeah. I was talking about the "ideal" situation, of course. About the only time you'd have opportunity like that would be staking out a nest, roost or feeding site behind a hide (blind to Merkins), but that said, most of my birding shots have been with the focal length set at max, i.e. 300mm with 2X teleconverter. Given that experience (and it would depend on where your shooting, really) I would kill to be able to afford a prime 500 or 600mm lens for birding. As it is, a zoom lens is the most practical and versatile for amateur wildlife photographers, and quite a number of professionals.
IMO![]()
Well, the fact that you are adding a couple of more lens elements will have some effect on the image, but if you buy quality glass, as with any lens, you and I won't be able to notice any quality loss.That's great info, and if you'd like to post those links, I'd appreciate it. The 2X converter is a cheaper option for me, but I was under the impression that it would affect the quality of the image. I'm also curious what the compability issues are as I'm not using a Canon lens, but a Tamron 28-300 3.5-6.3
I will give you a full list as soon as I get home, but in the meantime:
Tak Thale, 30/11 2008:
SPOONBILLED SANDPIPER!!!!!!
Muahahahahahahaha.
[grits teeth] I'm glad it went so well. [/grits teeth]![]()
Having Phil Round as your guide must have been superb - I don't know how many notes I've got saying "swiftlet (sp.)" or "pipit (sp.)", having someone explain how to ID the little blighters in the field would be excellent!

I reported earlier the sighting of a snowy owl here. Fortunately, it seems that in addition to being diurnal, they are also pretty reliable in their rounds. So anyway, here is a photograph taken on the third sighting of the snowy owl which is hanging around Whiting, VT. It's a low res scan from the processor (good old fashioned fillum). I haven't gotten around yet to doing a better scan. For the camera geeks, it's a crop of a shot on Fuji Superia 400, taken with a Nikon F, Nikkor 400/5.6 lens with 1.4x converter. View attachment 12508
Does anyone know if this is a broadwinged Hawk? Although not very common in Florida, they do winter here.
It's Summer down here, but I'm in training and I cannot take my gear along. I have a holiday at Sandy Point coming up soon but I doubt I'm going to see any birds not already posted here. If I do I will post them.