Foreknowledge to the OKC bombing.

[Revolutionary91]

and you have your mountain of eveidence stashed where again? You're equating someone with a concealed weapon permit who goes to eat at a Luby's Cafeteria 10 minutes before a crazed gunman goes berzerk in the middle of the desert aisle.

No, he claims he went there to investigate the bombing.

 

[Par]

Do you admit that his early arrival and subsequent lies are suspicious?

This is a question begging question. It presupposes he had foreknowledge of the bombing.

 

[Unsecured Coins]

No, he claims he went there to investigate the bombing.

source?

 

[Revolutionary91]

Do you know that he was not in Texas? Maybe his aid was in OKC.

So his aide had foreknowledge of the bombing. Either way you cut it, there was foreknowledge.

FatesWebb we have clearly proven foreknowledge, you may as well his them with the other stuff.

 

[Foster Zygote]

Srcond time of asking.

Can a skeptic please explain why the terrorism task force leader booked in to his hotel in Oklahoma 9 hours before the bombing but then claimed he was in Texas?

Could you provide a source for this?

 

[Revolutionary91]

This is a question begging question. It presupposes he had foreknowledge of the bombing.

Fact: He booked in 9 hours before the bombing.

Fact: He lied and said he was in texas and went to OKC after the bombing.

Proved.

 

[Par]

So his aide had foreknowledge of the bombing. Either way you cut it, there was foreknowledge.

FatesWebb we have clearly proven foreknowledge, you may as well his them with the other stuff.

False dichotomy; non sequitur.

 

[Revolutionary91]

Could you provide a source for this?

Already did.

 

[Pardalis]

Fact: He booked in 9 hours before the bombing.

Fact: He lied and said he was in texas and went to OKC after the bombing.

Proved.

link?

 

[Par]

Fact: He booked in 9 hours before the bombing.

Fact: He lied and said he was in texas and went to OKC after the bombing.

Proved.

None of that (even if true) addresses the fact that your question was a question begging one. It presupposes he had foreknowledge of the bombing.

 

[JimBenArm]

Fact: He booked in 9 hours before the bombing.

Fact: He lied and said he was in texas and went to OKC after the bombing.

Proved.

Fact: You provide not a shred of documentation for this.
Fact: You have no idea what actual evidence is, confusing it with supposition.

Not proven.

 

[Sabrina]

I think Fates may have realized that his truck photograph is not as damning as he thought and will henceforth ignore my response, as he has not replied, and will move on to yet another futile argument.

Am I psychic? Stay tuned and find out!

 

[~enigma~]

thats real nice, calling people names/insulting people...

people died in this murder, if you aren't going to take it seriously then go away. we are having an adult conversation. insults do not have a place in it.

And your claim of government foreknowledge that you have proof for yet you show nothing isn't insulting to everybody here, disrespectful to those that died in oKC and just plain stupid? This is where KT would say pot meet kettle..,.

 

[Drudgewire]

Fact: He booked in 9 hours before the bombing.

Fact: He lied and said he was in texas and went to OKC after the bombing.

Proved.

Oooooh, now I see how this is different from the other times in this thread people have asked you to back up your claims with proof.

This time you put "Fact" at the front of the sentences.

 

[Revolutionary91]

Heres the reciept.

Foreknowledge is proven.

 

[Unsecured Coins]

I think Fates may have realized that his truck photograph is not as damning as he thought and will henceforth ignore my response, as he has not replied, and will move on to yet another futile argument.

Am I psychic? Stay tuned and find out!

screw that, I'm going to lunch

 

[DavidJames]

thats real nice, calling people names/insulting people...

people died in this murder, if you aren't going to take it seriously then go away. we are having an adult conversation. insults do not have a place in it.

Listen Sparky, you are the ones not taking this seriously. You claim to have evidence of the US govt. being involved in mass murder and what are you doing about it. You are posting on an Internet forum! Why aren’t you banging down the doors of the media? Why aren’t you engaging lawyers? Why aren’t you contacting the police or DA, or insurance fraud organizations. Why are you purposefully keeping your evidence from the authorities.

It is YOU, my friend, who aren’t taking this seriously.

Now, act like an adult and actually try and do something with your evidence.

 

[Par]

Heres the reciept.

Foreknowledge is proven.

[qimg]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/PD/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.jpg[/qimg][qimg]http://wnd.com/images2/motelreceipt.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/PD/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-3.jpg[/qimg]

Wrong. You’re claiming that either he wasn’t in Oklahoma before the bombing (and didn’t lie about his whereabouts) or he had foreknowledge of the bombing. This is an example of the false dichotomy fallacy.

 

[DavidJames]

If a member of your family was murdered at home, would you be concerned if you found out the homicide detectives had turned up 9 hours before the murder?

If a member of your family was murdered at home, would you be concerned that people who claim to know who the real killers were didn’t do squat except post none stop on Internet forums?

 

[~enigma~]

Have you considered the possibility that your question has been answered by someone you currently have on your ignore list?

Anything Rev asks should not be answered by anybody except those on his red list...i mean ignore list...and only then if they choose to answer. Most of his questions are leading bs anyway.