Foreknowledge to the OKC bombing.

As for the "other explosion" Wikipedia has this

Conspiracists have also said seismic recordings of the event were indicative of multiple bombs. This contention was refuted by U.S. Geological Survey and Oklahoma Geological Survey scientists, who recorded and analyzed seismic signals from the demolition of the Murrah building. These demolition seismograms showed that the two pulses of energy recorded in Norman, OK from the bombing were due to the seismic response of the Earth rather than to multiple blast sources.[86]
Click to expand...
# ^ Dietel, C., Digital seismic recordings of the May 23, 1995, demolition of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USGS Open File Report 95-594, 1995.
 
FatesWebb said:
...we are having an adult conversation....
Click to expand...

No, you aren’t having an adult conversation. (I don’t think it’s possible to have a conversation on an internet forum, but never mind.) What’s happening is that a number of posters are reasoning with you, and you’re resisting them.

Not everyone is using reason; some, like me, are just ridiculing you. Now why would that be? Why do you meet with mockery when you post your ideas? Why do the grownups make fun of you and Rev? Could it be that you are in fact ridiculous? Could it be that you’ve bought a stupid line of conspiricist fantasy? Could it be that you’re wrong?

Try to ask yourself those questions. Try to answer them too.
 
I am always amazed that CTers take speculation and coincidence as Fact.

It really takes a deficiency in education to make that illogical step to prove your point. Either that, or they know they're full of it, but want to rope in uneducated suckers.
 
Viper Daimao said:
As for the "other explosion" Wikipedia has this


# ^ Dietel, C., Digital seismic recordings of the May 23, 1995, demolition of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USGS Open File Report 95-594, 1995.
Click to expand...

[truther squirrel logic]Duhhhh The USGS was in on it and faked the seismic readings! Wake Up! [/truther squirrel logic]
 
The Pig said:
If you checked into a hotel at 00:20 on the 19th, and checked out at 11:16 on the 27th, you'd pay for 9 nights, not the 8 paid for on this bill.
Click to expand...

Wow, you're right. I should have looked at the bill more closely. I don't know how Embassy Suites does their billing, but every hotel bill that I can remember lists the date of the charge as the date that the night begins on. This means that the first night reflected on that bill would be the night of the 19th-20th. Any CT'ers care to explain this?
 
Revolutionary91 said:
No, an article based on a reciept proving he arrived 9 hours before the bombing. This reciept:

http://wnd.com/images2/motelreceipt.jpg

What does the age of the article matter? What does the follow up matter?

Are you using the ridiculous "press don;t report it so it didnt happen" argument?
Click to expand...
I'd like to come out of
'lurker mode" to point out a couple of things concerning this receipt.

1) There is no year stated on this receipt. (unless I'm just simply not seeing it)

2) The receipt is unsigned. (I've traveled on expense accounts enough to know that I require a signed receipt to facilitate reimbursement of said expenses)
 
why are we indulging the mindless claims by these two members? you know they are trolls. You know all theri claims have been debunked in earlier threads.

what happened to "ignore them and they'll leave?"


stop. please stop.

The OKC bombings were dealt with and already linked to. It should end with that.
 
I posted the following on another thread. It belongs here:

9/11 fantasists have picked up the bad habit of pretending that the Oklahoma City bombing was a "false flag" attack. It was not. Period.

Don't miss the Discovery-Times channel show, "Conspiracy Test." It nails down this myth definitively.
 
Revolutionary91 said:
He wasn't Joe Public, he was the FBIs head of terrorism. Is there any coincidence you wont believe in.

After he lied, the FBI said he was actually there on a secret investigation, further conradicting him.
Click to expand...
Where the agent was at any given time is irrelevant as proof of government fore-knowledge of any details of the crime.

There is ample reason to believe that the government knew ahead of time that SOMETHING was going to happen on that day. A major figure in Christian Identity, from Elohim City, was being put to death for murder that day. (You don't really believe it had anything to do with Waco, did you?)

John Trochmann made all sorts of noise about what an unfortunate day it would be for the government.

So, yes, it is likely that the FBI would be around that day. This also explains why the BATF agents were not wiped out. They were out trying to figure out what target Trochmann would strike. Probably didn't figure the Murrah Building was important enough. Oopsy!

As for the "secondary devices," that the bomb squad came in in full gear proves bugger-all. You treat EVERY bomb-like device in a bombed-out building as a live bomb.

Think about it a minute. The BATF stores evidence in bomb-related cases. They sometimes have training aids about the office that, to all appearnaces are bombs. Don't hand me any blather about the requirement to mark them as inert. How clear do you expect the markings on a device to be after being involved in a very dirt blast?

Have you noticed that I have alleged that twoofers may actually be white nationalists? What theme does this thread suggest to you? All the conspiracy sites I see paint the government as evil, and the white nationalist heroes whom the government PROsecutes are actually being PERsecuted.

Do you get where I'm going here?

And the only book that is relevant to the crime is The Turner Diaries. We have an exact match here, in the time that the bomb was set off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom