Flyover Witnesses

[WildCat]

Like this? By George, I do believe I've got it!

Yes, you do!

But, how do I handle multiple quotes?

Like this:

[quote=posterX]Here is the first quote.[/quote]
This is your reply.

[quote]This is the second quote.[/quote]
Here is your second reply.

Hope this helps!

 

[pomeroo]

Yes, you do!


Like this:


This is your reply.


Here is your second reply.

Hope this helps!

Many thanks, one and all! Yes, I really am a dunce. In my defense, I'd like to mention that one of my closest friends has dubbed me, "The World's Smartest Dope."

One remaining question: All of this is so simple that I'm left wondering what the Quote and Multi-Quote buttons actually do.

 

[Pardalis]

You gotta love the JREF forums.

 

[pomeroo]

You gotta love the JREF forums.

Hey, I'm trying to derail my own thread here!

 

[pomeroo]

Lapman List Update

Lapman List Update: 105 posts into the thread, the number of witnesses produced by Lyte Trip for his imaginary flyover--ZERO

"The party's over,
It's time to break the balloons..."

 

[Par]

One remaining question: All of this is so simple that I'm left wondering what the Quote and Multi-Quote buttons actually do.

The Quote button does what you’ve just mastered (I thought that’s how you’d been doing it!) Multi-quote is a toggle button (when you click it, it turns red); click Multi-Quote on any posts you want to quote and they will all be included when you click the Quote button.

 

[pomeroo]

The Quote button does what you’ve just mastered (I thought that’s how you’d been doing it!) Multi-quote is a toggle button (when you click it, it turns red); click Multi-Quote on any posts you want to quote and they will all be included when you click the Quote button.

But, I didn't touch the Quote button just now when I responded to you.

 

[Hokulele]

Many thanks, one and all! Yes, I really am a dunce. In my defense, I'd like to mention that one of my closest friends has dubbed me, "The World's Smartest Dope."

One remaining question: All of this is so simple that I'm left wondering what the Quote and Multi-Quote buttons actually do.

The Quote button should be used when you want to respond to one post by one person. It will look like this post. (Next post will be the mult-quote.)

 

[Hokulele]

The Quote button does what you’ve just mastered (I thought that’s how you’d been doing it!) Multi-quote is a toggle button (when you click it, it turns red); click Multi-Quote on any posts you want to quote and they will all be included when you click the Quote button.

But, I didn't touch the Quote button just now when I responded to you.

Multi-quote is what I am doing right now. I clicked the " button in Par's post, the " button in your post, then the Post Reply button at the very bottom of the thread. It looks like this.

(Par beat me to the first part.)

 

[boloboffin]

Now I know how the MultiQuote works. Yay!

I would like to put out the call for an uncompressed Citgo video again. I've been watching this clip over and over:

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

To my eyes, Lagasse is not reacting to anything until the impact explosion. It makes it seem he's not even facing the north, because it looks like he's swinging around to the south.

 

[pomeroo]

Multi-quote is what I am doing right now. I clicked the " button in Par's post, the " button in your post, then the Post Reply button at the very bottom of the thread. It looks like this.

(Par beat me to the first part.)

Here's how dumb I am: I don't mean the Quote button at all. Of course I click on the Quote button. I'm talking about that dialogue-balloon thingy that appears to the right of the Insert Image box. I had been wrapping my quoted material with unnecessary brackets.

This is a classic example of how people do stupid things over and over. I was always so eager to post my comments that I just never paused long enough to think through the problem I was having.

 

[e^n]

Lapman List Update: 105 posts into the thread, the number of witnesses produced by Lyte Trip for his imaginary flyover--ZERO

While I do not believe Lyte's theories in the least, I'd like to ask him a somewhat related question. My third post here (on any Conspiracy related forum I think) was to ask Lyte to clarify the flight path he believes AA77 took, this was his response:



So Lyte, I ask you this question: Can you find a published witness account or any statement which mentions the plane banking in either direction in accordance with your flightpath? I am also interested in working out just how severe of a turn this would be and whether it's feasible. I think I understand the calculations involved but would prefer someone more knowledgeable to conduct them.

edit:

Here's how dumb I am: I don't mean the Quote button at all. Of course I click on the Quote button. I'm talking about that dialogue-balloon thingy that appears to the right of the Insert Image box. I had been wrapping my quoted material with unnecessary brackets.

You'd be surprised how computers affect people in this way, my mother started off using punch cards and was quite highly paid to write COBOL for mainframe systems, put her in front of a modern PC though and all logic appears to go out of the window. I imagine there have been studies done on this.

 

[Hokulele]

I was always so eager to post my comments that I just never paused long enough to think through the problem I was having.

And I am sure everyone is always as eager to read your comments (especially Ace).

 

[twinstead]

I'm still trying to figure out how the Man would go through all the trouble of planting evidence a certain way and coaching all the witness 'plants', and then fly the plane on the wrong flight path.

oops. I'm sure some black ops commander lost his job over that one...

 

[nicepants]

Yes well he figured that out AFTER he flew closer to the building but he claims that he did NOT initially see this happening and the legitimate accounts of the c-130 (i.e. Scott Cook) have him coming into the scene about a 60 seconds later.

Steve O'brien did NOT "shadow" the AA jet or see it hit the building.

1 - What source are you quoting?

2 - I never suggested he shadowed it, your witness did. Obviously this is wrong since the C130 came from a different direction (see images below)

3 - The C130 pilot, did see A77 banking PRIOR to impact. At that point, the plane was at his 12 o'clock. (See images below)

 

[beachnut]

You aren't really this clueless are you?

Please tell me this is an act.

All your witnesses, everyone said something else in 2001 that make your new stuff false. You are a fraud and too easy to prove. I saw on your very own video, you changing testimony and drawing a line the guy could not see. Your witnesses saw and said they say in 2001 flight 77 hit the pentagon, it is on tape. I have one of your witnesses say he saw flight 77 in 2001 hit the light posts, and this is on tape in 2001.

Fraud is what you are doing to sell false information to real dumb guys. You are not clueless, you are a fraud, a modern snake oil salesman, but now it is fictional videos with false information.

 

[Reality Believer]

1 - What source are you quoting?

2 - I never suggested he shadowed it, your witness did. Obviously this is wrong since the C130 came from a different direction (see images below)

3 - The C130 pilot, did see A77 banking PRIOR to impact. At that point, the plane was at his 12 o'clock. (See images below)

Not that I support Lyte at all. I think he is quoting the very excellent BBC program. Here is the relevant snip:

 

[nicepants]

Not that I support Lyte at all. I think he is quoting the very excellent BBC program. Here is the relevant snip:

That's what I'm quoting from, but the quotes that Lyte is posting were not in there, I have asked him to post the source but so far he has not done so.

 

[CurtC]

Erm, as I'm coming somewhat late to Lyte's "argument," could someone (other than Lyte) possibly explain to me, succinctly, exactly how Lyte alleges that American 77's being north of the Citgo would prove that the aircraft flew over the Pentagon at the same spot as the explosion?

Yes, it's tortuous, but try to stay with me. If the plane came in from the North of the Citgo, then of course it couldn't have knocked down the light poles, so they had to be planted. But get this - the damage pattern inside the Pentagon clearly was lined up with the path that points back at the light poles, so a plane from the North of the Citgo could not have made that damage! Therefore, the most parsimonious explanation is that the jet didn't hit the Pentagon at all, therefore it must have flown over without hitting it, therefore there must have been something else that caused the big explosion. But all those witnesses thought they saw it it, so it must have been exquisitely timed so that the explosion happened at just the instant that the large airliner-sized plane pulled up and flew just over the Pentagon's wall. No one reported seeing this flyover, because the news media immediately pounced on the scene and planted false memories in the witnesses by asking "did you see the plane that hit the Pentagon?"

I'm serious, this is his explanation. Why he trusts the damage pattern inside the Pentagon that disproves a plane strike from the wrong direction, yet dismisses all the other evidence from within the Pentagon, such as identified plane parts, DNA of its passengers, and the flight data recorder, I don't think I'll ever know.

 

[boloboffin]

Yes, it's tortuous, but try to stay with me. If the plane came in from the North of the Citgo, then of course it couldn't have knocked down the light poles, so they had to be planted. But get this - the damage pattern inside the Pentagon clearly was lined up with the path that points back at the light poles, so a plane from the North of the Citgo could not have made that damage! Therefore, the most parsimonious explanation is that the jet didn't hit the Pentagon at all, therefore it must have flown over without hitting it, therefore there must have been something else that caused the big explosion. But all those witnesses thought they saw it it, so it must have been exquisitely timed so that the explosion happened at just the instant that the large airliner-sized plane pulled up and flew just over the Pentagon's wall. No one reported seeing this flyover, because the news media immediately pounced on the scene and planted false memories in the witnesses by asking "did you see the plane that hit the Pentagon?"

I'm serious, this is his explanation. Why he trusts the damage pattern inside the Pentagon that disproves a plane strike from the wrong direction, yet dismisses all the other evidence from within the Pentagon, such as identified plane parts, DNA of its passengers, and the flight data recorder, I don't think I'll ever know.

What's more, Lyte thinks the physical evidence not lining up with the actual flight path was part of the plan. I can't remember whether he copped to this here or at DU, but he said this in response to my specific questions about it. I was mock-lamenting the fact that the "ground crew" had done all that work faking a specific flight path and then the plane missed it by a good 15 or 20 degrees. This was of no concern to him, however. Somehow, he's got it worked out that the incongruence was intentional.