Has any NISTer presented anything during any debate on this forum...that actually DEBUNKS the PET? That's quasi-rhetorical, since it's all but impossible to debunk the PET...as all reports and analysis will have to fall under the, "Theory," category....because, why? Well, because the government decided to destroy all of the key evidence (of the collapses) at one of the largest crimes scenes in the history of the US.
What evidence could we suppy to prove there weren't explosives in the Towers? Seriously. How can we prove they
weren't there?
The only way to show that something wasn't there is to show that evidence that should be there, if they were there, isn't there. Can you understand that? I know you have difficulty with all these words 'n stuff.
So, what evidence shoud we find, if there were explosives?
Sounds for one thing. Show us a video of the collapse of any of WTC1, 2 or 7 that has anything like the explosive sounds you find in known CD cases. Show us that these sounds are correlated with the collapse. An explosion minutes before the collapse is meaningless. If explosives were used to bring down the towers, they would have collapsed almost immediately upon detonation.
Another thing would be flashes or high-speed jets of debris. Lots of them, co-ordinated with each other, and with the sounds mentioned above, and proceeding the collapse, not following it. All of the "squibs" and "flashes" that have been shown so far fail on all these counts.
A third thing would be residue of explosives. Contrary to your claims that all the evidence was removed, NIST had access to hundreds of pieces of steel. None show any residue of explosives.
So that's three things we would expect to find, if your hypothesis was correct. Since we see none of these things, we conclude your hypothesis has failed the test, and it is rejected.
So, now you can go on about your day, and dismiss or ignore this post like all the others you don't like.
