February Stundie Nominations

The person who wrote it is a woman.

That raises more questions. Does she look like a child? Is she upset that guys are digging other ladies with bigger boobies or something?

It's just weird to say there are loads of transsexuals in the media without there being some sort of agenda behind it.
 
It's just weird to say there are loads of transsexuals in the media without there being some sort of agenda behind it.


I'm not sure she actually knows what a transsexual is. She doesn't seem to be complaining about men who have had sex changes, but women who have features she sees as even slightly masculine.

But then she ends with this:

Most real-life women are a combination of the two, just as I am, with some veering more toward the feminine or masculine sides. Women who are too fat or too thin will generally have reduced facial-femininity.


Really. That's the very last paragraph of her blog post. By the end of her post she seems to have completely forgotten what she claimed to be crusading against in the first sentence of the same post. :boggled:
 
Last edited:
So just a stream of consciousness from the unwell?

Which would make it like so many other Stundies.
 
I think the LGBT movement would, quite rightly, be appauled by the bloggers confusion over what the words she is typing means. "Tranny" could I suppose be taken to mean "transexual" or "transvestite", but she goes on to discuss neither. God knows what was farting in her brain for the paedophile rant.

There is literally no way to interpret her words with out being disgusted. I went from wondering why transexuals in the media is meant to be a bad thing, to worrying about how vapid you must be to care about the way others look, to wondering how demeaning one person can be to women in a single sentence.

None of it makes sense, and when you think it does it insults somebody new.
 
That raises more questions. Does she look like a child? Is she upset that guys are digging other ladies with bigger boobies or something?

It's just weird to say there are loads of transsexuals in the media without there being some sort of agenda behind it.

She's a Catholic traditionalist and a housewife and has a persecution complex about it. That's where a lot of this comes from. She thinks there's a anti-family/anti-traditionalist/anti-housewife agenda behind this, but that agenda is more diffuse than the standard conspiracy theories.

You might expect that she was brainwashed into her views by some ultrafundamentalist Christian sect, but she wasn't. You can tell this because the degree to which she is attacking (American) men. It has more to do with her choice to be a pretend rebel. She acts as if being a housewife is "socially persecuted" in some way, but that's just her persecution complex talking. It's like teenagers raised by ultra-liberal parents deciding to rebel by being conservative.

There's also some anti-Americanism involved as she keeps talking about how things are better in rural Germany. Of course, she doesn't ever act on this and actually move there.

She's not a conspiracy theorist as such since she doesn't think the Jews or a similar group is behind this. That's why she blames things on soy formula, general cultural trends, and the like. She's also a Ron Paul supporter.
 
I think the LGBT movement would, quite rightly, be appauled by the bloggers confusion over what the words she is typing means. "Tranny" could I suppose be taken to mean "transexual" or "transvestite", but she goes on to discuss neither. God knows what was farting in her brain for the paedophile rant.

There is literally no way to interpret her words with out being disgusted. I went from wondering why transexuals in the media is meant to be a bad thing, to worrying about how vapid you must be to care about the way others look, to wondering how demeaning one person can be to women in a single sentence.

None of it makes sense, and when you think it does it insults somebody new.

It's not just insulting to women. It's insulting to men as well because she said there is something wrong with men who have relationships with women she doesn't consider "feminine looking" by some weird standard she came up with.
 
You apparently hang in some weird corners of the web LordXenu.

Of course this has provided us with some pretty good Stundies. So I am thankful for your sacrifice.
 
Picked THIS up from someone named Edward Alexander over at the DI Stundie motherlode:-

Those caps were so weird I was convinced that you were watching with with the 'transcribe audio' option on.

I apologize for doubting your work in the stundanium pits.
 
Those caps were so weird I was convinced that you were watching with with the 'transcribe audio' option on.

I apologize for doubting your work in the stundanium pits.



Oh Dear.....

Is it possible to nominate my own post for a Stundie? I didn't even know the subtitle option was there on you-tube. Shoot me fore I die of shame :-]

Compus
 
No, if you *do* choose the transcribe option, the caps are even weirder. But it's like that if somebody is a native speaker *and* speaking clearly. It has a certain merit as a stoner toy.*


*Hypothesis not tested as yet.
 
^ :=]

Meanwhile, another rather amusing little exchange back in the DI swamp..

theabbot 7 (HERE) wonders whether the Woodpeckers amazing ability to uhhhhh, peck wood, was a random or intelligent design thingy:-


theabbot 7 said:
What do you think?
Did the woodpecker's shock-absorbing head come about by chance? Or was it designed?


In reply, mithios speculates that:-


mithios said:
It's kind of like birds being naturally designed to not be electrocuted by power lines,aeons before power lines were invented


Compus
 
Last edited:
^ :=]

Meanwhile, another rather amusing little exchange back in the DI swamp..

theabbot 7 (HERE) wonders whether the Woodpeckers amazing ability to uhhhhh, peck wood, was a random or intelligent design thingy:-


In reply, mithios speculates that:-

"It's kind of like birds being naturally designed to not be electrocuted by power lines,aeons before power lines were invented"

Compus

That one has got to be a top challenger for the month.:jaw-dropp
 
/OT

I have laughed so much reading these fine posts :D
What a bumper crop this month's Stundie Field is going to produce!

(My commiserations to Garrison, I didn't realise you were from Milton Keynes.
My thoughts are with you. Keep smiling. ;) )

/OT

Keep up the good work guys, this is a comedy goldmine! :D
 
/OT


(My commiserations to Garrison, I didn't realise you were from Milton Keynes.
My thoughts are with you. Keep smiling. ;) )

I shall smile, as you are mysteriously trampled to death by concrete cows. :)
Apologies to everyone else to whom that last statement made no sense whatsoever. :)
 
Ron Paul has been winning the Republican primaries ans caucuses, but he's the victim of voting fraud. There's also some other gibberish:
http://vault-co.blogspot.com/2012/02/if-voting-was-any-danger-to-elite-theyd.html

Vault-Co says Ron Paul swept the state with more than 50% of the vote. Unfortunately Diebold machines had been programmed in advance to give one of his zionist meat puppet opponents all of those votes at random. That is why Demockrassy is so grand. Time for international observers to monitor elections in this third world country.

I hear Adelson is getting ready to ditch inflatable adultery clown Newt and put him back into the shabbas goy hibernation chamber. Sleep well, Gingrich. The next time you awaken from the cryo storage you will open your eyes and discover you have been strapped to the front of a bulldozer being used to clear homes in Palestine. They don't want to scratch the shovel. Bulldozers are expensive.

The message is what matters, not the goy clown used to deliver it. Any gentile can be trained to read off a teleprompter. They're so cute, they're almost like little people.
 
That site makes Pip-Boy cry. It has the sort of compulsively clever word-play that makes me think of brain damage.
 

Back
Top Bottom