February Stundie nominations

I did put "horrible abominations of logic" right in the OP.
 
Doesn't count if it's a Poe though surely? Otherwise it's just an exercise in creative writing.
 
This isn't in defense of a conspiracy per se, but I like it.



timf1234 said:
Do you have any counter argument to the points I made in my above post?
Or you are so cornered that you want to ban drawing Mohammad Caricature, or any criticism of Islam, or liberals.
Why can't I call a spade a spade?
I am proving that when a brain function normally about one subject but then goes go hey wire on other topic then the brain is partially damaged. I charge liberals of having mental disorder and I am proving my points by showing the flaws on liberals argument.

If you any logical argument then please present them.
I will counter argue.
Can you do that, please?
Click to expand...
 
This is the STUNDIE of the Century. I've posted this in the Obama Birth Certificate Trial thread, but have to post this here.

This is the NICHOLAS E. PURPURA v KATHLEEN SEBELIUS divorce trial, that has been going on for well over 20 years. The original judge that started on the case, died.

NICHOLAS E. PURPURA is representing himself and the undefined "People" in HIS divorce case. He is now blaming Obama's ielligibilty to be President.

This should also get a stundie for the mere fact that the ToC is nearly 8 pages by itself.


http://www.scribd.com/doc/48177065/...equest-for-Summary-Judgment-Motion-Forfieture

I submit the entire Motion as a Stundie.
 
Arus808 said:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48177065/...equest-for-Summary-Judgment-Motion-Forfieture

I submit the entire Motion as a Stundie.
Click to expand...

I like this bit.

Unlike previous Petition challenging Mr. Obama's eligibility, Defendants do not require Mr. Obama produce any documentation of his citizenship. Plaintiffs will prove Mr. Obama is ineligible based upon the Constitution, the Supreme law of the land supported by ample Supreme Court precedent not addressed or before the Courts previously.
Click to expand...

Apparently there's a clause in the US Constitution saying "Anybody called Obama is ineligible to serve as President, regardless of citizenship". Who'd have thought it?

Dave
 
It's amazing how meaning changes when perceived by a Holocaust denier.

little grey rabbit said:
JREF advertises itself as a place you can discuss any subject that is excluded from the hegemonic knowlege-power continuum - for want of a more robust framework and description of JREF's mission.
Click to expand...

Hands up, all of you who knew that was what we were doing.

Dave
 
Not sure if this fits the bill, but I've come across this in a perusal of a down under cannabis site...

https://cannabis.community.forums.ozstoners.com/index.php/topic/31264-weather-manipulation/

Hey all.

I'm absolutely convinced that the recent floods on the east coast of Australia were the work of Anna Bligh (and likely the federal government was involved). It's a conspiracy and no main stream media wants anything to do with it (I've sent e-mails to major networks with no response).

On August 8, 2010 it was reported by the Sydney Morning Herald that Anna Bligh had struck a deal with the Thai King to use his rain making technology in Queensland by spraying chemicals in the sky. At this time QLD was in drought. In November of 2010 my parents went to QLD for 4 weeks and they stated that it literally rained the entire time.
Click to expand...
 
I nominate the following post for a Stundie:

Originally Posted by PhantomWolf
Just because there is no overwhelming evidence doesn't mean it isn't going to happen.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Java Man was asked the cost of rebuilding the WTC. Here is his somewhat inexplicable retort:



In New York, construction firms pay you!

Dave
Click to expand...

I always wondered why they made the buildings so tall.
 
Java Man demonstrates some serious financial ignorance in this post.

Java Man said:
I believe that yes and I'm not delusional. That's the point of an insurance isn't it? Pay a bit of the risk value and get paid the full if the event happens. I'm sure your car insurance doesn't cost more than your car right? It costs a fraction of it. Now if you loose your car in a car crash then you get paid the full value it was insured for. Now if you bought the car from a cash stripped friend at half the value you made some money out of it.

Now imagine you buy a semi at less than half value because the owner is in real need for money. Then down the road you're involved in an accident and two cars hit you. One in the cabin and one on the trailer. Your semi is wrecked, but you claim twice the insurance because there were two cars involved. You're making some serious money, more than four times what you paid for the semi.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom