February Stundie Nominations

Charles Norrie again. When they say there was only one device, that means there were two.

Link

Charles said:
It gives considerable credence to the view there was a second larger explosion on the aircraft which is covertly referred to in the AAIB report (see page F-4, which says: "No evidence was seen to suggest that more than one IED had detonated on Flight 103". IED is not a synonym for explosion,and an alternative and valid reading of this sentence miight be:"There was evidence of a second explosion, not attributable to an IED".
Click to expand...


That's right, every time Air Accident investigators think a piece of military ordnance exploded on an aircraft as well as the terrorist's suitcase bomb, they indicate that by cleverly calling the suitcase bomb an "IED" (improvised explosive device) and leave the rest as an exercise for the reader....

Rolfe.
 
Define science for us please, Rio Blast:

Remember, computer models and recreations are NOT SCIENCE and do not prove anything or create scientific facts- period. So, if you believe in NIST's computer models and assumptions from them, you must also believe in manmade global warming and you must also not believe in science.
Click to expand...

Do want some water to wash down that pretzel logic?
 
Mehmet Inan on Facebook can't make up his mind wether he's better than everyone else:

The truth about 9/11 is not in the official story, not also in the most known conspiracy theories. Only sincere Muslims could explain the truth, like on my web site
Spoken like a true muslim supremacist.
AH, no! Muslims have no supremacy thinking, only Jews consider themselves as superior people. Do not put on behalf of Muslims what you actually are.
All evidence is converging to Zionists Israelis who made 9/11.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Chris Strunk, freeman on the land and frivolous litigant, explains why the judge keeps dismissing his cases:

16. That Declarant contends that Judge Ross is predisposed to a bias towards Declarant in all the cases assigned to her because she was once an employee of General Motors that is controlled by the Knights of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM)
Click to expand...
 
Rogue1stclass said:
Alright, what did this guy do to piss of the Hospitallers? And why do the Hospitallers own a car company?
Click to expand...

When you get hurt in a car wreck you go to the Hospital so by building bad cars you can increase business, the Car>hospital>insurance companies>big pharm>NWO>obscure Catholic order connection is clear and direct.
 
OK, this is not Stundie-eligible, but I have to post it because for sheer ignorance it matches every other nomination, and surpasses some of them:

DOC said:
Thomas Arnold (of Oxford) wrote a 3 volume book on the history of Rome. His statement was:

"I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is PROVED BY BETTER AND FULLER EVIDENCE of every sort, than the great sign which God has given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead."

The man said what he said, I can't prove him wrong in his statement.

The only historical evidence I know of the American Revolution is what I've read in a few history books. I've read 27 books of the New Testament, and I know at least 42 US Presidents have claimed to be Christian. To be honest I've read more historical evidence for Christ than I have for the American Revolution..

ETA: And I cannot remember reading any eyewitnesses to the American Revolution that specifically talked about the American Revolution. I doubt if any of the history books I've read that talked about the Amer. Rev. were written by eyewitnesses to it.
Click to expand...
 
I dedicate this Stundie to Magz talking about Flight 93:

MaGZ said:
It is my understanding Ed Felt was in the restroom of the plane and was on the phone when he said he just saw a "white flash", which would indicate the plane was hit by an air to air missile.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom