• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged FBI Video Release

911files said:
I received 2 DVD's from the FBI this morning as an interim release for FOIA 1078686-000. I have one converted to MPG and uploaded, but I'm trying to get the second one trimmed down in file size (wmv file) so that it can be accessed on the web (currently 700mb). I'll post a link for both, although the NE485 link may not be operative for a few hours while I trim it down.

These are the file descriptions as provided by the FBI. The witness face in NE418 is blurred out by the FBI Privacy review.

NE418 - One(1) VHS video cassette, Witness interviews near Pentagon after attack. (26 MB)​

This witness claims he saw a plane fly over the Pentagon. No wait a minute, fly into the Pentagon, followed by a second white decoy jet. Whoops, wrong again, he says the second plane was a four-engine gray plane that veered off.

NE485 - One(1) VHS video cassette, labeled "9/11/2001", Footage of post-crash Pentagon crime scene obtained from Chief Mastin, Prince William County. (68 MB)​

One interesting scene with the NTSB examining missile parts (or could those be plane parts?).

I highly recommend right-click, "save target as" due to the file size.
Click to expand...

So you're saying... what? That neither video shows the plane-sized hologram ghosting into eventual nothingness over and beyond the Pentagon, a tiny (but clearly audible) trademarked Industrial Light & Magic *chime* sounding in the final frames...?!?

Lousy NWO shill. Come the Revolution, baby. ;)
 
Was there a Tape 1 of 1B-1B647? Too bad this guy didn't point the camera more to the left and catch Lloyd England planting those light poles. :rolleyes:
 
I'm still looking for that elusive hologram, but I have not found it yet (my brothers at the FBI did a good edit job). They sent me 5 more vids yesterday and I'm working on getting them up ASAP. I did a seperate thread for the DEA video, but the other 4 I'll post here.

The past few weeks I have earned my NWO shill pay fer sure :)
 
Mangoose said:
Was there a Tape 1 of 1B-1B647? Too bad this guy didn't point the camera more to the left and catch Lloyd England planting those light poles. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Yes sir, there is. It is longer and I'm getting it up to YouTube now. Should be ready in a few.
 
911files said:
This is not an easy process folks, and I really do resent CIT posting one of them on YouTube without crediting the source. If they have a problem with me, they could at least credit Scott who has invested many years and large sums of money to secure their release.
Click to expand...

Wow. That pretty much appears to be par for the course for CIT and others like them. Let other people do all the work.
 


Here is the second part of the earlier video. The sound works on this one and an AP reporter takes the camera in fairly close to the impact area.
 
Wow, that last part sure was fascinating. Quite hard to take it all in. The first part is clearly the tourist video that the AP reporter partially taped over. So the sound is lacking in the original of part 2 as well?
 
No, the sound is on the original. That is why I say the YouTube versions are crappy. By the way, the Tape 1 original has finished uploading.
 
What horrific sound. I've never heard clipping as bad as this. It makes it hard to understand what is being said. In another thread, you mentioned an amateur newly released video mentioning the light poles....is it this one or another? Do you have more info on where to find that reference?

I see that the reporter and the tourist have a conversation at one point about the plane. "It was a plane?" "Yep I saw it coming down" "I thought I seen it back there too."
 
Last edited:
In one of the next two that I'll be uploading tonight, the cameraman has a good shot of a light fixture on the pavement. It exhibits a shatter/debris field consistent with impact with the pavement from above. It is not something you would see if the light was "planted". Further, the debris from it in the lane would have been moved significantly if it had been "planted" the night before and had cars driving over it all night/morning.
 
I have two additional FBI vids uploaded in raw form. I will not be converting these to crappy YouTubes, but anyone interested in them may send me a pm and I will provide links for your download pleasure for the mpg's.
 
911files said:
I have two additional FBI vids uploaded in raw form. I will not be converting these to crappy YouTubes, but anyone interested in them may send me a pm and I will provide links for your download pleasure for the mpg's.
Click to expand...

Anything of any interest in 'em?
 
Nothing other than what I explained to Mangoose above. One is a pool video from 9/11 pm, and the other is similar to the two already posted, but better quality. I did not see anything in them that was not already seen in other videos of the area post-impact. I have not however viewed them in great detail as yet.
 
MercBezerk really enjoyed the videos at YouTube:

Wow. That certainly disproved the north side and the flyover/flyby. What a joke. But I know, "John", it's all about producing a bulk of info and data supportive of the official story or imply it is supportive while you act like you are a veteran researcher that worked closely with us. You just keep reiterating how you are an "engineer" and handle "statistical processing", produce some fancy graphs and charts and use big "engineering" terms. Then you sound authoritative and genuine huh?
Click to expand...

It flew away. Ask Roosevelt Roberts.
Click to expand...

Have you even heard the phone you made with Craig? F*cking busted. You aren't even a good spy. "Collaborate" instead of "corroborate", "Vent" instead of "vet". You sound like a coked out ,brain dead CIA op. No you sound like a bumbling George Bush, "see I'm an engineer, I speak in engineerin' terms. I don't listen to witnesses, I pretend they don't matter while I reinforce the official data that is being piped thru me. I act as if there nothin' wrong with the data while I casually support it."
Click to expand...

I am so glad someone appreciates the new materials :D
 
911files said:


Here is the second part of the earlier video. The sound works on this one and an AP reporter takes the camera in fairly close to the impact area.
Click to expand...

Incredible footage. Thanks for posting. Just a question, do you see any wreckage from Flight 77 in that clip?
 
Do you see any dead bodies? No? Well there are some there, some inside. But how can that be if you can't see them on the video???

TAM:)
 
Thanks. Yes, I do see some debris, but most of it would be expect in the helipad area. It hit the wall at an angle and what did not penetrate would have fanned out to the left. We can see that in videos of that area of the lawn and in the DCA ASR data. After impact, the airborne debris field is picked up in that area as well.

It is a phenomenon that I missed when I was examining the unexplained light source on the Citgo video. I am now inclined to think that it is somehow related, but I have not had a chance to work on that in recent months. Maybe after I get all of this new stuff processed and up I'll go back to that problem.
 
T.A.M. said:
Do you see any dead bodies? No? Well there are some there, some inside. But how can that be if you can't see them on the video???

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I'm not asking about the bodies, I'm asking about the plane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom