I also too, thought he was advocating the execution of two 10-year old boys.
It's been a while now. I wonder whether Muldur will admit the desire to execute 10 year olds.
I also too, thought he was advocating the execution of two 10-year old boys.
I wasn't saying there was just one lawyer, I was illlustrating how many man-hours at what rate is required to rack up $12 million in legal fees.
Execution of a lawfully convicted person by definition is not murder. The state, when acting in it's [sic] legal authority through the police and courts, cannot murder. Neither can a soldier shooting an enemy combatant. Nor can a private citizen exercising their rights to self-defense.
It also releases sociopaths, gives them new identities and puts them in unsuspecting communities where they commit new crimes, as happened with one of the monsters who killed little Jamie Bulger. Jon Venables (or whatever new name they gave him now) was recently re-arrested for participating in child pornography.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/07/jon-venables-alleged-child-porn-offences
This guy I think more than sums up my opinion of THAT:
http://www.economicvoice.com/jamie-bulgers-killer-back-behind-bars/5007456
Furthermore, BOTH of the monsters have violated their paroles prior to that in 2005.
None of that was in response to the point that UKDave made. It wasn't relevant. Did you read the thread up till that point?