six7s
veretic
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Messages
- 8,716
Fascinating!
(now I want to know why/how/etc... note: I ain't that suggesting you address these questions in the sclerochronology article)
The following suggestion is made on the assumption that I'm by no means unique in being so impatient that I started skim reading soon after the heading 'The creationist argument' (I was itching to know why a second is being added "a little less than once a year")[swiki]Creationists and Leap-Seconds[/swiki].
... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per day per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...
... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...
No, that's correct. It may sound awkward, but it's correct.... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per day per year ...
... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per year ...
I had a hunch that might be the case... maybe there's too much blood in my caffeine supplyNo, that's correct. It may sound awkward, but it's correct.
Oh, let's not get into an argument over double/single quotes and their appropriate usage...As you're not quoting anyone...
The fact that they are called "Darwin's finches", together
The fact that they are called 'Darwin's finches', together