• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evolution: the Facts.

:cool: ...mussels deposit their growth bands every low tide, but also show variations according to the phase of the moon, so that they keep count of low tides and of lunar months.

Fascinating! :)

(now I want to know why/how/etc... note: I ain't that suggesting you address these questions in the sclerochronology article)
 
:( ...accuracy of radiometric dating. For we would predict that the older...

:) ...accuracy of radiometric dating. We would predict that the older...
 
:( ...examined so far is from the Middle Devonian. of New York and Ontario...

:) ...examined so far is from the Middle Devonian of New York and Ontario...
 
:( ...an isotopic analysis we could examines fossil and estimate directly...

:) ...an isotopic analysis we could examine fossils and estimate directly...
 
:confused: ...about 400 days per year in the Devonian period, confirms the stratigraphic and radiometric data showing that the Devonian period was...

:) ...about 400 days per year in the Devonian period confirms the stratigraphic and radiometric data, showing that the Devonian period was...
 
Thanks, yet again, for a fascinating and thought-provoking article :)
 
No, it's in the middle of a primary clause. It needs to not be there.

ETA: It's clearer if you extract the "for example" and put it at the beginning of the sentence:

:( For example, the fact that there were about 400 days per year in the Devonian period, confirms the stratigraphic and radiometric data showing that the Devonian period was a very long time ago.

:) For example, the fact that there were about 400 days per year in the Devonian period confirms the stratigraphic and radiometric data showing that the Devonian period was a very long time ago.

Simplify the clause and you get "The fact confirms that..." not "the fact, confirms that..."
 
Last edited:
Very well. When it comes to grammar, vox populi, vox dei.

---

[swiki]Creationists and Leap-Seconds[/swiki].
 
Last edited:
[swiki]Creationists and Leap-Seconds[/swiki].
The following suggestion is made on the assumption that I'm by no means unique in being so impatient that I started skim reading soon after the heading 'The creationist argument' (I was itching to know why a second is being added "a little less than once a year")

I suggest a rather major cut'n'paste; moving what is currently (and I think inappropriately) the last four paragraphs of 'The creationist argument' TO the end of 'Why are there leap seconds?'
 
:( ... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per day per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...

:) ... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...
 
:( ... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per day per year ...

:) ... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per year ...
 
:( ... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per day per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...

:) ... acknowledged that the Earth is only slowing down at 1.4 milliseconds per century, continue to draw from this accurate figure ...
:( ... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per day per year ...

:) ... their more deluded brethren who put the figure at one second per year ...
No, that's correct. It may sound awkward, but it's correct.

I explain the meaning of the phrase in "Why are there leap seconds?"
 
Last edited:
No, that's correct. It may sound awkward, but it's correct.
I had a hunch that might be the case... maybe there's too much blood in my caffeine supply

Anyhooo.....

Thanks (yet again) for stretching my brain :)
 
A piece on [swiki]Darwin's Finches[/swiki] ... not so much on their biological significance, as on the myth of their historical significance.
 
:( This was discovered only when Darwin presented is collection

:) This was discovered only when Darwin presented his collection
 
As you're not quoting anyone...

:( The fact that they are called "Darwin's finches", together

:) The fact that they are called 'Darwin's finches', together
 
You mention 'adaptive radiation' without any explanation/description stuff

I have a hunch that I'm not alone in having to guess at or search for a definition
 
:( has made people think that Darwin had the finches particularly in mind in these passages

:) has made many people think that Darwin had the finches particularly in mind in these passages
 

Back
Top Bottom