Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting you see linking to articles and statements as bullying of someone.

When they are strawman attacks, yes. They can be.

I see you did not quote a specific post, so I'll take that as none of them were considered as bullying.

You can take what you like. I made my point a couple posts back.

If you feel otherwise, please feel free to quote those posts that support "attacks and bullying on Warren".

Already done.
 
Anyone think its odd that you are wringing your hands over this as opposed to a Congressman actually faking a Native American minority status, joining a fake tribe, and securing multi-million dollar contracts meant for minority owned businesses?


Before this gets too out of hand I think it needs to be clarified that it isn't Congressman Kevin McCarthy, but rather his brother-in-law, William Wages, who has been scamming the government out of ~$7 million in no-bid and other federal contracts with a fraudulent minority status claim.

Not that that makes it an better.

Whether or not McCarthy, House Majority Leader, has had any influence on the awarding of contracts to his BIL remains to be seen.

Needless to say, he categorically denies any such involvement.
 
Math Teacher: Okay class what is 2+2?
Timmy: 5!
Math Teacher: WHAT REPUBLICAN TOLD YOU THAT! GIVE ME HIS NAME!

You're going to go with the claim that you independently came up with the dishonest spin the Republicans have been pushing? And this makes you look better?
 
I fear that there may be no way to achieve that except with the pressure of a third party added to the political arena, Joe.

Plus, "Not this election because it's too important", I'm not going to buy that either.

I'm not sure how the pressure of a third party would encourage more cooperation between the two established parties. If anything, since third parties have generally been farther from the center, it pushes GOP and DEM candidates farther to the edges to try to avoid losing voters from the extremes of their own side.

If we want more parties to have a positive influence, we need to ditch first past the post in favor of something like ranked choice, and we need those third parties to start by gaining a lot of power in more local elections and gaining a reputation for being able to actually do things.
 
Did she claim to be a minority by checking a box on a form? Yes. What particular minority ethnicity does she claim? Black, Mexican, Asian? No. Cherokee or Delaware with a documented instance of her using Cherokee.

Your pathological need to call everyone liars about the core issue is just funny.

It’s a shame that you don’t have a better grasp of irony.

Otherwise, you would appreciate the idea of someone insisting without evidence that another person is a liar, while they themselves get their panties in a bunch when that same accusation is leveled at them.

If you’re not prepared to be called a liar for every inaccurate claim you make, then maybe don’t be so quick to call other people liars.
 
"Warren’s video and subsequent release of her DNA report was a disgrace, a vicious rejection of Native sovereignty, and, more than anything, completely foreseeable. Had Warren spoken to any Native with a clear mind, this idea would have been dead on arrival; instead, I now have to grit my teeth to the nerve and solemnly nod my head in agreement with a ************* Donald Trump tweet."

What Warren did is despicable—not just because of how short-sighted and selfish it was, but because it betrays the agreement between tribal governments and the United States government that our people are their own people.
 
It’s a shame that you don’t have a better grasp of irony.

Otherwise, you would appreciate the idea of someone insisting without evidence that another person is a liar, while they themselves get their panties in a bunch when that same accusation is leveled at them.

If you’re not prepared to be called a liar for every inaccurate claim you make, then maybe don’t be so quick to call other people liars.

That is ironic in the same way, "nanny nanny boo boo, your a liar too hoo," is. Which is to say, not at all. Excellent argumentation, there.
 
"Warren’s video and subsequent release of her DNA report was a disgrace, a vicious rejection of Native sovereignty, and, more than anything, completely foreseeable. Had Warren spoken to any Native with a clear mind, this idea would have been dead on arrival; instead, I now have to grit my teeth to the nerve and solemnly nod my head in agreement with a ************* Donald Trump tweet."...

Another tweet from DONNY GRAPE JUICE? Wow ...
 
That is ironic in the same way, "nanny nanny boo boo, your a liar too hoo," is. Which is to say, not at all. Excellent argumentation, there.

No, the irony is in you labeling Warren a liar without considering any other possibility, and then whining that you were merely "mistaken" after being called a liar for your false claims.

Maybe try having consistent standards.
 
If you were her in that position while teaching, would you have marked yourself as a minority law teacher? Why or why not?

There are many reasons other than misrepresentation. If she believed her mother to be Native American, then she probably saw herself as such.

Who are you to say someone is not Native American just because they do not conform to YOUR stereotype?

She might be deluded, but if she self-identifies as Native American, that is her prerogative.
 
You disagree with the evidence in a purely partisan way. But hey, I'm sure the non-stop Republican spin that you are paroting had nothing to do with your opinion formed in spite of all known evidence.

Why does it have to be zero or all? Can't some of the "spin" be correct and some be incorrect? Is it possible -- and, bear with me here -- that both sides have some points to make on this issue?

Heresy, I know.
 
I guess I better not tell you what my mother would have said if I responded like that.

Oh, you can. One more dodge won't change your record much.

Seriously would it hurt you so much to recognise that there is a significant portion of people who don't fall within two opposed, easily-labeled "sides"?

You could call it Independents United, if you don't mind it being slightly oxymoronic.

That's brilliant, but not silly enough for my tastes.
 
Cherokee is not an ethnicity.
It's not? Then what term would you use for it? I think the term "ethnicity" is a silly term and I really wish we didn't have to use it, but it seems the most apt to use in this context.

Warren (and hundreds of thousands of other Americans) claimed Native American ancestry. Seems she was right to, it's in her DNA.
But here's the core of the question in my view: Why would she claim such ethnicity to the extent of checking the the boxes on a form? If I find 1% black in my DNA, should I then check off the black check box on those forms? As it is, I can check off hispanic and Native American if i so choose and I have much more of that ethnicity in my DNA as a percentage than Warren does of NA. The question is why would i choose to do so? Why is it so important to some people?

This is exactly why I say that ethnicity is a silly term - it really says absolutely nothing about an individual EXCEPT, perhaps as a symbol of some kind of disadvantaged status.

I really don't get this "pride of ancestors" thing, either. Why would I be proud to know that 6 generations ago, an ancestor was Mayan? Why would I contribute a tuna cassarole recipe to a cookbook of the MesoAmerican cultures and sign it xjx388 Mayan? It's just so weird to me.
 
She told more of a story than that.



That implies sufficient level of ancestry to generate animosity. By naming the tribe that also puts some other limitations on that.

If her father's family believed her mother was part Cherokee/Delaware and shunned her, it matters not a whit whether Warren's mother actually was or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom