So, it all started with plasma. Seems there is still a fair bit of plasma around from the "Big Bang".
“It is an interesting fact that most of the material in the visible universe, as much as 99% according to some estimates, is in the plasma state”[8]
LINK
Yes. And.........................? We kind of know about plasma. We know what it can do and what it can't do. And have done for a long time. Nothing your cult proposes is even scientifically possible.
Let's take the ridiculous electric sun woo. The clown Scott wants an incoming current of drift electrons! Duh! Tell me, with your enormous knowledge of plasma physics, how you are getting an electron (or ion, for that matter), that is travelling at half-rat power, past a magnetic field that is being carried outward by the solar wind at ~ 400 km/s? Cannot be done. The only things that can enter the heliopause, past that magnetic field, are neutrals and charged particles with relativistic energies. Cosmic rays, in other words. And ~ 99% of those are ions. And there aren't enough of them to power much of anything.
Scott claims, in his sheer ignorance of all things plasma physics, that the solar wind is a current solely of ions! Despite ~ 60 years of in-situ detections telling us that it is a quasi-neutral flow of electrons and ions. As it must be. Otherwise there would be an enormous space charge, which we might notice, and the Sun would charge up to the opposite charge and promptly explode due to Coulomb repulsion. As your hero Alfven told us back in 1939;
"The correlation of the magnetic storms and aurorae with the solar activity indicates that they are due to some agent emitted from the sun. As this agent causes magnetic and electric disturbances on the earth, it probably consists of charged particles. But, as Schuster has shown, the emission of a sufficient amount of particles, all having the same sign, is impossible because it would give rise to an enormous space charge. This difficulty is avoided if the emitted agent is assumed to consist of the equal amount of positive and negative particles."
A Theory of Magnetic Storms and of the Aurorae
Alfven, H. (1939)
So, who are you going to believe? A clueless ex-EE, or Alfven and a whole bunch of detections?
Sorry, but what you believe is based purely on ignorance and faith, and nothing to do with science.
