• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Electric universe theories here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting! Have to read this paper, but it looks a bit like the magnetic friction that was studied at Utrecht University, for the momentum transport in accretion disks.

Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with the electric universe, because that has a completely different way of creating planets (as also steenkh and JD said).

mmm difficulties trying to get it through scihub :-(
 
Last edited:
Seems you are not happy with NEW MECHANISM!





Good on ya!

It isn't new. Why do you think Philae was measuring the intrinsic magnetic field of 67P?

The non-magnetic nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov‐Gerasimenko
Auster, H-U. et al. (2015)
https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitst..._Magnetic Property_RevisedVersion_2703201.pdf

Implications of Philae Magnetometry Measurements at Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko for the Nebular Field of the Outer Solar System
Biersteker, J. B. et al (2019)
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...126e6ef/1566662392805/Biersteker_2019_ApJ.pdf
 
Interesting! Have to read this paper, but it looks a bit like the magnetic friction that was studied at Utrecht University, for the momentum transport in accretion disks.

Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with the electric universe, because that has a completely different way of creating planets (as also steenkh and JD said).

mmm difficulties trying to get it through scihub :-(

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08693.pdf :)

EDIT:

I had to update sci-hub in my bookmarks not long ago. It seems to now work with the .tw domain.
 
Last edited:
Yup, you have a problem Houston Sol88!



The rocky-like behavior of cometary landslides on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

Fixed that for you, Sol88
You may want to look up in a dictionary what it means when the suffix "like" is added to a word.
By the way, a suffix is a word that is added at the end of another word.
 
Did you really think that magnetism and plasma is unknown to science? This is a new mechanism that explains the collapse of protoplanetary disks into planets. This is not how EU explains the formation the formation of planets, so just how is this supposed to be good news to you?


Let me quote a passage from the article (which is very interesting. Thanks for bringing it to my attention):

The researchers believe that, through their work, they have discovered a completely new friction mechanism, generated by the interaction of magnetic field and GI, which significantly erodes the angular momentum of the disk. "Thanks to the powerful engine of spiral density waves, our new friction mechanism appears even more efficient in dense protoplanetary disk regions in which there are fewer charged particles to sustain the magnetic field," Deng says. "This is different from any other previously proposed mechanisms, which could not sustain the magnetic field in such regions. "
Isn't it your claim that there is lots and lots of charged particles in the - according to your theory non-existent - protoplanetary disk?

Friction??

:rolleyes:
 
They are, obviously, giant lightning bolts, left over from when Venus was within kissing distance of the Earth and one such bolt ripped out the Grand Canyon. About 20,000 years ago, if memory serves.

What High Priest (or is it Godhead? I can never remember) Thornhill doesn’t say is how these left-over lightning bolts are connected to the EDM jets on comets. You know, the ones that fried the electronics on Rosetta, while it was still a million km away, causing the mission to end in total failure. :D :rolleyes:
 
Ahhh, Scott's fusion in the chromosphere! Lol. The silly old bugger is trying to fry us all with gamma!
I think you are overlooking the fact that the Sun is invisible above the Earth’s atmosphere, and that those gammas are converted to light in the ionosphere. Recently Solon, independently of Godhead Thornhill, proved this. Right here in this very forum! :p :D
 
As in the electric comet thread, Sol88 shows how deep his decades of insanity is

As in the electric comet thread, Sol88 shows how deep his decades of insanity about the electric universe is. See The thousands of insane lies, delusions, insults, etc. since 6 July 2009 from Sol88 about his cult's electric comet and electric Sun dogma.
Sol88's insanity of many years of citing irrelevant mainstream science to derail from his cult's demented dogma.

11 November 2019: What is the Thunderbolts EU cult source for the neutrinos we detect, Sol88 (so far deafening silence from Sol88!)
 
Of course, the whole electric comet nonsense is built upon scientific illiteracy. According to the idiots-in-chief, the Sun has a radial electric field. Which would do things to the solar wind that we do not see. Additionally, electric fields will be perpendicular to magnetic fields. And we know that the Sun has a radial magnetic field (IMF). So, how is this possible? Hint: it isn't. This is what happens when Velikovskians try to do science.

Poor soul, jonesdave116 your still here along with tusenfem...
"People have been studying the solar wind since its discovery in 1959, but there are many important properties of this plasma which are still not well understood," says Stas Boldyrev, professor of physics and lead author of the study.

Still not well understood after nearly 89 years?

Still people ARE trying to understand it form a new a comeplty new view point or pardigm.

PLASMA, ELECTRIC FIELDS, ELECTRIC CURRENTS.

Gravity only sheeple acknowledge magnetic fields and there ability to get all tangled up, snap and reconnect! that's pretty solid science! :thumbsup:

Solar plasma is a molten mix of negatively charged electrons and positively charged ions. Because of this charge, solar plasma is influenced by magnetic fields that extend into space, generated underneath the solar surface. As the hot plasma escapes from the sun's outermost atmosphere, its corona, it flows through space as solar wind. The electrons in the plasma are much lighter particles than the ions, so they move about 40 times faster.

With more negatively charged electrons streaming away, the sun takes on a positive charge. This makes it harder for the electrons to escape the sun's pull. Some electrons have a lot of energy and keep traveling for infinite distances. Those with less energy can't escape the sun's positive charge and are attracted back to the sun. As they do, some of those electrons can be knocked off their tracks ever-so-slightly by collisions with surrounding plasma.
New research helps explain why the solar wind is hotter than expected


Ummmmm... that would set up an electric field. :blush: :rolleyes:
 
I must admit, i had assumed the banging on we hear on this forum from the big banger acolytes and that the solar wind is "quasi neutral" some how shut down the whole ELECRIC UNIVERSE shebang right there.

Seems mainstream have some ways to go before their understanding of
plasma is a molten mix of negatively charged electrons and positively charged ions.
is somewhat more complicated than the gas approximation and it's absolute MISUSE in articles referencing million degree "gas".

Such as the Sun!

What keeps the sun shining again, compression!

Gas laws in a PLASMA Sun.

I don't know, you mob!
 
I must admit, i had assumed the banging on we hear on this forum from the big banger acolytes and that the solar wind is "quasi neutral" some how shut down the whole ELECRIC UNIVERSE shebang right there.

Seems mainstream have some ways to go before their understanding of is somewhat more complicated than the gas approximation and it's absolute MISUSE in articles referencing million degree "gas".

Such as the Sun!

What keeps the sun shining again, compression!

Gas laws in a PLASMA Sun.

I don't know, you mob!

And another EU loon not bothering to read the paper, which says nothing like what is in the press release. Which was likely put together by a biologist! One of the things stressed in the paper is the maintenance of quasi-neutrality. And, in my limited experience, what the author is suggesting re trapped and returning electrons is no different than a figure I have seen in a book I possess by Nicole Meyer-Vernet, on the solar wind. And that is from 2007. It would take an expert to go through the paper (which strangely appears in PNAS; usually biology and Earth sciences) and figure out what it is that they are suggesting that is different from what has already been proposed. That obviously excludes anybody from the EU cult, as they possess nobody with a scooby about plasma physics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom