demon said:
In the UK the blatant misconstruction and misrepresentation of the Spanish election result has been sickening to witness.
How so? Please offer an example.
Especially coming from journalists who practically never mention the extremely dubious claim to power of George W Bush.
Ancient history...you obviously know nothing about American election law. GWB clearly won the Electoral vote...the only stat that counts. GWB's opponents mention popular vote, but that is like saying that your team has more cheerleaders therefore it should win, no matter the final score or the rules of the game.
Pathetic. Moreover none has made the analogy with the UK and registered that...hey!...we don't even have a party for people who don't want the Iraq war. What does that say about our democracy? Pretty damn f****ed if you ask me.
Aren't you a Palestinian? Why not go back and enjoy the Democracy of Yasser Arafat?
When bombs go off in London or elsewhere in the UK how shall our protest votes be registered. What kind of democracy are we?
When?? So you have information that bombs will go off? Perhaps you'd like to share? Besides, who shall you protest? The government of the people bombed, or the people doing the bombing? Oh,...sorry....I suppose the people doing the bombing
aren't on the ballot? Shame isn't it?
You just think: how can they all be such blind, dishonest ◊◊◊◊◊? Practically without exception. Did anyone read Peter Preston after the bombings? Such presenile slobber! Don't these guys ever try and see the world through any other lenses than those prescribed by the prevailing ideology? They are such a bad advertisement for the human faculties of reason and impartial inquiry (let alone self-examination). Self-awareness zero. These are "writers" and they haven't understood anything about the world. Anything. Moreover they're privileged and have every opportunity to inform themselves and follow up dissident perspectives and lines of enquiry. Too bone lazy to ever try. Worthless scum.
So I guess this means you disagree with them? Hey guess what demon? Freedom of speech means that even people who
don't have a myopic penchant for support of murdering terrorists get to publish their opinions. You'd be much happier living in Gaza. I hear they don't allow such awful opinions there!
To be effective and worthwhile people we all have a hard row to hoe...identitfying and expelling the poisons that our culture inculcates in us. All the more reason to strike hard (if only verbally), at journalists who betray their professional and public duty by peddling contempt and encouraging intellectual corruption among the "educated" classes.
Like your brother Islamists did to
This guy?
Oh, wait...you did post a disclaimer;
"if only verbally" so we just can't possibly attack your post eh? You are a hateful human being.
Although in their defence they could say that the problem doesn't start with them, as they are not responsible for the whole (or even much) of the cultural capital and its parlous state.
Yet, that they are uniformly privileged, largely from an Oxbridge background, is a description of the problem, not of the opportunity for enlightenment.
"Enlightenment"?? From whom? You? The bombers whom you lauded for the successful murder of 200 Spaniards?
Spare us your enlightenment. We like our society as it is now...free.
-z