Edward Felt Flight 93

BigAl said:
Wasn't one of the calls made by a passenger that was bumped to onne of the to-be-hijacked planes at the last minute? There would be no way to know the name in advance and prepare to fake his call.
Click to expand...
Careful with that one, the handwave may knock you ass over teacup!
 
sylvan8798 said:
Oh gees, it was just planned to look that way to give the story better creds...
Click to expand...

I hope the NWO 9/11 scriptwriters are getting their residuals for all the syndication that continues to this day by popular demand from the Truthers.
 
BigAl said:
Felt's call proved he was on the plane and that the plane was on it's way to a crash at Shanksville.

I have no idea what point your ramblings are trying to make.
Click to expand...

The call, which the operator received and was talking about, was recorded. Then this recorded call was confiscated. What happened then?
I could be, that the recorded call, which the relatives later heart, was a product of voice morphing, not the original call. There was plenty of time, to duplicate the original call and alter its content.
 
Last edited:
bio said:
The call, which the operator received and was talking about, was recorded. Then this recorded call was confiscated. What happened then?
I could be, that the recorded call, which the relatives later heart, was a product of voice morphing, not the original call. There was plenty of time, to duplicate the original call and alter it content.
Click to expand...

So what? Absent a citation, I give your description of events zero chance of being accurate and, again, so what?

Even so, the time and location of the Felt call shows he was on Flight 93 and on his way to die in Shanksville. This is consistent with all the evidence we have about Flight 93 and 9/11 in general.
 
bio said:
The call, which the operator received and was talking about, was recorded. Then this recorded call was confiscated. What happened then?
I could be, that the recorded call, which the relatives later heart, was a product of voice morphing, not the original call. There was plenty of time, to duplicate the original call and alter it content.
Click to expand...

Why would they do that when there were other calls that proved what happened to Flight 93?

People who spoke to their loved ones in realtime?
 
bio said:
The call, which the operator received and was talking about, was recorded. Then this recorded call was confiscated. What happened then?
I could be, that the recorded call, which the relatives later heart, was a product of voice morphing, not the original call. There was plenty of time, to duplicate the original call and alter its content.
Click to expand...

So your saying that the operator actually received the call - correct?

Then this original recording, that you accept took place, was confiscated and changed?

Why then would that original recording need voice morphing? What are you suggesting was on the original call, that you accept, that needed to be duplicated and altered?

Please, i am enthralled.
 
funk de fino said:
Why would they do that when there were other calls that proved what happened to Flight 93?

People who spoke to their loved ones in realtime?
Click to expand...


Wait... you mean we can't analyze and hypothesize about individual pieces of evidence in a vacuum, separate from all other pieces of evidence?

Whoa, man... Whoa...
 
Last edited:
I was left a voice mail from work today asking if I wanted to work tonight. Is it possible someone stole the original recording and replaced it with another that sounded just like Michele from the Staffing Office?
The US Department of Messing With Recordings and Voice Morphing, once created, would be like any other government agency. Their budget would increase every year and new layers of bureaucracy would accrue. Follow the money!
 
Wolrab said:
I was left a voice mail from work today asking if I wanted to work tonight. Is it possible someone stole the original recording and replaced it with another that sounded just like Michele from the Staffing Office?
Click to expand...

No such voice morphing exists.

What is your point as far as disproving any of the massive amount of evidence we have that shows that Flight 93 was hijacked and crashed at Shanksville?
 
BigAl said:
No such voice morphing exists.

What is your point as far as disproving any of the massive amount of evidence we have that shows that Flight 93 was hijacked and crashed at Shanksville?
Click to expand...


Ummm... You might want to reread his comment.
 
BigAl said:
No such voice morphing exists.

What is your point as far as disproving any of the massive amount of evidence we have that shows that Flight 93 was hijacked and crashed at Shanksville?
Click to expand...
I was being a dope. If truthers can spout non sensical gibberish, I figured I'd fling some back.
 
bio said:
The call, which the operator received and was talking about, was recorded. Then this recorded call was confiscated. What happened then?
Click to expand...
great question. what happened then?

does it matter? The family members state it was their relatives who called them. The records show the calls came from flight 93 and flight 77.

gee... conspiracy in the thousands, or people fearing for their lives on hijacked jets calling loved ones?

and why bother faking the calls? Wouldn't it be easier just to crash them into the ground and let them use authentic phone calls?

I could be, that the recorded call, which the relatives later heart, was a product of voice morphing, not the original call.
Click to expand...

I could be, very sure that, your ability, with english, particularly the use of commas, is non existant.

Massive run on sentences not withstanding, are you trying to say that the original calls which the family members heard, may have been altered AFTER the fact with voice morphing technology?

to what ends? for what purpose? If you alter the audio tapes, the families would state that they were altered.

There was plenty of time, to duplicate the original call and alter its content.
Click to expand...

massive conspiracy involving so many extra moving parts... or 19 hijackers crashing 4 jets and killing 3,000 people..... hmmmmm..... let me think about that.
 
Jackanory said:
So your saying that the operator actually received the call - correct?

Then this original recording, that you accept took place, was confiscated and changed?

Why then would that original recording need voice morphing? What are you suggesting was on the original call, that you accept, that needed to be duplicated and altered?

Please, i am enthralled.
Click to expand...

straw man or proof, that I claimed the original call was a product of voice morphing. I have been writing of that, what the relatives heart.

you are on the right track, understanding me.:)
 
bio said:
straw man or proof, that I claimed the original call was a product of voice morphing. I have been writing of that, what the relatives heart.

you are on the right track, understanding me.:)
Click to expand...

At least somebody is because your posts don't make a stitch of sense.

edit -- I see you're mistaking heart for heard (preterite of to hear). Your posts still don't make sense.
 
Last edited:
Wolrab said:
I was left a voice mail from work today asking if I wanted to work tonight. Is it possible someone stole the original recording and replaced it with another that sounded just like Michele from the Staffing Office?
The US Department of Messing With Recordings and Voice Morphing, once created, would be like any other government agency. Their budget would increase every year and new layers of bureaucracy would accrue. Follow the money!
Click to expand...

The US Department of Interwebs Messing is altering posts, making it appear as if bio and jammonius are delusional. Why? Because of the oil. Robots are stealing my luggage.
 
bio said:
straw man or proof, that I claimed the original call was a product of voice morphing. I have been writing of that, what the relatives heart.

you are on the right track, understanding me.:)
Click to expand...

Let me make it quite clear. I do not understand you.

To be able to understand you, you must first have something that is understandable. You must then be capable of expressing your view in such a way that we can understand it. You must then be capable of presenting evidence/proof of your view/theory so that we can make a logical judgement of it.

So far all you have done is to repeat the same crackerjack theory that you have probably repeated before but using a morphed sock.

With each and every post all you prove is that you find it easy to believe silly things that occupy your mind. Stupid is catching. Well done.

Maybe your time would be best spent using the brain cells that your mother gave you to find the evidence that counters the victims families, the telephone company records, the operators, the FDR, the CVR, the ATC, the DNA, the airlines, the FAA, the FBI, the NTSB, the coroner, the coroners assistant, local police, local press, local residents etc etc etc.

Or you can just continue to piss on the graves of those killed, slag those who worked in horendous conditions to give some comfort to the families and snigger whilst you gain a rise and kudos post counts by posting on JREF.
 
bio said:
your personal attacks prove, that you understood me quite properly. :D
Click to expand...

Ya got that right - HLAS:D

Your lack of proof and evidence proves you dont understand me:rolleyes:

I am sure that you will remain consistant.
 
Does anyone..ANYONE..have any information relating to the original audio, or transcript thereof, where it was reported on the news by Mr (name escapes me) , who was/is apparently Mr. Shaws supervisor, that Mr. Felt heard an explosion or saw smoke?

If you do, please share. I am unable to uncover this information, and wish to ascertain of this was actually reported, or is just another in twoofer lore.

If this is indeed true, then may we freely speculate or pontificate as to why this (smoke and explosion) was stated?

Please address

Carl
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom