• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Ed]Hardfire with Mark Roberts and Arthur Scheuerman

Excellent show. I only wish you had an opponent. Where is the call-in segment?
 
Thanks to Ron, Mark and Arthur Scheuerman.
Would have been interesting to see Gage on the show.
A. Scheuerman: "Nearly everything he said was questionable."

Great.
 
Excellent show. I only wish you had an opponent. Where is the call-in segment?


The tape of the call-in show, unfortunately, is not available. The producer, Gary Popkin, talks about our upcoming show featuring the ineffable Ace Baker and our difficulties in finding an opponent for the rationalist team:


(Popkin wrote)
The Hardfire program we taped on Tuesday, about the collapse of World Trade Center 7, is on Google Video. BBC-TV was on hand with their camera crew. The program will be cablecast in Brooklyn on March 4 and in Manhattan later.

Arthur Scheuerman, retired battalion chief of the New York City Fire Department and author of Fire in the Skyscraper, was at ground zero on September 11, 2001. He is the firefighting professional, with obvious great respect for his profession and his professional colleagues, of whom he lost hundreds on 9/11. He brings a well-informed calmness and dignity to what is often a shrill discussion. Watch this program and decide for yourself whether he knows exactly what he is talking about and is 100% truthful.

We almost got two truthers to appear on the program, but they backed out at the last second. Marguerite (I forgot her last name) said that she had debunked every one of Mark Roberts' arguments so many times she was not going to waste time doing it again. Paula Gloria said she was not an expert on WTC7, but was concentrating her efforts on showing that no planes hit WTC towers 1 and 2. Hardfire is scheduled to do a program on video compositing on April 24, using video from 9/11 among others as examples of what can and can't be accomplished with the technology. We expect to have as a guest Steven Wright, one of the world's foremost experts on video compositing (no, not the deadpan comedian). Watch for it.

I am planning to write a book called Debunking the Debunker Debunkers as soon as I can figure out on which side of the issue that would leave me.

Gary
 
Admittedly I'm prejudiced, but I think Mark and Arthur conveyed an astonishing amount of information in less than a half-hour.
 
Admittedly I'm prejudiced, but I think Mark and Arthur conveyed an astonishing amount of information in less than a half-hour.

They sure did. Very informative.

I would love to see a CTer come in here and try to refute what Arthur had to say.
 
This isn't on. The show where the pseudoskeptics could lecture unchallenged is going to be shown but the show where truthers actually got to speak has been mysteriously lost.
 
Last edited:
This isn't on. The show where the pseudoskeptics could lecture unchallenged is going to be shown but the show where truthers actually got to speak has been mysteriously lost.

Feel free to refute anything said on that show. We're all ears.
 
Feel free to refute anything said on that show. We're all ears.


I haven't watched it yet.

When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.
 
Feel free to refute anything said on that show. We're all ears.

Indeed. Do you have better knowledge of the damage done to WTC7 than that firechief Jharrow? Or is he "in" on it too?

Great show though guys. Just when you think you know all there is to know about a topic you get a little more information. The twoof movement should take note of that.
 
I haven't watched it yet.

When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.

Just so we're clear, you cannot, in fact, refute anything said on the show; is that correct?
 
I haven't watched it yet.

When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.

If you would have watched the damn show before commenting on it you would know that they tried to get conspiracy theorists on and no one wanted to do it. Please withhold further comment until you watch the video that is being discussed here. Anything else is thread hijacking and/or trolling.
 
When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.

Who said he was unbiased?

How many dissenting opinions did Dylan have in his little shows? How often does Alex Jones have on structural engineers who believe the evidence does not support CD or inside job?
 
When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.

If you can find some with stones to actually show up, I'm sure he'd be more than happy to comply.
 
I haven't watched it yet.

When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.

He admits to be biased. Nothing wrong with that. Go watch the show.
 
If you can find some with stones to actually show up, I'm sure he'd be more than happy to comply.

I would happily appear on his show for the full half hour talking about building 7. I'm sure most of the truth movement would do it.

This "can't find anyone to appear" is total bull.
 
I would happily appear on his show for the full half hour talking about building 7. I'm sure most of the truth movement would do it.

This "can't find anyone to appear" is total bull.

Discussion of the lack of opponents has beenwidely discussed already on the forum, including on the lead-up thread to this program. Please restrict this discussion to the actual show itself - as broadcast, so I don't have to split out more posts.

I'm finding my time on this forum more and more interrupted lately with splitting out stuff.
 

Back
Top Bottom