• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Ed]Hardfire with Mark Roberts and Arthur Scheuerman

I would happily appear on his show for the full half hour talking about building 7. I'm sure most of the truth movement would do it.

This "can't find anyone to appear" is total bull.

Sure, most of the truth movement would love to rant uncontested for 30 minutes, that's the only way they can make an argument, uncontested. But the fact that no truthers want to be contested is the very reason Mark and Arthur were not contested. If you would happily appear, why did you not answer Ron's open call for someone to appear on behalf of the CT side? You don't need to answer that. The answer is already known.
 
Discussion of the lack of opponents has beenwidely discussed already on the forum, including on the lead-up thread to this program. Please restrict this discussion to the actual show itself - as broadcast, so I don't have to split out more posts.

I'm finding my time on this forum more and more interrupted lately with splitting out stuff.

Ok, I will go watch it and return to tear it to shreds.
 
This isn't on. The show where the pseudoskeptics could lecture unchallenged is going to be shown but the show where truthers actually got to speak has been mysteriously lost.


This is why rational people lose patience and call members of the tinfoil-hat brigade "loons," "frauds," "charlatans," "liars," and other uncomplimetary terms. I tried everything I could think of to produce an opponent for Mark and Arthur. Nobody--NOBODY--would step up to the plate. You have no criticism for the cowards in the movement you serve. Instead you pretend, unconvincingly, to be concerned about a tape that got messed-up. If you're so curious about the calls we received, go to SLC, find the section on the call-in show, and read the hundreds of posts there. No, the bad guys didn't produce their long-sought smoking gun. There were the expected dumb questions and rock-headed attempts to filibuster, redeemed by Ryan Mackey's contribution near the end of the show. There is no mystery.
 
Last edited:
I haven't watched it yet.

When will pomeroo be having 2 conspiracy theorists on the show to lecture about building 7? We wouldn't want him to apper biased or anything.


Find them for me. They're all cowards, you know.
 
Ok, I will go watch it and return to tear it to shreds.

Do keep in mind that you must have proof to back up your claims. For example in the show the chief gave his expert opinion that the building was going to collapse along with everyone else who was at GZ who thought it was going to collapse. If you are going to say otherwise, you must present proof for your claim. I am anxious to see what you come up with.
 
I would happily appear on his show for the full half hour talking about building 7.
Please do. When "JHarrow" is confirmed to actually be Paul Doherty of Manchester the mods can finally ban you until you register your next sock puppet.
 
Great! Arthur has already backed up my point that these collapse zones are standard procedure and weren't peculiar to wtc7.
 
Great! Arthur has already backed up my point that these collapse zones are standard procedure and weren't peculiar to wtc7.



Your point? That's everybody's point! Such zones are standard because everyone involved knows that collapse is a risk when buildings are on fire!
 
Last edited:
To be fair, I don't think Arthur is qualified. I'm sure he was great firefighter but he is not a structural engineer/
 
ok, to save the mod area from an inundation, please everyone stop personalising these threads, and stop derailing them with sockpuppet accusations.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero


ETA: posts moved to AAH
 
Last edited:
Again, Arthur backs up my point that the firefighting operations in 7 were stopped because of a lack of water pressure, not because of the severity of the fires.
 

Back
Top Bottom