Ladewig
I lost an avatar bet.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2001
- Messages
- 28,828
In Randi's encyclopedia, he says: "Dowsers are, generally speaking, very honest, sincere people, and almost always seem absolutely convinced of their abilities. That conviction is not well founded, since all properly performed, comprehensive tests of this particular claim have produced negative results."
I'm not buying it. When an honest and sincere businessman finds that the UK government has suspended exports of his product, that the Independent has reported that his product is directly responsible for 275 preventable deaths, that the JREF has made repeated offers over a period of years to supply $1,000,000 if the product can be shown to work, he steps forward and says, "I will personally demonstrate that the product works." What an honest and sincere businessman does not do is say " "We have been dealing with doubters for 10 years. One of the problems we have is that the machine does look a little primitive. We are working on a new model that has flashing lights."
The next question then is: Are the sellers culpable if they SHOULD have known their product was a worthless piece of junk risking people's lives. It might be easier to convict someone like McCormick of homicide, for recklessly causing the death of innocent Iraqi citizens, rather than trying to prove he knew his product did not work. Unless you have testimony, e-mail, or phone calls where he admitted it was a scam, it would be hard to prove criminal intent of defrauding people. IMHO, it is much easier to prove that countless tests have been done on dowsing and it never works significantly better than random guessing, so the seller was reckless or at least negligent for selling what is an utterly defective product.
Proving fraud will be a difficult task. Of course, while it could never happen, there is a simple and quick method of determining how much faith this company's executives have in the product. Give each of them one of these products and allow them to demonstrate the product's power by walking across a live minefield. The only potential drawback is that a sincere but misguided executive who really believes that the product works will take the challenge and kill himself attempting to demonstrate the product. Given that these men's incompetence killed at least 275 innocent people, I consider such a mistake a small price to pay.
