Merged [Ed] Convicted Lockerbie bomber released

Cicero said:
Could you define what "best" means in Scotland?


"But Dr Zac Latif, a consultant urologist at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley, has now confirmed he never met or spoke to Dr Fraser and had no idea how he had concluded al-Megrahi only had three months to live."
Click to expand...

Can you confirm that Fraser had to meet this guy? You do know this guy was not the only guy involved?
 
Cicero said:
3) And that the authorities actually check out the qualifications of the medical personnel being relied upon for their advice.
Click to expand...

Now I know you are just telling lies. Sikora was relied on for nothing by the Scots.

You do know that Fraser said the 3 month was a reasonable estimate don't you? You wouldnt make stupid claims while being ignorant of that fact would you?
 
funk de fino said:
Now I know you are just telling lies. Sikora was relied on for nothing by the Scots.

You do know that Fraser said the 3 month was a reasonable estimate don't you? You wouldnt make stupid claims while being ignorant of that fact would you?
Click to expand...

Do you have any firsthand knowledge of al-Megrahi medical records? No? Then why do you make noises that you know more than anyone else? If everything is Kosher about the release, why are Salmond, MacAskill and Straw not cooperating by turning over these records?

Scottish government urged to release Megrahi's medical records

"It is clear that there was no consensus among specialists treating al-Megrahi's prostate cancer that he had only three months to live."

It went on: "The lack of consensus and clarity from any of the specialists involved is very troubling, especially the lack of confidence on the part of the treating oncologist, who was the most qualified to assess the worsening of Mr al-Megrahi's condition."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...release-megrahis-medical-records-2049450.html

US senators last night announced that a controversial inquiry into the release of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing had been postponed due to a lack of witnesses.

The move came after First Minister Alex Salmond, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and former UK Justice Minister Jack Straw all declined a request to give evidence to the inquiry, which was scheduled to take place in Washington tomorrow.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...ahi-inquiry-1.1044171?localLinksEnabled=false
 
Cicero said:
If everything is Kosher about the release, why are Salmond, MacAskill and Straw not cooperating by turning over these records?
Click to expand...

Because our Government isn't answerable to yours, nor should it be.


"It is clear that there was no consensus among specialists treating al-Megrahi's prostate cancer that he had only three months to live."

It went on: "The lack of consensus and clarity from any of the specialists involved is very troubling, especially the lack of confidence on the part of the treating oncologist, who was the most qualified to assess the worsening of Mr al-Megrahi's condition."
Click to expand...

Did you actually read the article? You know that's a quote from the US Senators, not a medical opinion, right?
 
Architect said:
Because our Government isn't answerable to yours, nor should it be.
Click to expand...

Is it answerable to Scottish politicians?

"Annabel Goldie, a Conservative Party lawmaker in Scotland's Parliament, said she agrees that the medical advice which prompted al-Megrahi's release should be disclosed in full."

"We've never seen that medical evidence. We now know from the prison doctor that the cancer experts were not absolute in their view that al-Megrahi only had three months to live, so there is a lot of confusion here," she said."
 
Cicero said:
Do you have any firsthand knowledge of al-Megrahi medical records? No? Then why do you make noises that you know more than anyone else? If everything is Kosher about the release, why are Salmond, MacAskill and Straw not cooperating by turning over these records?

Scottish government urged to release Megrahi's medical records

"It is clear that there was no consensus among specialists treating al-Megrahi's prostate cancer that he had only three months to live."

It went on: "The lack of consensus and clarity from any of the specialists involved is very troubling, especially the lack of confidence on the part of the treating oncologist, who was the most qualified to assess the worsening of Mr al-Megrahi's condition."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...release-megrahis-medical-records-2049450.html

US senators last night announced that a controversial inquiry into the release of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing had been postponed due to a lack of witnesses.

The move came after First Minister Alex Salmond, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and former UK Justice Minister Jack Straw all declined a request to give evidence to the inquiry, which was scheduled to take place in Washington tomorrow.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/...ahi-inquiry-1.1044171?localLinksEnabled=false
Click to expand...

I know more than you. You have proved that by even mentioning Sikora. try again.

Why should the UK or Scottish govt do anything for a few jackass moron senators?
 
Cicero said:
Is it answerable to Scottish politicians?

"Annabel Goldie, a Conservative Party lawmaker in Scotland's Parliament, said she agrees that the medical advice which prompted al-Megrahi's release should be disclosed in full."

"We've never seen that medical evidence. We now know from the prison doctor that the cancer experts were not absolute in their view that al-Megrahi only had three months to live, so there is a lot of confusion here," she said."
Click to expand...

Stop digging.
 
Cicero said:
Already covered Professor Karol Sikora's dishonor and Dr Andrew Fraser's incompetence. Unless al-Megrahi actually died 9 months ago, what further research is necessary to recognize (as the Obama administration does) the stupidity of Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill decision?
Click to expand...

Careful what you wish for cicero, he was freed as an alternative to his appeal being heard.

His appeal would of succeeded on several grounds, and would have shown an innocent man had been wrongly convicted.

The C.I.A. F.B.I and the scottish judiciary did not want that, so he was freed on the pretense of 3 months to live.


For confirmation of the above, and also the evidence tampering and bribery involved in the conviction by the C.I.A. please consult the threads started here by rolfe.
I told you to be careful what you wish for already havent i ?.
 
Alt+F4 said:
You're right, they shouldn't. The 270 families of the victims might appreciate it though.
Click to expand...

Why should be involved in this dog and pony show. I am sure that is not what the families want. The senators want BP. It is a CT of 911 CT proportions and we are correct to blank these morons.

You do know we had many killed as well eh? They have given the US all the information they wanted and now what do they want? To get made fools of like the time they tried this with another Scot Gorgeous George?
 
manxman said:
His appeal would of succeeded on several grounds, and would have shown an innocent man had been wrongly convicted.
Click to expand...

Why would you think his appeal would have been successful if you think he was railroaded to begin with? Wouldn't the same powers that secured his conviction also make sure his appeal failed?

The C.I.A. F.B.I and the scottish judiciary did not want that, so he was freed on the pretense of 3 months to live.
Click to expand...

So you think the whole "compassion" angle was a lie?
 
Alt+F4 said:
Why would you think his appeal would have been successful if you think he was railroaded to begin with? Wouldn't the same powers that secured his conviction also make sure his appeal failed?



So you think the whole "compassion" angle was a lie?
Click to expand...

I also said see the threads rolfe started didnt i.
You want educated, then read, i am not going to spoon feed you.
 
funk de fino said:
Yes, same as the BP hearings. It's a CT of epic proportions. TV dinners for gullible clowns in the US. They could not even get the difference between the Scots govt and the UK govt.
Click to expand...

My question marks were referring to your post about a "dog and pony show". You didn't say who should be involved.
 
Alt+F4 said:
I asked YOU a question. If you don't want to answer it, fine.
Click to expand...



And ive told you to get your answers from rolfes threads about the subject.

There is no way i could put the facts better nor will i try to repeat them whilst they are there already.
 
Last edited:
manxman said:
And ive told you to get your answers from rolfes threads about the subject.

There is no way i could put the facts better nor will i try to repeat them whilst they are there already.
Click to expand...

I've read Rolfe's threads and posts and I know her opinions on the subject, but I'm asking YOU why YOU think an appeal would have been successful. It seems your answer is because Rolfe says so, which is fine, but then why even bother posting in the first place?
 
Baiting will get you no further than you have already gotten with me.
And if as stated you have already read all the legal documents / court transcripts etc presented, plus the thoughts of various scottish legal eagles, then you would already be aware of what i stated, so either your aware and trolling, or lying and have not read the threads.
 
manxman said:
Baiting will get you no further than you have already gotten with me.
And if as stated you have already read all the legal documents / court transcripts etc presented, plus the thoughts of various scottish legal eagles, then you would already be aware of what i stated, so either your aware and trolling, or lying and have not read the threads.
Click to expand...

You're new here, so I'll let this go. Have a good day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom