And I should add to this point: @Hercules56 You keep asking what due process he was denied. It is in ill-formed question. There is no "proper due process" for being shipped to an overseas concentration camp. It is beyond what the government is permitted to do in any circumstance.
Wrong.
If that is the case, than we should not be discussing the Garcia issue in this thread as it has nothing to do with a lack of Due Process.
That certainly is terrible if it's true, but I'd want to see a little further evidence and a little more followup. Among other things, I don't know of any way the authorities would know, from the passport, about the citizenship of his parents.
This sounds like a hoax.
Nitpicking, I think, at best. If due process is supposed to occur, and it does not, what part of "lack" is unfulfilled? Administrative error inherently omits due process when it should occur, and the contemptuous refusal to amend the error inherently denies due process when it should be corrected. There's no due process hiding in there.
No, in this case the administrative error totally ignores the Due Process that Garcia received when the judge ordered his deportation to El Salvador be suspended indefinitely. This case is not about a lack of Due Process, its about an administration refusing to reverse an obvious mistake.
You keep asserting "mistake." There's been remarkably little reason to believe that the "mistake" wasn't completely intentional, though, and plenty of reason to believe that the Trump Administration did it as part of an effort to simply bypass due process for many and pave the way for more violations of due process. The case is very much about whether the Trump Administration can get away with denying due process on some arbitrary pretext. That due process isn't the sole issue at hand doesn't even remotely negate that, squirm as you may.
No, if the mistake was intentional it was because Trump doesn't want possible illegal alien gang-members receiving favors from the USA.
That's quite the assertion of facts not in reasonable evidence, and that would still be damning regardless.
Yes if a judge makes an order only another judge can reverse it. Or pass a new law.
By "favors," it appears you mean due process. An intentional mistake intended to make "possible" certain and to bypass due process. If an operation occurs in which the thing desired does not happen, it is not happening. The exact mechanism or phrasing whereby it doesn't happen ceases to matter if it doesnt, then doesn't again, and doesn't still, and never will.
It was because Trump wants to punish as many brown people as he can. It has nothing to do with legality, or gangs, or crime. It's just another declaration to MAGA that White Supremacy is what Trump's Regime is about.
They are definitely doing it on purpose.
I'm surprised AOC hasn't got an email like that yet.
