• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Due process in the US

Excellent. He's finally getting due process as is his right under Articles 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which the United States is a co-author and signatory.
And since when have Trump and the MAGNAists ever cared about a treaty the USA has signed and ratified?

:sdl:
 
Not according to the indictment.

"The indictment alleged that Abrego Garcia made more than 100 trips transporting undocumented immigrants between Texas and Maryland, among other states.
According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, citing co-conspirators' testimony, Abrego Garcia also allegedly abused undocumented immigrant women and solicited nude photographs and videos from a minor."


I know I'm a bleeding heart liberal but I wouldn't rush to convict a man based on anything that Pam Bondi said. To be honest, I wouldn't believe her if she gave me instructions on how to get to the nearest coffee machine.
 

Huh. The poster boy for the fight for Due Process Rights. Held up as a hero, an innocent "Maryland Man", a loving father, loving husband.

Will be brought back to the USA to face charges of human smuggling.

I knew this guy was bad news. I knew making him the hero would come back to haunt us.

I knew it.

Luckily the fight for Due Process for all persons in the USA has moved passed this wife-beating, gang-banger associating loser.
You still don't understand what due process is or why it's important.

And you're a great example for anyone who wants to argue that he won't get a fair trial to use.
 
Last edited:
Because MAGA have spent several months telling Hercules56 that Abrego Garcia is a bad oerson.
There is now enough Probable Cause to indict Garcia for human trafficking and other crimes.

Which means its reasonable to believe he is in fact, a bad person.
 
Why was it the responsibility of the driver Abrego Garcia to know the citizenship status of the people he drove?
It is a principle of English law that a person who appears in a police court has done something undesirable, and citizens who take it upon themselves to do unusual actions which attract the attention of the police should be careful to bring these actions into one of the recognized categories of crimes and offences, for it is intolerable that the police should be put to the pains of inventing reasons for finding them undesirable.
R v Haddock (1935) Herbert's Uncommon Law 24 at 26, per Light LCJ.
 
What was the point of sending a small number of illegals to Dijibouti? Asians?


OK, some detail
..after the airplane they were on, which was originally bound for South Sudan, was rerouted mid-trip due to a federal judge's ruling. The court ruling came after multiple people facing deportation fought the Trump administration's effort to send them to South Sudan. Now, their case has reached the Supreme Court, which could issue a ruling at any time.
The migrants are from Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, Mexico and South Sudan. Earlier this week, they were placed on a deportation flight out of Texas. Lawyers representing the eight migrants were told they were being sent to South Sudan, but the Department of Homeland Security declined to confirm the final destination of the flight. "Let's be clear," attorney Jonathan Ryan, who represents one of the migrants on that flight, told NPR on Wednesday morning, "my client has disappeared. I do not know where my client is."
 
Last edited:
There is now enough Probable Cause to indict Garcia for human trafficking and other crimes.

Which means its reasonable to believe he is in fact, a bad person.

in your opinion, does the trump admin have enough credibility to bring this charge against this individual at face value?
 
in your opinion, does the trump admin have enough credibility to bring this charge against this individual at face value?
The DOJ issued an indictment based on Probable Cause that several crimes have been committed.

During arraignment, judge can throw out the charges if the evidence is insufficient to go to trial.
 

Back
Top Bottom