triforcharity
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 13,961
The Infowars article cites Wikipedia as it's primary source that "Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a 'conspiracy theorist'." However, prior to Dr. Neustadt's edits, all his Wikipedia said was this:
It should be noted there were no sources listed on this article, either, other than Piczenik's personal website and IMDB. This is how it looked for six months, right up until the day Infowars ran their story. If you look at the May 4th archives, the information added by the Drneustadt user on May 4th indicates that he was attempting to verify and expand upon Pieczenik's expertise rather than discredit him.
This doesn't necessarily prove or disprove anything - I just found it interesting that Dr. Pieczenik's business partner was (seemingly) the first one editing his Wikipedia after the Infowars article went up. I also thought maybe some of his information could be used in further piecing together who exactly Pieczenik is supposed to be.
Ah, but here I am, and he certainly can't prove that I don't exist.![]()
Also, he never worked in the State Department under Kissinger, unless he was in a hired position, instead of an appointed position.