Dr. Judy Wood and the Hutchison effect

Further to what I was saying, the rust forms in only a couple of minutes but only a very thin layer which is usually removed the next time the blade is used. It might take a couple of days in the right conditions for it to become unusable. I think part of it is due to the fine scoring on the surface from the abrasion (still feels smooth though) so I'm wondering if anything could have been effectively sand blasted in some way by the dust and debris and if anything in the dust when mixed with water would be acidic.

What was it that rusted?

Structural steel debris and exposed metal on burned-out cars I think.

The vast quantities of dust may have had just such a corrosive effect, they certainly should be included in the possible causes anyway.

Here's a picture I found with two cars, one of which burned down the carport it was in. I think it was an arson case. You can see both vehicles are totally rusted, and the picture must've been taken shortly after the fire, since it hasn't been cleaned up yet. Almost guaranteed the fire dept poured water on the fire as well.

OH DEAR! I just realized the steel beams of the garage have....sagged! from the heat. This picture may debunk two myths at once!


 
Last edited:
This one looks good but it doesn't melt anything. It just heats up warheads until the explode on their own. They also don't show the tank trucks of fuel hiding outside range of the camera.

That's impressive. I'm suspect of the tracking ability out in the field though - having seen many CIWS events go south due to bad pneumatics or hydros. Crazy weapon like that's only as reliable as its tracking system.

Check out the kook's comment on the first page.

The US has race-specific flu, I heard.

Almost stundie-worthy.
 
I started looking into Dr. Wood's Hurricane Erin theories. Dr. Wood has made a connection between the shape of Tesla coils like the ones John Hutchison uses and the shape of hurricanes and tornadoes. She thinks they look similar.

She also notes that tornadoes flip cars upside down, just like on 9/11. She's made a connection with John Hutchison's 'levitation' effects.

Her main issue with Erin seems to be that it was travelling toward the Eastern Seaboard from Bermuda, but there was no evacuation order in NYC. She finds that suspicious, as if 'they' whomever the conspirators supposedly are, deliberately ordered the hurricane to stop near NY, so knew it wouldn't hit land.
But it was supposedly close enough to supply power for the field effects which destroyed the towers, according to Dr. Wood.

Here's a report from the National Hurricane Centre, Nov 2001

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html#TABLE5


Note that on 9/2100 Hurricane warning changed to tropical storm warning and
10/1500 Tropical storm warning discontinued

from table 4.

Also note that shipping reports of wind speeds of the storm just before 9/11 were:

Date/Time 9/1800 Lat 32 Lon 65 windspeed in Knots/35

35 knots doesn't seem like a threat to the Big Apple. But Dr. Judy seems to have overlooked this point.

Oh well, her loss.

I almost forgot, that the storm moved NE sometime late Sept 11 or on Sept 12. Dr. Wood sees this as evidence 'they' ordered it to do so. Maybe someday a flunkie from the NWO will confess to being the hurricane pilot, joystick in hand, from a remote bunker. But probably not.
 
Last edited:
Puh-lease. Everyone knows they steer hurricanes from HAARP.
 
I wrote to Andrew Johnson yesterday (www.checktheevidence.com) and invited him to post on this thread if he has some questions to discuss.

Here's the email I sent:

Hi Andrew,

Hope you are well. As I indicated I would do, I have started a thread on Judy Wood and Hutchison effect. I first tested the waters a bit by bringing up the subject on some other threads, but got very little response.

I threw out a few possible items for discussion, and there have been a number of posts, although NOBODY is arguing your case for you. I thought you might want to pick one or two particular issues which you think are very strongly in your favour, and post them as questions in the thread.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4723023#post4723023

What is the harm with some honest discussion? It doesn't change the facts, only opinions. I do have some ideas about the particular mistakes you and Judy are making but I'm going to withhold that criticism for the time being. I'd like to see what other people come up with.
But my basic issues have to do with the way you are weighing 'evidence' and evaluating speculation. There's nothing wrong with being imaginative and open minded, but you guys seem to be emphasizing speculation to the point where you're dissociating from reality. That can't be good, IMHO.

My goal would be to encourage you to accept that certain things you are now dismissing could in fact be true. Even just acknowledging that, for example, planes may indeed have crashed into the towers, and that the fires may possibly have done enough damage to bring the towers down, would show some sanity and wisdom.

Anyway, while I'm tempted to get into the meat of it, I won't.

best

'alienentity'
 
Awww, this thread brings back the heart rending story of love and love lost. Poor Ace Baker, jilted by his innamorata Judy Wood, she left him for the dashing hippie stoner scientist, Hutchinson. And Ace (and Unca Fetzer) fought back the only way he knew how: with a fake video. And a song.... well I'm not sure about the song.

Judy, we'll always have "Judy Wood Would."
 
4) cars burnt but there were no charred bodies on the streets

And another bullet hole through Judy Woo-woo's foot.

Charred bodies on the street would actually support her theory, because the cars would have caught fire suddenly, leaving people with no chance to abandon them. Belt buckles and cell phones would have set fire to people's clothing.

Twoofers are not deep or far-sighted thinkers, it seems to me.
 
Awww, this thread brings back the heart rending story of love and love lost. Poor Ace Baker, jilted by his innamorata Judy Wood, she left him for the dashing hippie stoner scientist, Hutchinson. And Ace (and Unca Fetzer) fought back the only way he knew how: with a fake video. And a song.... well I'm not sure about the song.

Judy, we'll always have "Judy Wood Would."

Poor Ace. jilted even by the mentally ill

who can forget the wood/Jenkins video after which she claimed she was "set up" to look like an idiot

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
I started looking into Dr. Wood's Hurricane Erin theories. Dr. Wood has made a connection between the shape of Tesla coils like the ones John Hutchison uses and the shape of hurricanes and tornadoes. She thinks they look similar.

She also notes that tornadoes flip cars upside down, just like on 9/11. She's made a connection with John Hutchison's 'levitation' effects.

Her main issue with Erin seems to be that it was travelling toward the Eastern Seaboard from Bermuda, but there was no evacuation order in NYC. She finds that suspicious, as if 'they' whomever the conspirators supposedly are, deliberately ordered the hurricane to stop near NY, so knew it wouldn't hit land.
But it was supposedly close enough to supply power for the field effects which destroyed the towers, according to Dr. Wood.

Here's a report from the National Hurricane Centre, Nov 2001

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/2001erin.html#TABLE5


Note that on 9/2100 Hurricane warning changed to tropical storm warning and
10/1500 Tropical storm warning discontinued

from table 4.

Also note that shipping reports of wind speeds of the storm just before 9/11 were:

Date/Time 9/1800 Lat 32 Lon 65 windspeed in Knots/35

35 knots doesn't seem like a threat to the Big Apple. But Dr. Judy seems to have overlooked this point.

Oh well, her loss.

I almost forgot, that the storm moved NE sometime late Sept 11 or on Sept 12. Dr. Wood sees this as evidence 'they' ordered it to do so. Maybe someday a flunkie from the NWO will confess to being the hurricane pilot, joystick in hand, from a remote bunker. But probably not.

I did hear a snippet saying that Huricane Erin (which was huge- bigger than Katrina I heard) was not mentioned in the morning News on 9/11 even though it was hovering off the coast. It should have had it's own little circular symbol on the weather map but it was apparently forgotten about. Just an error i suppose.
 
Last edited:
The error is yours bill.

I did hear a snippet saying that Huricane Erin (which was huge- bigger than Katrina I heard) was not mentioned in the morning News on 9/11 even though it was hovering off the coast. It should have had it's own little circular symbol on the weather map but it was apparently forgotten about. Just an error i suppose.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Erin_(2001)


Hurricane Erin =] was the longest lived hurricane in the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season. The sixth tropical depression, fifth tropical storm, and first hurricane, Erin developed from a tropical wave on September 1. After strengthening to a 60 mph (95 km/h) tropical storm as it moved to the west-northwest, wind shear weakened Erin and caused it to dissipate on September 5. The remnants re-organized into a tropical depression the next day, and Erin strengthened into a hurricane on September 9 while moving northwestward. This was the latest date for the first hurricane of the season since Hurricane Diana on September 10, 1984.[1] Erin quickly intensified and reached peak winds of 120 mph (195 km/h) later on September 9. At its closest approach, Erin passed 105 miles (170 km) east-northeast of Bermuda near peak intensity, and subsequently weakened as it turned to the east. A trough turned Erin to the northeast, and after passing just east of Cape Race, Newfoundland it became extratropical on September 15. The extratropical remnant continued northeastward and lost its identity near Greenland on September 17.
Though it was initially predicted to pass within 15 miles (24 km) of Bermuda, Hurricane Erin caused little damage or effects on the island. Large swells from the hurricane produced rough surf and rip currents along the East Coast of the United States. In Newfoundland, Erin dropped moderate amounts of rain and gusty winds, though no damage was reported. Throughout its path, Erin caused no casualties, no injuries, and minor damage.
 
Agent "bill smith" is doing his job exceptionally well. I'll have to see if I can convince the higher-ups at NWO headquarters to give him a pay raise (or at least an office with a window).
 
If bill smith is interested in how Tesla's work on polyphase AC transmission and the induction motor was seminal to the growth of the electric power industry, I recommend reading The Power Makers: Steam, Electricity, and the Men Who Invented Modern America by Maury Klein.

It really is a shame that someone who made really important contributions to electrical engineering is likely to be remembered as the patron saint of every pseudoscientific technology crank with an internet connection.

Re-reading the whole Directed-energy weapons and the WTC thread, something that stands out for me is Jammonius' constant handwaving about the "effects of DEW", without once explaining what those effects are and how they are produced.

This is just plain wrong. If you claim to recognize a cause by observing its effects, you should be able to explain what the effects are and the mechanism by which they are produced. For example, If I tell you that I diagnosed a bad switch in your console by recognizing the characteristic sound of an intermittent connection, I can both explain how that sound is produced (sudden, irregular changes in the conductance of the connection producing discontinuities in the signal passing through it) and how it is that I recognize it (experience of hundreds of similar problems having the same cause).

No such explanation has ever been forthcoming from Wood or her fanboys. Instead, "DEW" turns out to have the same properties that "therm*te" has for "controlled demolition" troofers- a magical something which has whatever properties are needed for the immediate CT claim, to be invoked like a mantra at all times of doubt.

No scientific or even rational discussion is possible with people who believe in magic.
 
If bill smith is interested in how Tesla's work on polyphase AC transmission and the induction motor was seminal to the growth of the electric power industry, I recommend reading The Power Makers: Steam, Electricity, and the Men Who Invented Modern America by Maury Klein.

It really is a shame that someone who made really important contributions to electrical engineering is likely to be remembered as the patron saint of every pseudoscientific technology crank with an internet connection.

Re-reading the whole Directed-energy weapons and the WTC thread, something that stands out for me is Jammonius' constant handwaving about the "effects of DEW", without once explaining what those effects are and how they are produced.

This is just plain wrong. If you claim to recognize a cause by observing its effects, you should be able to explain what the effects are and the mechanism by which they are produced. For example, If I tell you that I diagnosed a bad switch in your console by recognizing the characteristic sound of an intermittent connection, I can both explain how that sound is produced (sudden, irregular changes in the conductance of the connection producing discontinuities in the signal passing through it) and how it is that I recognize it (experience of hundreds of similar problems having the same cause).

No such explanation has ever been forthcoming from Wood or her fanboys. Instead, "DEW" turns out to have the same properties that "therm*te" has for "controlled demolition" troofers- a magical something which has whatever properties are needed for the immediate CT claim, to be invoked like a mantra at all times of doubt.

No scientific or even rational discussion is possible with people who believe in magic.

Yes indeed. Very well put. I just revisited the infamous Wood interview with Greg Jenkins.
She was constantly trying to make a link to the effect of microwave energy on various objects and the Hutchison/DEW hypothesis. The problem obviously is that she has no conceivable physics explanation for how the molecules would be 'dissociated'. She just seems to skip that part and go straight to the conclusion/assumption.

It seems odd methodology to understand something by not understanding it.:confused:

But I guess in the reverse-universe of WooDom, lack of evidence, and therefore lack of understanding makes the theory stronger somehow. If she ever comes across Occam's Razor she should slit her wrists with it.
 
Yes indeed. Very well put. I just revisited the infamous Wood interview with Greg Jenkins.
She was constantly trying to make a link to the effect of microwave energy on various objects and the Hutchison/DEW hypothesis. The problem obviously is that she has no conceivable physics explanation for how the molecules would be 'dissociated'. She just seems to skip that part and go straight to the conclusion/assumption.

It seems odd methodology to understand something by not understanding it.:confused:

But I guess in the reverse-universe of WooDom, lack of evidence, and therefore lack of understanding makes the theory stronger somehow. If she ever comes across Occam's Razor she should slit her wrists with it.

I can somewhat understand debunkers disliking Truthers but over time the general ambiance on forum boards becomes more balanced and conversational- that is until Judy Woods is mentioned at which time debunkers traditionally fly into a kind of hate-frenzy. Example; AlienEntity's talk here of her 'slitting her wrists'.

I'm sure you all will agree that this is a reaction of the most extreme kind to somebody who is, when all is said and done a minor player in the 9/11 picture. It is akin to Holocaust denial to mention Judy Woods it seems. 'No-planes' gets a fairly strong dose of the same treatment.

Personally I have always found this behaviour intriguing. Maybe we should really go for it and analyse Judy's claims right down to the bone ? Are we all agreed ? lol
 
Last edited:
Maybe we should really go for it and analyse Judy's claims right down to the bone ? Are we all agreed ? lol

It's been done. All of her claims are nonsense. She is crazy and so is anybody that takes her claims seriously. Many twoofers consider her to be disinfo. Perhaps you are disinfo too, bill?
 
It's been done. All of her claims are nonsense. She is crazy and so is anybody that takes her claims seriously. Many twoofers consider her to be disinfo. Perhaps you are disinfo too, bill?

Perhaps there is vastly more disinfo than we know about dtugg ?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom