Dr. Judy Wood and the Hutchison effect

More energy weapons. Duh.


And I'm not kidding. Look it up; that's what TS1234 was saying at one point.
 
Trojan said:
If WTC 1 & 2 resulted from energy weapons, what happened to WTC 7? :boggled:
Click to expand...

I want to know why the thousands of us that were watching the towers burn and collapse are not blind due to the UV radaition from the hot steel. Nobody was handing out smoked glass like they do an a Solar eclipse.
 
She sure liked to throw around that picture of the USAF's YAL-1, or AirBorne Laser project. Maybe she doesn't grasp that the actual capabilities of that system aren't even remotely close to her 9/11 allegations.

The ABL is designed to be employed against TBM's in their boost phase, and it doesn't destabilize it at a molecular level, FFS. The COIL system heats up the fuselage of the missile to the point where it isn't airworthy anymore. With the stresses already on an inflight missile, it doesn't take all that much to stress it out of tolerance.

I'm pretty sure if you pointed that thing right at the WTC and lit it up you might see some extremely localized heat stressing, but probably not much in the way of damage.

You still wouldn't want to stand right in front of it though.
 
JoeyDonuts said:
She sure liked to throw around that picture of the USAF's YAL-1, or AirBorne Laser project. Maybe she doesn't grasp that the actual capabilities of that system aren't even remotely close to her 9/11 allegations.

The ABL is designed to be employed against TBM's in their boost phase, and it doesn't destabilize it at a molecular level, FFS. The COIL system heats up the fuselage of the missile to the point where it isn't airworthy anymore. With the stresses already on an inflight missile, it doesn't take all that much to stress it out of tolerance.

I'm pretty sure if you pointed that thing right at the WTC and lit it up you might see some extremely localized heat stressing, but probably not much in the way of damage.

You still wouldn't want to stand right in front of it though.
Click to expand...

Still, I fail to see how this type of technology can be linked to things like burnt cars. If she's wanting to prove something in a criminal court, she and her supporters face very long odds indeed.

I notice that both she and Morgan Reynolds are theorizing no planes for the WTC as well. She has been scoffing about the 'cartoon' cutout shape of the airplane impacts on the towers.

I thought she was supposed to be a scientist. Maybe she should switch to science-fiction instead; it would suit her better I think.
 
JoeyDonuts said:
She sure liked to throw around that picture of the USAF's YAL-1, or AirBorne Laser project. Maybe she doesn't grasp that the actual capabilities of that system aren't even remotely close to her 9/11 allegations.

The ABL is designed to be employed against TBM's in their boost phase, and it doesn't destabilize it at a molecular level, FFS. The COIL system heats up the fuselage of the missile to the point where it isn't airworthy anymore. With the stresses already on an inflight missile, it doesn't take all that much to stress it out of tolerance.

I'm pretty sure if you pointed that thing right at the WTC and lit it up you might see some extremely localized heat stressing, but probably not much in the way of damage.


You still wouldn't want to stand right in front of it though.
Click to expand...

Here are two "largest" lasers, one the size of three football fields. A little calculation would show how much steel per second it could vaproroze. I'm not going to look up the energy needed to vaporize steel but I bet this would do much less than a gram per second.

This one looks good but it doesn't melt anything. It just heats up warheads until the explode on their own. They also don't show the tank trucks of fuel hiding outside range of the camera.
 
alienentity said:
Another interesting physical phenomenon was rapid rust formation. Any good info on this?
Click to expand...

It is actually totally normal in a fire involving a lot of steel. One of the oldest methods of producing hydrogen gas in a pure form was to pass steam over bare iron in a hot chamber (but not too hot, lest it explode.)

At high temperatures water readily gives up its hydrogen and allows the oxygen to bond with the iron.

Instant rust.
 
BigAl said:
Here are two "largest" lasers, one the size of three football fields. A little calculation would show how much steel per second it could vaproroze. I'm not going to look up the energy needed to vaporize steel but I bet this would do much less than a gram per second.

This one looks good but it doesn't melt anything. It just heats up warheads until the explode on their own. They also don't show the tank trucks of fuel hiding outside range of the camera.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that explains why Dr. Wood is latching onto the Hutchison effect (talk about desperation!) because the 'molecular dissociation' is claimed to require relatively little energy.
The main problem with Hutchison, AFAIK, is that, apart from being an affable raconteur, producing a bunch of poor-quality videos and some ambiguous metal scraps, he's not been able to get his results reproduced by any reputable outfit.

This stuff is great for coffee table banter, but it isn't serious science.
 
leftysergeant said:
It is actually totally normal in a fire involving a lot of steel. One of the oldest methods of producing hydrogen gas in a pure form was to pass steam over bare iron in a hot chamber (but not too hot, lest it explode.)

At high temperatures water readily gives up its hydrogen and allows the oxygen to bond with the iron.

Instant rust.
Click to expand...


thx
 
I have always wondered how a dentist suddenly became an expert on building construction and space based weapons platforms
 
The videos of the Hutchison effect are transparent fakes. Those of dancing and levitating metal objects are done in a plywood box turned upside down while magnet hold the objects in place.

I could produce his blistered metal rods with an acetyline torch. The split-open brass bar would require an enormous weight, but it can be done.

His electricity-producing stone is probably tourmaline. It is a thermocouple and produces electricty when heated on one end and cooled on the other.

His metal bars with imbedded objects look like solder to me. I could imbedded beetles into that without burning them off.

Totally guanophrenic and a stoned liar.
 
alienentity said:
What I mean is, how fast can steel rust under the right conditions?
Click to expand...

I don't know if this is applicable as well as the heat effects on steel but I regularly use Diamond tipped blades which the main body of the blade is steel and during use the steel part suffers some abrasion, if it gets wet even a little from just a few drops of rain the rust forms within minutes.
 
leftysergeant said:
The videos of the Hutchison effect are transparent fakes. Those of dancing and levitating metal objects are done in a plywood box turned upside down while magnet hold the objects in place.

I could produce his blistered metal rods with an acetyline torch. The split-open brass bar would require an enormous weight, but it can be done.

His electricity-producing stone is probably tourmaline. It is a thermocouple and produces electricty when heated on one end and cooled on the other.

His metal bars with imbedded objects look like solder to me. I could imbedded beetles into that without burning them off.

Totally guanophrenic and a stoned liar.
Click to expand...

Apart from the obvious problem of video fakery, I also find a number of other things extremely difficult to believe. One of the standouts for me stems from images of his 'laboratory', which is actually an apartment where he lives, I think. I've never seen an explanation for how all the mysterious energy is somehow focused on the particular objects! (presuming it is really being generated as claimed) It seems to me a large suspension of disbelief is required to imagine that the 'field effects' and 'molecular dissociation' they talk about would not manifest on the generating equipment itself, or any other nearby materials or people, without warning.

Slightly OT, to Hutchison's possible motivations for these probable deceptions - I assume he's truly devoted to the work of Tesla, and really does believe in the possibility of the fx he is claiming. He can't produce them the way he's actually claiming to , but instead has found other ways - maybe he hopes someone will do it for real one day.

If he indeed was genuine, the value of his discoveries would be immense, and he would be a very wealthy man by now. The fact that he chooses relative obscurity/poverty is consistent with a lack of confidence in his work.

Dr. Wood has really jumped the shark by claiming that, not only are these fx real, but the US gubmint has even developed them into a weapon!

 
Last edited:
alexi_drago said:
I don't know if this is applicable as well as the heat effects on steel but I regularly use Diamond tipped blades which the main body of the blade is steel and during use the steel part suffers some abrasion, if it gets wet even a little from just a few drops of rain the rust forms within minutes.
Click to expand...

Keep it coming. I'll refer Andrew Johnson to this thread so perhaps he'll realize just how badly he's been duped by Dr. Wood.
 
alienentity said:
Keep it coming. I'll refer Andrew Johnson to this thread so perhaps he'll realize just how badly he's been duped by Dr. Wood.
Click to expand...

If this is the same Andrew Johnson who was one time administrator of the UK 9/11 CT forum, then you'll have a very hard time. He eagerly embraces all that is woo, then asks for extra woo with double woo topping. In fact, any rational discussion from you will further embed him in his wooishness.
 
GlennB said:
If this is the same Andrew Johnson who was one time administrator of the UK 9/11 CT forum, then you'll have a very hard time. He eagerly embraces all that is woo, then asks for extra woo with double woo topping. In fact, any rational discussion from you will further embed him in his wooishness.
Click to expand...

Yes, the same guy. He's one of Dr. Woods' biggest supporters. His website is www.checktheevidence.com.

You're probably right about him being resistant to rational discussion of evidence. What truther isn't?
 
alienentity said:
Yes, the same guy. He's one of Dr. Woods' biggest supporters. His website is www.checktheevidence.com.

You're probably right about him being resistant to rational discussion of evidence. What truther isn't?
Click to expand...

They don't get worse than Johnson. He has woo on toast for breakfast. You could invent a CT just for fun and he'd drink it down. Best of luck :)
 
alienentity said:
Keep it coming. I'll refer Andrew Johnson to this thread so perhaps he'll realize just how badly he's been duped by Dr. Wood.
Click to expand...

Further to what I was saying, the rust forms in only a couple of minutes but only a very thin layer which is usually removed the next time the blade is used. It might take a couple of days in the right conditions for it to become unusable. I think part of it is due to the fine scoring on the surface from the abrasion (still feels smooth though) so I'm wondering if anything could have been effectively sand blasted in some way by the dust and debris and if anything in the dust when mixed with water would be acidic.

What was it that rusted?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom