pdoherty76
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2006
- Messages
- 571
stellafane hard luck, i have never visited the loose change blog and i never will. avery is a total opportunist and his movie is crap
I am, because he does.
so first hes in it for profit and now he has delusions.
I must admit i wasnt aware of those headlines, Alex Jones is wrong to do that I agree.
Daniel Nigro could not possibly know from experience because 911 was a unique situation.
Any idea by who ?
i have no idea. thats why id like an investigation. u see?
Daniel Nigro could not possibly know from experience because 911 was a unique situation.
Something unclear about this, chief, or do you need larger type?so could gravy and marky please make their mind up, which is it?
stellafane hard luck, i have never visited the loose change blog and i never will. avery is a total opportunist and his movie is crap
Alex Jones would be an anonymous nobody in the mainstream. 9/11 is the best thing that ever happened to him. He found a ready market of people like you ever so willing to fall for his crap.
Hey, you and I agree on something! Glad to here it, seriously.
alex jones was making films and rebuilding churches (desecrated by the US military and police) before 911. he is a hero
Thought you said you read my paper. The screenshots from his websites take up half a page.so first hes in it for profit and now he has delusions.
I must admit i wasnt aware of those headlines, Alex Jones is wrong to do that I agree.
What, exactly, in the over 200 accounts of WTC 7's condition that I collected in that paper, leads you to believe that you are correct and they are not?Daniel Nigro could not possibly know from experience because 911 was a unique situation.
Oh. So when you guys claim that the WTC must have been a CD because fire never brought down a building that size before, it's all total crap because after all, 9/11 was "a unique situation" -- right? Glad to hear you finally admit it.
You know, maybe you're right after all. You're terrible at this.
Thought you said you read my paper. The screenshots from his websites take up half a page.
What, exactly, in the over 200 accounts of WTC 7's condition that I collected in that paper, leads you to believe that you are correct and they are not?
did i not say earlier that you are convincing me about building 7? i may well be joining ur side soon. (waits for someone to say ur side doesnt want me)
I just cant see how they would know it would collapse. they had never seen a building in that condition before so they had no frame of reference
Then why do not you ask them ? Get in touch with this gentleman or the NYFD and ask them.
Right. 32-year FDNY veteran Daniel Nigro, and all the other veteran firefighters on the scene who examined the building, had never seen buildings damaged and on fire before, had never been exposed to building collapses, had never trained for high-rise fires, knew nothing about the behavior of steel in fires.Now explain how nigro knew it would collapse if he hadnt seen any thing like it before
Then why do not you ask them ? Get in touch with this gentleman or the NYFD and ask them.
Right. 32-year FDNY veteran Daniel Nigro, and all the other veteran firefighters on the scene who examined the building, had never seen buildings damaged and on fire before, had never been exposed to building collapses, had never trained for high-rise fires, knew nothing about the behavior of steel in fires.
Guess what, chief?
Two of the largest buildings in the world had collapsed seven hours earlier due to damage and fire, killing 343 FDNY heroes.
What the hell is wrong with you?