love, I am trying to decide whether you are honest in this line of questioning or if you are trolling.
Although I may be coming from a very different viewpoint to you, and certainly had very different experiences, I am interested in what you think and feel. Maybe my interest is that I used to be a very angry person myself. And maybe also because I still feel some anger towards doctors.
Ok let's put it this way:
You have multiple myeloma. Do you attempt to shrink your many tumors using, say, Revlimid, which is tested and shown to have a high effective rate in shrinking tumors (well over 85%) or would you take the sugar pill (20%?)
Well, I would use all my healing tools, and attempt to determine the underlying cause of the disease. I would likely only use Revlimid as a last resort. I would bascially just do, whatever I felt to.
I do use homeopathy. Last time I had dental pain, for example, I treated myself using a homeopathic remedy. I guess I am just one of those 20%. Perhaps I am extra suggestible.
If you choose placebo you are worthy of a Darwin Award.
I think that's an exaggeration, and you know it.
Do you have a point here, or are you just trolling?
No, I'm just kind of curious, because my experience is so different to yours.
Please help me here. What does this stand for?
show me one placebo that puts back the vertabrae destroyed by the tumor I had in my spine.
The Body Mirror System of Healing, for example. It helped cure a family member of scoliosis. There are many others. I could offer you a remote healing. As I am so far away, I am fairly sure you won't punch me in the face.
Are you honestly suggesting that homeopathy could have cured that condition?
The condition, yes. But I am not sure you are open to being cured that way. You seem to have more faith in the miracles of modern medicine.
In the end, I believe people heal when they take responsibility for their own health.
Did you even read the paper, or are you talking out of your rear?
Yes. It seemed very passionately argued.
