Does the IDF target civilians?

And why were the IDF even there to begin with?
Stop clouding the issue with that silly Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades nonsense Web, everyone knows the IDF is in the West Bank to oppress the Palestinians. That is when they are not busy mowing them down with gunfire.


Suing the PA - Nov. 29, 2005 22:01 -

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1132475650162&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Victims of Palestinian terrorism should take note of Palestinian Authority finance minister Salam Fayad's recent resignation. Fayad is said to be particularly upset because PA Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei arranged that the $350 million being donated to the PA in 2005 is paying to employ 60,000 people in the security services. Among these are Palestinian terrorists serving time in Israeli prisons. The prisoners include those who murdered Israelis, suicide bomber dispatchers, and suicide bombers caught en route.

Saadi al-Wahidi, a senior official at the PA's Civil Service Administration, told the Palestinian newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda on November 16 that the PA has created a special committee to determine the pension eligibility of all members of Palestinian armed organizations such as the Aksa Martyrs Brigade, the Kassam Brigade, Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

The abrupt and angry resignation of Fayad, who was seen by all as the symbol of a new Palestinian system of financial reform, should have resulted in immediate sanctions against the massive corruption in the PA. But the international community has set out to create a Palestinian state, and nothing - not even the PA's admitted sponsorship of convicted terrorists - is likely to stop it.
 
Jocko has now the honour of being the first to get on my ignore list.

Within three weeks, more than 120 Palestinians were killed and over 4,800 injured in clashes with Israeli security forces that began on September 29. Most of the deaths were the result of excessive, and often indiscriminate, use of lethal force by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers, police, and border police against unarmed civilian demonstrators, including children. The casualties were disproportionately on the Palestinian side, but two Israeli soldiers were beaten to death by a Palestinian mob. The large number of deaths and injuries in the clashes and the resulting deteriorating relationship between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and neighboring states greatly overshadowed and put into question certain human rights improvements, notably, an apparent decrease in the use of torture by Israeli interrogators, a reduction in the hostages and administrative detainees Israel held, and fewer revocations of Jerusalem residency permits. In several cases the Israeli government also actively sought to thwart court rulings supporting human rights by supporting initiatives to legalize torture and hostage-taking, and by delaying the enforcement of court rulings against discrimination. On July 24, the Knesset voted to extend the fifty-two-year-old state of emergency until January 26, 2001, to allow the government time to enact similar powers into statute law.
http://www.hrw.org/wr2k1/mideast/israel.html
 
Jocko is only your run of the mill jerk. You are much more pernicious than that. I want to keep an eye on your male bovine manure.
 
This is what I don't get about guys like Orwell. All of us, including him, agree abuses happen. I would go so far as to say that no military force in the world has a clean bill of health. Humans are fallible and at some point the humans who make up these armies have moments of bad judgement, or many moments. Does that mean in the case of the IDF it target's civilians? I don't think so.

The part some people forget is the Palestinians have been terrorizing Israel since the 1960s. This fact is often dismissed by those same people as "a play to emotion". Hell, for 30 years the entire Palestinian Nationalism movement was based upon terrorizing Israel and destroying it.

The Palestine National Charter

Article 15. The liberation of Palestine is a national obligation for the Arabs. It is their duty to repel the Zionist and imperialist invasion of the greater Arab homeland and to liquidate the Zionist presence in Palestine.
(emphasis mine)

Today the entire Hamas and Islamic Jihad movements are based upon terrorizing Israel and destroying it with violence.

This Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), clarifies its picture, reveals its identity, outlines its stand, explains its aims, speaks about its hopes, and calls for its support, adoption and joining its ranks. Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps. The Movement is but one squadron that should be supported by more and more squadrons from this vast Arab and Islamic world, until the enemy is vanquished and Allah's victory is realised.

http://www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/hamas.htm
(emphasis mine)...the word is jew everyone not Israeli.

All these groups who have been terrorizing the people of Israel have had one thing in common, they were Palestinian and they justified their terror under the banner of Palestinian Nationalism. So is it unreasonable to believe that after 35 years of this terrorism some jews and Israelis don't trust, or even like, Palestinians? Wow. What a mind-blowing revelation.

Eventually the argument shall be made that Israel is the real aggressor and if Israel wasn't occupying Gaza and the West Bank these organizations wouldn't be terrorizing. Then I will inform them - with documentation - that the terrorizing of Israel began prior to the occupation of Gaza or the West Bank. Then they will argue that a "jewish Israel" is an abomination anyways and a mistake in the first place then I will inform them - with documentation - that the terrorizing of jews began prior even to the formation of Israel - (See: Mohammad Amin al-Husayni).

Then once that chicken or egg debate peters out the goalposts shall move back into the present and I may have to spend one or two pages repeatedly posting the PLO Charter & Hamas Covenant and spend hours splitting hairs over the meanings of "liquidate the Zionist presence in Palestine" and "Our struggle "against the Jews is very great and very serious".

Then the thread will go full circle back into spamming Israeli human rights abuses. It's always the same. :rolleyes:
 
Can I be the second?

It's not that easy. First you have to get Orwell to [Rule 8] himself in the [Rule 8] and let him think he's won a point. THEN, after he realizes what a [Rule 8] he's been exposed for, only then do you get added to the roll of honor. ;)
 
This is what I don't get about guys like Orwell. All of us, including him, agree abuses happen. I would go so far as to say that no military force in the world has a clean bill of health. Humans are fallible and at some point the humans who make up these armies have moments of bad judgement, or many moments. Does that mean in the case of the IDF it target's civilians? I don't think so.

Some people just can't handle it when their invective isn't matched by the facts. But considering the stresses puberty can put on a confused lad, I don't hold him personally responsible.
 
Some people just can't handle it when their invective isn't matched by the facts.
I find most people who are anti-Israeli have never set foot in Israel. They have no idea what the real Israeli is like, it's complex, chaotic.. but ultimately, a benevolent society to all races and religions.

I remember the constant PLO terror in the 70s and 80s and think how come Osama Bin Laden isn't cut any slack today but the Palestinian Authority is. Hell, everyone knows Arafat's legacy and that the Palestinian Authority used to be called the PLO. Some even might know Mahmoud Abbas was the PLO finance wizard behind the Munich massacre - you know that little "play for emotion" us pro-Israelis types like to use in emergencies for a propoganda tool. :rolleyes:

Yet even today, after several internationally-brokered and signed treaties with Israel, the Palestinian Authority still allows known terrorists in Hamas, Islamic Jihad and it's very own Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades to operate with impunity in Palestinian Authority-controlled areas. The Taliban let Al Queda run around Afghanistan and look what happened to them. America went half way around the world and removed them tout sweet. This conflict between Israel and the Palestinian terror groups has been raging since Arafat's Fatah first tried to attack the Israeli National Water Carrier on January 3, 1965! Two years before any occupation.

Yet Israel is not allowed to wipe out the PA like the Taliban or destroy Hamas like Al Queda. Instead Israel is scolded on the international stage because it opposes Hamas - who is dedicated to Israel's destruction and has murdered scores of Israelis - to participate in the upcoming Palestinian elections. To oppose such Hamas participation is obstructing "Palestinian" democracy.

WTF? Is the world gone mad? Why yes it has.

So when guys like Orwell, and a few others here at JREF, decide to expose Israeli "crimes" page after page after page I have to wonder, what is their motivation? Why do they lothe Israel so much and seem to whitewash the Palestinian people's decades-long involvement in terrorism. Israel is not out to wipe out the Middle East and take over, but you can sure as hell be sure that Hamas, Islamic Jihad - and formerly the PLO - WHO ARE ALL PALESTINIANS! - are trying desperately to wipe out Israel and every jewish man, woman and child in it.

Incase anyone forgot:

The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS)-Palestine

This Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), clarifies its picture, reveals its identity, outlines its stand, explains its aims, speaks about its hopes, and calls for its support, adoption and joining its ranks. Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious. It needs all sincere efforts. It is a step that inevitably should be followed by other steps. The Movement is but one squadron that should be supported by more and more squadrons from this vast Arab and Islamic world, until the enemy is vanquished and Allah's victory is realised.

So what makes guys like Orwell hate Israel so much when there are far far greater evils out there responsible for this mess?
 
Last edited:
So what makes guys like Orwell hate Israel so much when there are far far greater evils out there responsible for this mess?

Well, had you been paying even the tiniest smidgen of attention, you would have realised long ago that I don't hate Israel. I just happen to think that Israeli security doesn't justify massive human rights abuses. But I don't think you're mentally equipped to deal with that level of nuance, so I won't insist, eh?
 
Your method of thinking is wrong then.

So you believe that Israeli security justifies massive human rights abuses? Ok then. Gotta hand it to you, your honesty is refreshing. That's exactly what a nationalist (which is a particular kind of partisan hack) would think, but very few would dare say it out loud. Just look at how Mycroft dances around the issue, and spins and obfuscates his way out of it!
 
Last edited:
So you believe that Israeli security justifies massive human rights abuses? Ok then. Gotta hand it to you, your honesty is refreshing. That's exactly what a nationalist (which is a particular kind of partisan hack) would think, but very few would dare say it out loud. Just look at how Mycroft dances around the issue, and spins and obfuscates his way out of it!
Whoaa there, little buckaroo. You're moving the goalposts. "Does the IDF target civilians?" is the question. You have not proved they do, though I have enjoyed watching you squirm and twist and obsfucate in this thread.
 
Whoaa there, little buckaroo. You're moving the goalposts. "Does the IDF target civilians?" is the question. You have not proved they do, though I have enjoyed watching you squirm and twist and obsfucate in this thread.

I presented more than a few links that proved my point. But that didn't register, did it? You just don't wanna hear it. But I'm not that surprised... The other thing that typically characterises your average partisan hack is his indifference to reality: there are certain things he will never admit, no matter how much evidence you present.

As George Orwell put it:
If one harbours anywhere in one's mind a nationalistic loyalty or hatred, certain facts, although in a sense known to be true, are inadmissible. Here are just a few examples. I list below five types of nationalist, and against each I append a fact which it is impossible for that type of nationalist to accept, even in his secret thoughts:
BRITISH TORY: Britain will come out of this war with reduced power and prestige.
COMMUNIST: If she had not been aided by Britain and America, Russia would have been defeated by Germany.
IRISH NATIONALIST: Eire can only remain independent because of British protection.
TROTSKYIST: The Stalin regime is accepted by the Russian masses.
PACIFIST: Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.
All of these facts are grossly obvious if one's emotions do not happen to be involved: but to the kind of person named in each case they are also intolerable, and so they have to be denied, and false theories constructed upon their denial.

Now I may add something more to that list...

Israeli nationalist: Israel doesn't target (shoot at, attack, whatever) Arab civilians.
 
Last edited:
Time to Pick and Choose Sides

I'm much more than a 'partisan hack', Orwell.
I am an Israeli citizen, still officially in the IDF reserves, and have been working for Israel's defense-industry over 18 years, hold an extremely high security clearance issued by the State of Israel. I bring that all forward in this conversation only to show that I know a thing or two about the workings of the Israeli security establishment.
If you read through the replies in this forum, you'll see that everyone agrees your illustrations of IDF 'abuses' are essentially correct, nobody is arguing that the information is wrong. Israeli troops have killed thousands. Israeli troops break down doors and bulldoze homes and orchards and destroy bridges and rip up roads. Israeli troops shell and bomb. Israeli troops have incarcerated thousands of Palestinians without trials, and even tortured people.

Nowhere, Orwell, is that even in dispute. No, you cannot point to Mycroft, ZN, Webfusion, WildCat, Cleopatra, Skeptic or anyone who has rejected as lies the linked information you offered since page one here. That information is essentially correct, as far as it goes.

Our problem is a widespread inclination (going far beyond the JREF, and extending into many nooks and crannies of the internet community) to present the information in the context of "ISRAEL BAD -- PALESTINIANS INNOCENT"

The IDF does not target the civilian population of the Palestinians, in the same sense that the Palestinian terrorists target the Israeli civilian population.

That is the equation which we are looking at. You are not.
Yeah, we can see you're not, and it is quite frustrating when a fellow (self-proclaimed) skeptic just goes ahead full-steam without reference to the evidence.

You keep asking me to provide my links, my proof, that the IDF does not target civilians. That is proving a negative. I can only show what the IDF actually does, in action. I can only show that the IDF acts as a professional and extremely disciplined and fair army. I can only show how the IDF maintains a level of respect and integrity when dealing day-to-day with the millions of palestinian civilians under occupation or integrated into the State itself as citizens (or in gaza, now un-occupied).
Israeli soldiers do not run around in units shooting people, like the Waffen SS Death Head squads or many other Death-target units throught the ignoble recent past history of Europe, Russia, Africa, Asia, you-name-it. I feel these are the reference points we all are using when you perpetrate the lie that "IDF targets civilians"

The IDF just doesn't perform in that manner, even thought the temptation and the motivation to do so is very great, (especially as Palestinian terror murders continually strike into the Israeli fabric of society).

Yes, that's right, on the other hand, as is proven time and again and demonstrated vividly in the explosions on Israeli busses and cafes and discos and restaurants and streetcorners and shopping malls, the Palestinians, (including a vast cross-section of their civilian population) do exhibit outwardly the violent intent and express their desire to kill jews, and indeed we see 'normal' people equipped (including little children, the shame) to go into Israel & perpetrate murders willy-nilly.

Human rights abuses? Is that your yardstick?
 
Last edited:
I'm much more than a 'partisan hack', Orwell.
I am an Israeli citizen, still officially in the IDF reserves, and have been working for Israel's defense-industry over 18 years, hold an extremely high security clearance issued by the State of Israel. I bring that all forward in this conversation only to show that I know a thing or two about the workings of the Israeli security establishment.
Those are claims that cannot be verified. You could also be a liar with too much free time on your hands. And even if it is true, I don't take arguments from authority very seriously.

If you read through the replies in this forum, you'll see that everyone agrees your illustrations of IDF 'abuses' are essentially correct, nobody is arguing that the information is wrong. Israeli troops have killed thousands. Israeli troops break down doors and bulldoze homes and orchards and destroy bridges and rip up roads. Israeli troops shell and bomb. Israeli troops have incarcerated thousands of Palestinians without trials, and even tortured people.
Well, we agree on something, me and you. Zenith-nadir, however, doesn't seem to agree with us.

Nowhere, Orwell, is that even in dispute. No, you cannot point to Mycroft, ZN, Webfusion, WildCat, Cleopatra, Skeptic or anyone who has rejected as lies the linked information you offered since page one here. That information is essentially correct, as far as it goes.
The articles I linked specifically use words like "IDF attacks civilians", "IDF shells civilians", "IDF soldiers shoot at civilians".

Our problem is a widespread inclination (going far beyond the JREF, and extending into many nooks and crannies of the internet community) to present the information in the context of "ISRAEL BAD -- PALESTINIANS INNOCENT"
See, I think that you are so used to seeing and debating things in that context that you have trouble understanding people who make a distinction between a country's institutions and a country's people. For instance, I loath the present US administration and most of the american foreign policy of the last 50 years, but I do not loath neither the US nor its people. I do not think in terms of Israel bad - Palestinians good. There are victims on both sides, there are murderers on both sides, and the extremists and racists on both sides both use civilian lives as pawns in a morbid game of attack followed by reprisal that has been going on for decades now.

The IDF does not target the civilian population of the Palestinians, in the same sense that the Palestinian terrorists target the Israeli civilian population.
I never claimed that the IDF was a terrorist organisation, ever. As I said before, I'm sure that there are many soldiers in the IDF that behave humanely and follow whatever procedures they're supposed to follow. I am also sure that there are elements in the IDF who don't give a damn, and that the "culture of impunity" mentioned in several of my links has encouraged these elements to target (in the sense of shooting) civilians.

That is the equation which we are looking at. You are not.
Yeah, we can see you're not, and it is quite frustrating when a fellow (self-proclaimed) skeptic just goes ahead full-steam without reference to the evidence.
You decided to interpret my words in a way that would suit your prejudices about those who denounce Israeli and IDF policies and practices in the OT. You assumed that I was saying "Israeli bad - Palestinian good", and you deformed my point to fit that, essentially building a strawman.

You keep asking me to provide my links, my proof, that the IDF does not target civilians. That is proving a negative.
I never asked you to do such a thing.

I can only show what the IDF actually does, in action. I can only show that the IDF acts as a professional and extremely disciplined and fair army. I can only show how the IDF maintains a level of respect and integrity when dealing day-to-day with the millions of palestinian civilians under occupation or integrated into the State itself as citizens (or in gaza, now un-occupied).
By the looks of those links I provided you, your "professional and extremely disciplined and fair army" is either filled with a considerable number of bad shots and trigger happy incompetent clowns who aren't fit to hold a slingshot, or your "professional and extremely disciplined and fair army" has a good number of soldiers who hate palestinians so much that they're incapable of maintaining their professionalism, discipline and fairness when dealing with them.
Israeli soldiers do not run around in units shooting people, like the Waffen SS Death Head squads or many other Death-target units throught the ignoble recent past history of Europe, Russia, Africa, Asia, you-name-it. I feel these are the reference points we all are using when you perpetrate the lie that "IDF targets civilians"
Your reference points, not mine. I never made those comparisons. IDF soldiers have, however, repeatedly used excessive force. As you said before: "Israeli troops have killed thousands. Israeli troops break down doors and bulldoze homes and orchards and destroy bridges and rip up roads. Israeli troops shell and bomb. Israeli troops have incarcerated thousands of Palestinians without trials, and even tortured people." I will add that IDF soldiers have often done these things gratuitously, to innocent people, either out of hatred or out of a desire for vengeance.

The IDF just doesn't perform in that manner, even thought the temptation and the motivation to do so is very great, (especially as Palestinian terror murders continually strike into the Israeli fabric of society).
I deplore Palestinian suicide bombings of Israeli civilians. I think they're terrible events, and I'm completely against the politics that drive these attacks. That being said, I urge you to think about how the occupation and all the IDF abuses I have documented disrupt the fabric of Palestinian society.

Yes, that's right, on the other hand, as is proven time and again and demonstrated vividly in the explosions on Israeli busses and cafes and discos and restaurants and streetcorners and shopping malls, the Palestinians, (including a vast cross-section of their civilian population) do exhibit outwardly the violent intent and express their desire to kill jews, and indeed we see 'normal' people equipped (including little children, the shame) to go into Israel & perpetrate murders willy-nilly.
You are generalising. The terrorist attacks you mentioned have been supported and perpetrated by a small very militant minority. You cannot hold all of the Palestinian population responsible for them, the same way that all the Israeli population cannot be held responsible for IDF abuses. The occupation and all the abuses that go with it will only increase the hatred and cause more pain and suffering. It is the occupation, the abuses and the hatred that goes with it that feeds extremism on both sides.

Human rights abuses? Is that your yardstick?
Yes.
 
Last edited:
Orwell changed the subject

Over and over, you have been told that 'excesses' and 'abuses' and 'shooting at' civilians does not equal "targeting" --- targeting is the subject here, and you have, from the outset, decided to expand the definition to include anything at all that IDF troops have been involved with while in action.
Your thesis is that abuses = targeting. This is an error of the first magnitude.

You say that your intent is to illustrate abuses here. Without stopping to consider that this is not the purpose of the thread, originally, you have repeatedly decided that the word "targeting" can only be defined by Orwell and it means "whatever" you wish it to. You have admitted that yourself! Refer to your own post #39


This single sentence is the ultimate example:
The articles I linked specifically use words like "IDF attacks civilians", "IDF shells civilians", "IDF soldiers shoot at civilians".

Orwell, we know they do. ZN knows they do. The whole world knows they do.
YOU have to step back, as you have been requested to do several times, and ask yourself, "is the IDF going out there, on their missions, with orders, to shoot civilians and murder them?"

It's a very basic point, which you have totally missed.
TMY immediately recognized the point, and said (paraphrasing):
"Hard to prove they do, no documents to refer to"

If you think that the IDF abuses prove that they are targeting civilians, that is a very fundamental mistake in your method of viewing the OP. However, you are free to continue in your confusion, don't let us interfere. Carry on to your hearts' content.
 
The articles I linked specifically use words like "IDF attacks civilians", "IDF shells civilians", "IDF soldiers shoot at civilians".

Well lets revisit YOUR links once again.


Nowhere in this article does it use the word "shelling". Shelling implies implies artillery, the title of this link clearly states the IDF shelled a house with residents still inside, setting it on fire. Yet there is no artillery or shelling mentioned in the entire link...not once. Therefore that link is deliberately misleading that the IDF shells homes with people in them, when it actually did not happen in this case. Nobody on earth refers to gunfire as "shelling". Nobody. Therefore this link documenting that the IDF targets civilians - by shelling - should be apporached with a high degree of scepticism.

Next link.

IDF soldiers kill eleven year-old Palestinian girl in Nablus, September 2004

We heard only one bullet being shot and there were no soldiers in the area. On the radio they announced that the mission was over but the soldiers hadn’t yet left the area. They probably shot my daughter from the house of the al-Aalol’s family which was used as a observation point for the soldiers. From their house you can see ours.
The witness testified, and I quoted her above, that: "there were no soldiers in the area". She also speculates that "They probably shot my daughter from the house of the al-Aalol’s family". So the witness saw no IDF in the area, she didn't see where the bullet came from so she speculates that the IDF must have shot her daughter. That's a huge leap to make considering she states she saw no IDF in the area.

Yet the title clearly states: "IDF soldiers kill eleven year-old Palestinian girl in Nablus, September 2004". So far the witness's own testimony leans greatly towards IDF soldiers, (note the plural), not shooting an eleven year-old Palestinian girl in Nablus. Therefore this link documenting that the IDF targets civilians should be approached with a high degree of scepticism. Or are you saying that the witness testimony in the link proves beyond all reasonable doubt that "IDF soldiers" shot an eleven-year-old in Nablus.

{edited to add precedence}
By SUSAN TAYLOR MARTIN, Times Senior Correspondent


Who killed 10-year-old Norhan Deeb? Was it an Israeli soldier shooting from an outpost near the girl's school in the Gaza Strip? Or was it a Palestinian firing into the air to celebrate a joyous occasion?

Israelis and Palestinians blame each other, leaving only two things certain about Norhan's recent death: She was standing in the courtyard of a U.N.-run school when a bullet hit her in the face. And she was yet another casualty of a conflict in which truth and trust have often proved as elusive as peace.

The story quoted U.N. spokesman Johan Eriksson as saying that U.N. officials couldn't definitively identify the source of the gunfire, but all signs pointed to the Israeli troops. But the circumstances grew murkier over the next few days when at least three Israeli news organizations reported a Palestinian had been arrested.

The Associated Press tried to confirm the accounts, but said in a subsequent story that "officials from all the (Palestinian) security services in Gaza denied the reports."

Yael Hartmann, a spokeswoman for the Israel Defense Forces, said the IDF never received any information that a Palestinian had been arrested. However, she added, the army is convinced Norhan's death was caused by Palestinian gunfire.

"There is no possible way it could have come from a bullet of ours," Hartmann told the Times.

The nearest Israeli outpost to the school is 900 meters away (some 2,950 feet) but the maximum range of bullets used in the soldiers' M-16 rifles is 350 meters, Hartmann said.

Hartmann said the Palestinian Authority did not respond to an IDF request to help investigate Norhan's death.

In the absence of a thorough investigation, the question of who shot Norhan Deeb likely will remain a mystery. And that might suit both sides, says Hoffman, the professor at Purdue.

"In so many minds, young kids symbolize innocence, and some little girl lining up in a schoolyard - it's a great way for Palestinians to paint Israelis as barbarians, and a great way for Israel to try to paint Palestinians as barbarians who kill their own. It's great political theater, but it's grotesque."

{end edit}

Next Link.

IDF soldiers kill Muhammad Diriyah, father of six, when he opens the door to his house for them, April 2004

Muhammad moved me away from the door with his hand and told me that he would open it. I turned around and went to get the children and my daughter-in-law. I heard one of the soldiers say in Arabic, “We’ve killed a terrorist, we’ve killed a terrorist,” but I did not hear any shooting. When I returned with Hayah and the children, we saw Muhammad lying on the ground by the entrance to the house.
In this third link the witness heard no shots, "I heard one of the soldiers say in Arabic, “We’ve killed a terrorist, we’ve killed a terrorist,” but I did not hear any shooting.". But she was only meters away from the door where Muhammad was shot. Interesting.

"On Sunday, 11 April 2004, at about 10:00 P.M., I was saying evening prayers. While I was praying, I heard about ten explosions of stun grenades and loud sounds of gunfire"
The witness heard that, she could somehow distinguish between frag grenades and stun grenades - editorializing anyone? - but somehow she did not hear Muhammad being shot a few meters away.

Additionally 99% of the time IDF soldiers do not communicate to other IDF soldiers under duress in Arabic, they communicate in Hebrew. So here are two red flags in this witness testimony that had she been in a court of law I would ask her about.

But in this third link the probability that the IDF shot Muhammad is very high. We know from the witness testimony that: "On Sunday, 11 April 2004, at about 10:00 P.M., I was saying evening prayers. While I was praying, I heard about ten explosions of stun grenades and loud sounds of gunfire", and "After about five minutes, the sound of shooting and grenades grew louder, and bullets came flying into the house".

So the IDF was involved in a firefight with unamed militants - at night - for no less than 5 minutes, yet the article does not even give that consideration. Nor does it inform the reader that Palestinian terrorists/combatants often dress like noncombatants such as the innocent victim Muhammad. We also know from the witness testimony that the firefight started in one place and ended somewhere around Muhammad's house.

Yet when the IDF finally came to Muhammad's door after a five minute firefight did they "shell" the house? Nope. Did they fire weapons blindly into the house? Nope. The witness states: "On the way, I heard the soldiers shout in Arabic, “Terrorist! Open the door!” They kept on shouting all the time, and I could not tell where they were standing". The IDF shouted for Muhammad to open the door.

Yet you, Orwell, claim these three links prove the IDF targets civilians. I say they prove otherwise.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom