Poem
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2021
- Messages
- 4,047
Which part of Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition is in any way opaque to you?You have not shown, to the best of my recollection, that the material that "would be refused classification by the BBFC and would therefore be illegal to supply or distribute offline (on DVD or Blu-Ray)" IS legal to supply or distribute on DVD or Blu-Ray in the US, and you have not shown that it is any more regulated online in the UK than it is in the US.
Max Hardcore Wikipedia:
Based on Max Extreme 4, the city of Los Angeles in 1998 charged him with child pornography and distribution of obscenity. That the actress was over the age of 18 was not disputed; charges were brought because the actress was portraying a character who was underage. Just before the case was brought to trial in 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition) that the statute prohibiting adults from portraying children in films and books was unconstitutional. Based on this ruling, the child pornography charges against Little were dismissed.