• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Should we shut the hypothetical street corner porn booth


  • Total voters
    10
You have not shown, to the best of my recollection, that the material that "would be refused classification by the BBFC and would therefore be illegal to supply or distribute offline (on DVD or Blu-Ray)" IS legal to supply or distribute on DVD or Blu-Ray in the US, and you have not shown that it is any more regulated online in the UK than it is in the US.
Which part of Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition is in any way opaque to you?

Max Hardcore Wikipedia:
Based on Max Extreme 4, the city of Los Angeles in 1998 charged him with child pornography and distribution of obscenity. That the actress was over the age of 18 was not disputed; charges were brought because the actress was portraying a character who was underage. Just before the case was brought to trial in 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition) that the statute prohibiting adults from portraying children in films and books was unconstitutional. Based on this ruling, the child pornography charges against Little were dismissed.
 
A classic rephrasing of the Slippery Slope Fallacy, crafted specifically to invoke disgust.
How so?
You won't get far with rhetorical tricks here, Poem.
Since you don't understand what the saying means then this is irrelevant.
That the US Supreme Court struck down provisions like 'appears to be' and 'conveys the impression of' is a clear case of said fish rot. Max Hardcore should have gone to prison for producing and distributing CSAM.
 
Which is why I value much more highly those documentarians who make an effort to be as neutral as possible, and take steps to mitigate their bias in the work.
If most people are consuming porn (they are), then statistically the predominant biases will be pro-porn. If the Beyond Fantasy film is also biased (it is), then that will merely be a correction (to some degree).

Chances are that a 'neutral' documentary about the porn industry will be made by porn consumers. Porn consumers won't want to lose the easy-access status quo they current enjoy (euphamism). Cleaning up internet porn would require regulation and cost lots of money. That might imperil easy access.
 
What's the euphemism for?

What's the unpleasant truth you're trying sugarcoat, with the word "enjoy"?

What are you really talking about ml
Who is ml? Enjoy means masturbate to. I didn't say it was an unpleasant truth - I was just alluding to what is actually occurring. When you align that with the roleplay content being discussed - well, it should be a wake-up call.

You continue to ignore my posts.
 
Where's the Australian court cases, finding such content illegal?
Not Australia, but the UK - the BBFC:
“Parity on and offline is paramount and our research suggests that there is broad support among pornography users in the UK for aligning the regulation of online pornography with the standards already applied offline. What’s illegal to distribute offline, should be illegal to distribute online.

Darat has posted that roleplay porn is prosecuted in the UK but, as this clearly states, it's not happening online.
 
Last edited:
Where's the Australian court cases, finding such content illegal?
Again, not Australia but the UK:
Can you cite any cases where anyone in the UK has been prosecuted?

I found a case where parents where judged to have sexually abused their own daughter by showing her porn.
You are joking?




Go to any news site that covers the UK and you will find hundreds of such reports.
I pushed back on Darat's claim as it does not explicitly say roleplay porn was found - but the law is clear - it is illegal.
 
The saying 'Fish rot from the head down' is not about slippery slopes.
Yes it is. It's saying that the rot starts at the head, but it spreads through the whole fish. The analogy is that the damage to society starts at CSAM, but it spreads to encompass all forms of pornography. It's textbook slippery slope.
 
Yes it is. It's saying that the rot starts at the head, but it spreads through the whole fish. The analogy is that the damage to society starts at CSAM, but it spreads to encompass all forms of pornography. It's textbook slippery slope.
I could nave been clearer.

The head (the Supreme Court in the US) went rotten (argued that provisions under the CPPA were overbroad) with the result that child roleplay porn became legal. One moment it was child pornography then the next it wasn't (viz. Max Hardcore).
 
Interesting that there is a strong Christian influence in the current US administration with such figures as J.D. Vance, Pete Hegseth, Pam Bondi, Russell Vought and Paula White-Cain. Also, there is:

The White House Faith Office:
A West Wing entity focused on religious outreach and policy implementation, heavily staffed by evangelical and conservative Christian leaders.
The Religious Liberty Commission: Established to review federal rules and advance protections heavily advocated by traditionalist Christian organizations.
Agency Faith Liaisons:
Centers for faith have been established across federal departments to coordinate policy related to religious freedom and expression.

All this apparent Christian spirituality presiding over a libertarian porn industry that glamorises what looks like child sex abuse. Pretty astonishing.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom