Does procreation offer proof;

[Bishadi]

Assuming that what you mean by "a point of nothing" in relation to the big bang theory is the hot dense state of the universe that the big bang starts with then:

• Hubbles law.
• The alpha-Lyman forest.
• and all of the other evidence that you are either ignorant of or are ignoring.

Bishadi, try learning about something before dismissing it out of hand.

show your argument

otherwise you are just through names like 'well genesis said" and i already know a red shift is not speed based but the mass/energy in-between the exchanges (of light) is affecting the wavelengths. kind of like putting a prism in the sun.

 

[nescafe]

i already know a red shift is not speed based but the mass/energy in-between the exchanges (of light) is affecting the wavelengths. kind of like putting a prism in the sun.

That is hilariously wrong.

 

[Bishadi]

Present your evidence that the CBR is not evidence for the big bang.

ever have an old TV with antena?

is that background radiation?

from a big bang or just throughout the atmosphere.

get real dood...................

Just spouting unsupported assertions makes you look like a dumb troll. I am sure that you are not one and so can cite the papers or textbooks containing this evidence.

shut up


what you are trying to do is like telling an atheist, 'well prove god didn't create the universe'


its a stupid method

 

[Bishadi]

That is hilariously wrong.

i affected mass, all spooky like!


cool

 

[John Jones]

show your argument

otherwise you are just through names like 'well genesis said" and i already know a red shift is not speed based but the mass/energy in-between the exchanges (of light) is affecting the wavelengths. kind of like putting a prism in the sun.

It's about time for you to start showing your own arguments.

Start with teh Al-Gebra

 

[Fiona]

So this is a variation of "science is another religion": sorry, I was a bit slow on the uptake there. Why are people arguing with a self confessed troll anyway?

 

[John Jones]

ever have an old TV with antena?

is that background radiation?

from a big bang or just throughout the atmosphere.

get real dood...................




shut up


what you are trying to do is like telling an atheist, 'well prove god didn't create the universe'


its a stupid method

Is that's what goes on in your clouded mind?

 

[Bishadi]

Nope. How the heck would a galaxy resonate in the microwave part of the spectrum anyways?

kind of like the conversion of the 2.45GHz of the microwave magnetron to the rest of the food

It does not change as the Sun's magnetic field does.

see above

Ditto.

It is not heat at all, it is redshifted short-wave IR (with a little bit of the visible spectrum). If the CMB had not been redshifted, we might even be able to see part of it directly.

funny stuff

these guys rant 'equlibrate' and yet the BB cbr has not equlibrated in 13 billin years.....

just a crack up

 

[nescafe]

It's about time for you to start showing your own arguments.

Start with teh Al-Gebra

Isn't that some sort of terrorist organization perpetrated by middle school math teachers?

 

[Bishadi]

Is that's what goes on in your clouded mind?

not really buit the trolls cant read or stay focused on the OP.

So i could do the old... trick of claiming "the sky aint blue but is black with lil'white dots"

and the trolls would have no idea i am right about half the time

 

[Dinwar]

these guys rant 'equlibrate' and yet the BB cbr has not equlibrated in 13 billin years.....

This is like saying "These guys rant 'equilibrate' and yet my dinner is still hot 10 minutes after taking it out of the oven...."

 

[nescafe]

kind of like the conversion of the 2.45GHz of the microwave magnetron to the rest of the food

Silly analogies will not save you. Show your math, or at least a vaguely plausible hypothesis written in comprehensible English.

 

[majamin]

Correct my if I'm wrong, Bishadi, your hypothesis is:

Sex (procreation) causes the life of a mass to decrease in entropy, breaking the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

Is this accurate? We've seen bits and pieces of your ideas throughout this thread, just wanted to summarize what your hypothesis could be if you summed it up in one sentence.

 

[Bishadi]

Isn't that some sort of terrorist organization perpetrated by middle school math teachers?

the math is easy it is the adherance to laws that self defeat each other that shows who is complacent and who is not willing to accept, just not knowing, by choice.

i was in third grade doing parabolics using the quadradic equation.

how about you?

 

[Bishadi]

Correct my if I'm wrong, Bishadi, your hypothesis is:

Sex (procreation) causes the life of a mass to decrease in entropy, breaking the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

i dont follow the pirates code.

i offered a venue for any to see the law is abused by life. Hence the law is to be repealed for any to comprehend the causal reason as to what life is.

Is this accurate? We've seen bits and pieces of your ideas throughout this thread, just wanted to summarize what your hypothesis could be if you summed it up in one sentence.

first post, asked does 'life; abuses entropy"

and offered evidence. seems aftern a few spend to the time honestly assess the evidence, it is 'stupid easy' to comprehend

 

[nescafe]

these guys rant 'equlibrate' and yet the BB cbr has not equlibrated in 13 billin years.....

Yeah, it is only ~1.4*10^10 years since the Big Bang. Assuming the Universe continues to expand, things won't really start slowing down until about 1.1*10^14 years from now when the last red dwarfs burn out.

 

[phunk]

show your argument

otherwise you are just through names like 'well genesis said" and i already know a red shift is not speed based but the mass/energy in-between the exchanges (of light) is affecting the wavelengths. kind of like putting a prism in the sun.

I'll have to remember that next time a cop tries to give me a speeding ticket!

 

[Reality Check]

So this is a variation of "science is another religion": sorry, I was a bit slow on the uptake there. Why are people arguing with a self confessed troll anyway?

Maybe because it is fun to make fun of him/her/them/it ?

Personally I am not really answering Bishadi. Given that Bishadi is a troll with the usual adolesent ignorance of science there is no point.
However there may be lurkers that think that Bishadi is serious or has any knowledge of science hidden within his gibberish. It is them that my answers are addressed to.

 

[majamin]

i dont follow the pirates code.

i offered a venue for any to see the law is abused by life. Hence the law is to be repealed for any to comprehend the causal reason as to what life is.

first post, asked does 'life; abuses entropy"

and offered evidence. seems aftern a few spend to the time honestly assess the evidence, it is 'stupid easy' to comprehend

I guess that's a no. Well, let's take the sentence, "abuses entropy". "Abuses" is a word used in the English language to describe the action of taking deliberate advantage of another thing in order to cause harm (usually a person to another person). So in this context, it's not clear what you mean, since entropy is not capable of being "harmed".

Is it possible that you mean "life decreases entropy"? Or perhaps, "life stabilizes entropy"? Please clarify.

 

[Bishadi]

Yeah, it is only ~1.4*10^10 years since the Big Bang. Assuming the Universe continues to expand, things won't really start slowing down until about 1.1*10^14 years from now when the last red dwarfs burn out.

now that is bonafide gobbly-goop

not a lick of evidence other than folks looking at a 'lil'white' dot and trying to suggest that mass is crunching on itself.

just speculation and you bought it

how about trying to focus on the thread?