Does procreation offer proof;

[laca]

So with all the rules and education to be had may i assume, each of you are losers to your environment?


Are you alive?

ie.... do we identify you as a reduction to any system?

Are you capable of putting on a coat when you are cold?

I was interested to know what is the life of your mass? Are you of the intent of just being a waste of time?


To any physicist, perhaps try identifying the life of the mass as the subject within the environment and let me know how it comes out?

The good ones will know what this thread means!

Yrreg has a sibling! Procreation did abuse entropy! He's right! Run! Run for your lives!

 

[majamin]

The 'life' of mass is the specimen and that concept is as easy as comprehending the flame of a fire. (ie... the flame is not the intake and results but the process in action)

My eyes bled when I read this, but I laughed hysterically nonetheless.

 

[Foster Zygote]

So with all the rules and education to be had may i assume, each of you are losers to your environment?

Eventually, yes. In the end, most of the order that my existence has generated will break down.

Are you alive?

Most definitely.

ie.... do we identify you as a reduction to any system?

Are you capable of putting on a coat when you are cold?

Do you think that putting on a coat is a violation of the laws of thermodynamics?

I was interested to know what is the life of your mass?

I'm sorry, but that makes no sense. Are you relying on some sort of translation software?

Are you of the intent of just being a waste of time?

More insults, eh?

To any physicist, perhaps try identifying the life of the mass as the subject within the environment and let me know how it comes out?

Again, this makes no sense.

The good ones will know what this thread means!

Who are "the good ones"? Perhaps they can explain what you're on about in a cogent fashion.

 

[drkitten]

Who are "the good ones"? Perhaps they can explain what you're on about in a cogent fashion.

No one's that good.

 

[Salerio]

Does procreation offer proof that; "life abuses entropy"?


Meaning if a living thing divides itself (give a cell (sperm/egg for example) to live into the next generation, is that life avoiding simple equlibration?


IS the life of that mass (the energy) furthering?

The analogy in question is; if all of the life of mankind began as a single celled critter some time back and has lived, divided and evolved over time, has that life ever equlibrated as an entity 'life itself'?

Does this make sense?

And if not, please explain.

Word salad.

No

Don't understand

 

[Olowkow]

Does procreation offer proof that; "life abuses entropy"?

I believe he probably means:

Does procreation offer proof that life violates entropy?

 

[Fiona]

*appoints Olowkow official interpreter*: it is a full time job and the pay is crap: but there is nothing like a volunteer with enthusiasm

 

[MattusMaximus]

Oh my FSM... another Bishadi thread

Bishadi, have you yet learned the importance of dealing with closed vs. open systems regarding such questions as entropy & thermodynamics?

 

[Normal Dude]

Is that where you are now?

i mean, you are on this forum and i will bet you have no idea that you are alive and to this day, have no idea what you are.

The 'life' of mass is the specimen and that concept is as easy as comprehending the flame of a fire. (ie... the flame is not the intake and results but the process in action)

None of that made ANY sense whatsoever. I'm quickly becoming convinced you are some sort of computer program throwing word salad on forums.

 

[Bishadi]

Oh my FSM... another Bishadi thread

Bishadi, have you yet learned the importance of dealing with closed vs. open systems regarding such questions as entropy & thermodynamics?

sure, not closed system within the universe. Proof; no absolute vacuum anywhere between points of mass within the whole universe.

When you can prove a perfect vacuum, then you have an argument, otherwise, shut up!

 

[Bishadi]

I believe he probably means:

Does procreation offer proof that life violates entropy?

I used the word 'abuses' which is ongoing.

life; abuses entropy (ie... life, intends to live (see instinct))

no ambiguity about it

 

[PixyMisa]

So with all the rules and education to be had may i assume, each of you are losers to your environment?

Ultimately, yes.

Are you alive?

Hang on, let me check.

...

Yep, mostly.

ie.... do we identify you as a reduction to any system?

Yes, certainly. We eat, we breathe.

Are you capable of putting on a coat when you are cold?

No, I don't have a coat.

I was interested to know what is the life of your mass?

The mass hangs around, but I probably won't.

Are you of the intent of just being a waste of time?

No. Why, are you?

To any physicist, perhaps try identifying the life of the mass as the subject within the environment and let me know how it comes out?

Why?

 

[Bishadi]

Do you think that putting on a coat is a violation of the laws of thermodynamics?

Most definitely.

Who are "the good ones"? Perhaps they can explain what you're on about in a cogent fashion.

minds that evolve do better in life

the life that does not evolve, goes extinct over time

 

[Normal Dude]

Most definitely.

Dare I ask what startling genius will be involved in the reason behind that answer?

 

[Bishadi]

Dare I ask what startling genius will be involved in the reason behind that answer?

the coat will keep you from getting cold and it aint no accident, when you put it on. (you would be 'breaking the law')

 

[PixyMisa]

the coat will keep you from getting cold and it aint no accident, when you put it on. (you would be 'breaking the law')

Be precise.

Which of the laws of thermodynamics would be broken and how?

 

[Doubt]

sure, not closed system within the universe. Proof; no absolute vacuum anywhere between points of mass within the whole universe.

Vacuums are not required for closed system. So you have learned nothing.

Example of a closed system would be a transistor radio powered by a battery.

Your quote above is about as sensible as the following:

I like eggs. Proof: Ducks can fly.

 

[Olowkow]

I used the word 'abuses' which is ongoing.

life; abuses entropy (ie... life, intends to live (see instinct))

no ambiguity about it

Oh, I see, it's all in the semicolon which gives entropy its additional subtleties, and revises the meaning of "abuse", while framboising the octality of the fleenerstand. Silly me.

 

[Normal Dude]

the coat will keep you from getting cold and it aint no accident, when you put it on. (you would be 'breaking the law')

Once again, that made zero sense. I feel like I'm conversing with someone who has Wernicke's aphasia. Spell it out for us non-geniuses: what law is it breaking, and how? Because I can't think of a way that would break any laws of thermodynamics without first giving myself a lobotomy.

 

[Ziggurat]

Does procreation offer proof that; "life abuses entropy"?

Nope.

Meaning if a living thing divides itself (give a cell (sperm/egg for example) to live into the next generation, is that life avoiding simple equlibration?

Earth is not in thermal equilibrium. It is situated between something very hot and very cold. As long as that very hot thing (more commonly known as "the sun") stays hot, and that very cold thing (more commonly known as "deep space") stays cold, the earth will continue to exist out of equilibrium. Nothing about that statement suggests any violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Same with life: it's not an equilibrium condition, but that doesn't matter, because it only exists in an environment that is not in equilibrium.