• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does "I" Exist? Or, Just a Concept?

LostAngeles said:
Please, go back and very carefully read my last few posts. Make note of my use of pronouns. Then read the post you replied to very carefully and think long and hard about it.
Click to expand...


Asking Iacchus to think as the same as asking a donkey to be a horse.
 
Here's a hint Iaccus. It is not an insult to question a woman's manliness. Reflect on that
 
Loon said:
Here's a hint Iaccus. It is not an insult to question a woman's manliness. Reflect on that
Click to expand...

You know he's just going to repond with something about how impossible it is to reflect on nothing because nothing is all we are*. We are merely figments of Iacchus's incredibly large, powerful, and oh so manly brain.





*And the aproximate level of my manliness +/- beer and football.
 
I've never 'laid with a woman'. Does that forestall my ability to prove anything? (I've laid with quite a few men in my time - sorry if that conjures any disgusting images...)

See, there is nothing to 'puhruuve' on my part. Most of the 'puhruuving' must be relegated to your part. And 'puhruuving' usually involves learning and investigating, even at the expense of your most treasured ideas.

Note that I use 'puhruuve' since 'proof' is for mathematical and logical systems. For anything else, best to use evidence. Although philosophical discussions skirt the boundaries, I will only accept evidence since logical arguments tend to work well only within the stratum of logical systems. Your OP question is one that requires evidence not argumentative proof. This is where we part paths - since you believe that you can logically (albeit not very convincingly) argue your way to a position rather than support it with evidence.

Did you happen to view any of those videos?
 
LostAngeles said:
You know he's just going to repond with something about how impossible it is to reflect on nothing because nothing is all we are*. We are merely figments of Iacchus's incredibly large, powerful, and oh so manly brain.
Click to expand...
Actually, I'm much more like a cherub, or an imp ... or, even eros.
 
Wonderful. Get something more than mixed mythology by an unkonwn author and we'll give you some ground.

There's gotta be a better site than that...
 
So, this is what started it all, huh? ...

Iacchus said:
Hey, that would be something if both she and Orloff could get together wouldn't it?
Click to expand...
ImaginalDisc said:
That would be like watching matter and anti-matter come together.
Click to expand...
Iacchus said:
Or, maybe they could reconcile their differences, seeing as how they're both women?
Click to expand...
You folks just couldn't wait now could you? Anyway, I wonder what it really would be like if these two did get together?
 
Yes, it is. You made a stupid comment that it would all work out due to Magical Vaginal Blood Power.

Then we smacked you for it.

Then you dug past the ancient civilizations deep withing our hollow Earth and we asked, "Why?" Yet, you continue to dig.
 
Loon said:
Wonderful. Get something more than mixed mythology by an unkonwn author and we'll give you some ground.

There's gotta be a better site than that...
Click to expand...
Well, I admit that it's not the greatest site but, it is "my site." Really, I thought you were supposed to be more observant than this? ;)
 
See, the first two comments are normal discussion. Then you add the bit about "because they're women." Note that the women part has nothing to do with it. Instead of a mildy hopeful (if a bit naive) sentiment, you instead broadcast "I am Iacchus, a naff and a nitwit. I'll now post drivel so you can insult me!"

Much better just to leave the bit about "seeing as how they're both women" out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom