• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Does CERN prove Einstein wrong?

But has many different spots on the moon been tested with a laser from Earth? I predict that more such reflective spots will be found. And the spots will not appear darkened in the sunlight. The spots, such as highly reflective patches on moon rocks, will appear bright on photographs. The spots will be small and only show up on very zoomed in photographs of the moon surface. I haven't seen any such closeup photographs (not counting the Apollo studio shots ;)).

So...the spots are very small, and only shiny at laser frequencies. All of them, Anders? You are aware that several different frequencies of laser have been bounced off the LRRR, right? Or perhaps this magical substance only shows its remarkable properties to phase-coherent light!

Hey, here's an idea. Since as you say a simple bit of applied QED can calculate if ordinary substances are capable of this behavior, let's go looking for one! I'm sure there are a lot of people who could use such a selective reflector.

Just off the top of my head, chroma-key could benefit from it -- imagine being able to selectively reflect just the LED back to camera without any ordinary light at all reflecting off the backdrop! I can imagine security applications as well. And given a moment or two, I could come up with places where they could be used in fabrication and medical use of lasers...
 
[crap-stirring]
I guess now would be a bad time to mention the intrinsically retroreflective qualities of lunar regolith, caused by microspheres of volcanic glass?
[/crap-stirring]

Too late -- I did a few pages back. Not that Anders noticed at the time.
 
I'm not sure Anders grasps the difference between specular and diffuse reflection yet. His magic spots are not just 10x the albedo. They are also directional, and very precisely so (oh, and retroreflective as well...!)
 
Oh, man. Retroreflective is now one of my new favorite words!

Unfortunately it's fairly off topic. I wonder what happened to the relativity discussion. :D Why has no experiment been done to test the speed of light from a moving source relative to an observer?
 
It's not entirely off topic. It's related to the international banksters and their military fronts.

Exqueeze me?

The topic is "Does CERN prove Einstien wrong?" and you introduce "international bankers and their military fronts"? And at post 1410 no less.

How is that not seriously off topic?
 
No it isn't.

Are you willing to concede that you have no rational support for your theory that there are no LRRRs on the Moon?

100 times less reflected light than expected. That's rational support for my theory. Unless you want to believe that dust heating up a mirror is the cause. What a fairy tale. Ha ha.
 
Exqueeze me?

The topic is "Does CERN prove Einstien wrong?" and you introduce "international bankers and their military fronts"? And at post 1410 no less.

How is that not seriously off topic?

That was explained in the first (or second) post in this thread before it was merged. Now I don't have a clue where that first post is.
 

Back
Top Bottom