Does anyone else back up William Rodriguez's story?

You should have seen the time on SLC when I challenged him to contact engineers. I ended up having to Google "engineering firms" for him. The very first hit was filled with the very contact info that Swing couldn't be bothered finding himself. Even if 911 was an inside job the perps would have little to fear with such lazy researchers on their trail.

I see your heading down the path the Admin's here warned you about. Classic.

What do I think happened?
I think terrorists used an explosive device in the sublevel garage area along with the impact of the planes. Until it is scientifically proven or empirical evidence is presented that a fireball or jetfuel from the impact area caused the extent of damage witnessed and experienced, the ED in the basement theory remains plausible. More so than the fireball theory according to the damage to the environment, the overpressure necessary to destroy a garage, a machine shop, cause a cave in at B-4, and a cave in at the PATH plaza all of which are inconsistent with the fireball.

The fireball excuse depends on two miracles taking place. The survival of the Griffiths.

I notice here for the most part, people want to argue burn damage but somehow avoid the environment damage. Is that because the enivronment damage is not consistent with a fireball and hence the offical story?
 
Last edited:
In the Spirit of Cooperation...

has anyone found supporting evidence to the 9 unprepared firefigthers that left Ed Mcabe alone in the dak in the basement of WTC: North Tower?
 
I think terrorists used an explosive device in the sublevel garage area along with the impact of the planes.

You're still refusing to name who you think these terrorists are. Al Qaeda? US government demolition squads? IRA? Tamil Tigers? Chechens? Do tell.

I think the answer to that lies in the fact that this "basement bomb" of yours was apparently set off at about the same time as the jet impacted. What was the point of such timing? Why would a terrorist group try so hard to cover up part of their attack? Right, they wouldn't.

The only people who would care whether or not this bomb blast was uncovered would be the government. Yet you refuse to name them.

The fireball excuse depends on two miracles taking place. The survival of the Griffiths.

And I'm sure you're doing everything you can to contact them.

I notice here for the most part, people want to argue burn damage but somehow avoid the environment damage. Is that because the enivronment damage is not consistent with a fireball and hence the offical story?

Do you have any idea what kind of damage was done by the 1993 bomb? Do you think people walked away from the blast area with fuel burns?
 
You're still refusing to name who you think these terrorists are. Al Qaeda? US government demolition squads? IRA? Tamil Tigers? Chechens? Do tell.
I think the answer to that lies in the fact that this "basement bomb" of yours was apparently set off at about the same time as the jet impacted. What was the point of such timing? Why would a terrorist group try so hard to cover up part of their attack? Right, they wouldn't.
The only people who would care whether or not this bomb blast was uncovered would be the government. Yet you refuse to name them.
And I'm sure you're doing everything you can to contact them.
Do you have any idea what kind of damage was done by the 1993 bomb? Do you think people walked away from the blast area with fuel burns?

I've already listed one suspect or did you miss that part ?
Right, they wouldn't.
So you can speak for terrorists now? As I said earlier, I think the timing was to put a dual attack on the structure as close the impacts as possible. A 1-2 punch so to speak for the various reasons listed below.
What do you mean by "cover up" that part of their attack?

Also, which elevator shaft from the picture below do you think was responsible for the lobby destruction?
 

Attachments

  • Elevator cross section.jpg
    Elevator cross section.jpg
    53.2 KB · Views: 6
I searched using jetfuelA and vaporization.
Does kerosene have the exact chemical composition as jetfuel A?

Immediately after I take you to task for being too lazy to do any research, you ask me to do your homework for you.

Jet-A Fuel/Kerosene MSDS
This material will release flammable vapors
which if exposed to an ignition source can burn in the open or be
explosive in confined spaces. Mists or sprays may be flammable at
temperatures below the normal flash point.
So long, Swing. Please learn to be an adult and not waste people's time.

Edit: now I see that you're too lazy to refer to the elevator shaft diagrams and eyewitness descriptions of express elevators causing lobby damage, which I took the time to provide in my Rodriguez paper. Instead you use a crude illustration that shows no detail.

You are some piece of work.

Grow up and stop wasting people's time.
 
Last edited:
You should have seen the time on SLC when I challenged him to contact engineers.

I ended up having to Google "engineering firms" for him. The very first hit was filled with the very contact info that Swing couldn't be bothered finding himself.

Even if 911 was an inside job the perps would have little to fear with such lazy researchers on their trail.
So true.

"The fate of the free world rests on the information that I KNOW is out there! Maybe tomorrow I'll start looking for it."
 
I've already listed one suspect or did you miss that part ?

No I saw it. I was waiting for you to explain who Sakher 'Rocky' Hammadly is and who he works for.

I think the timing was to put a dual attack on the structure as close the impacts as possible.

Why??? Why set off the bomb as close to the impacts as possible? Why not 5 minutes prior? Or 10 minutes later? Why the need to be so exact?

Also, which elevator shaft from the picture below do you think was responsible for the lobby destruction?

Oh boy, now you're even denying that the lobby was damaged by a blast from the jet fuel.

I wonder who set off the lobby bomb after the B-25 hit the Empire State Building back in the late 1940s. Any theories, Swing?
 
Immediately after I take you to task for being too lazy to do any research, you ask me to do your homework for you.
Jet-A Fuel/Kerosene MSDS
So long, Swing. Please learn to be an adult and not waste people's time.
A simple yes or no would have sufficed. And I didnt' ask you to do research, I wanted to know what kind of answer I would get back from readers. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

Oh and one chemical difference between the two are that additivies are placed into straight run kerosene to create jetfuel A to increase its freezing point. This of course changes the chemical makeup. So the simple answer of no would have sufficed. But instead you did what the moderators of the forum have asked you not to do.

This material will release flammable vapors
which if exposed to an ignition source can burn in the open or be
explosive in confined spaces. Mists or sprays may be flammable at
temperatures below the normal flash point.
And the white colored vapor from jetfuel A is to be found where?

Thanks again for avoiding all of my other questions and comments to you, I appreciate the bow out.

Oh and let me know if you want me to point out the other errors in your paper!
 
Although I'm not sure of the location, we know that bomb sniffing dogs were abruptly removed from
the complex. NewYork Newsday

This abrutp removal of bomb sniffing dogs began the day after Rocky has his visitor/work pass to work on sprinklers.

There is no corroborating evidence that bomb-sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC in the days before 9/11. The "September 6" story, was reported only that one time in New York Newsday on 9/12/01. From the story:

"Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed."


The Port Authority Police Department was in charge of security at the WTC, not some "guards". This story was never reported by any other media outlet and Daria Coard never made another statement about it. Who is she? Who was her employer?

PAPD Officer David Lim testified to the 9/11 Commission that he and bomb sniffing dog Sirius (killed in the attack) were on duty the morning of 9/11:

"On that fateful day, my job was checking vehicles that were entering the WTC Truck Dock for possible explosives. At about 0830hrs, I was in my office/kennel on the B-1 level #2WTC. About 15 minutes later, I felt the bldg shake. I left Sirius in his kennel & responded to the mezzanine of #1 WTC to assist people coming out of the "A" stairwell."

As for Sakher 'Rocky' Hammad he had a visitor's pass, not a work authorization. No work order from any plumbing company or WTC tenant has every been produced, no one witnesses him in the WTC basement and I've yet to see a first person quote from HIM stating he was working at the WTC.

If your contention is that he was wandering around there to possibly plant a bomb, there is absolutely no evidence for that.


 
Oh and one chemical difference between the two are that additivies are placed into straight run kerosene to create jetfuel A to increase its freezing point. This of course changes the chemical makeup. So the simple answer of no would have sufficed. But instead you did what the moderators of the forum have asked you not to do.

And the white colored vapor from jetfuel A is to be found where?

Thanks again for avoiding all of my other questions and comments to you, I appreciate the bow out.

Oh and let me know if you want me to point out the other errors in your paper!

You can not find correct answers, how will you find errors.

Jet fuel dumped in the air is white like a cloud. In the dark it is black. Questions?

Why are you having problems with this? Even pdoh could find the a photo of http://www.habu.org/a-12/06924.html
 
Last edited:
When jet fuel is white like a cloud. In the dark it is black. Questions?
beachnut used to have the new E-1's check if there was fuel in the tank by using a match as a light. Oh, those hilarious days when hazing was legal!
 
A simple yes or no would have sufficed. And I didnt' ask you to do research, I wanted to know what kind of answer I would get back from readers. A simple yes or no would have sufficed.

Oh and one chemical difference between the two are that additivies are placed into straight run kerosene to create jetfuel A to increase its freezing point. This of course changes the chemical makeup. So the simple answer of no would have sufficed. But instead you did what the moderators of the forum have asked you not to do.


And the white colored vapor from jetfuel A is to be found where?

Thanks again for avoiding all of my other questions and comments to you, I appreciate the bow out.

Oh and let me know if you want me to point out the other errors in your paper!


Uh, Swingie, this is the JREF. We kind of noticed that you haven't pointed out any errors in Mark's paper.

Tell us again why not a single demolition expert anywhere in the world swallows the fantasist snake oil about explosives in the Twin Towers.
 
With no mention of damaged walls, windows blown out, burns to the people, etc..you know damage matching what was seen in the lobby and in the basement.



According to the firemen who were in the lobby of WTC1 the smashed windows and falling marble wall panels were as a result of the building moving (which is how they knew it might collapse), not a result of the fireball.

-Gumboot
 
You can not find correct answers, how will you find errors. Jet fuel dumped in the air is white like a cloud. In the dark it is black. Questions? Why are you having problems with this? Even pdoh could find the a photo of http://www.habu.org/a-12/06924.html

I have no doubt that the fuel (LIQUID) is white. The issue was jet vapor (GAS). No need to confuse the two.


GUMAccording to the firemen who were in the lobby of WTC1 the smashed windows and falling marble wall panels were as a result of the building moving (which is how they knew it might collapse), not a result of the fireball.
Source?

POM-We kind of noticed that you haven't pointed out any errors in Mark's paper.
1.
Johannemann video:-What happened was we were down in the basement and all of the sudden we heard a loud bang. And the elevator doors blew open and some guy was burnt up. So I dragged him out his skin was all hangin’ off. So I dragged him out and pulled him out of the parking lot (inaudible).
In Gravy’s transcript, it reads so I dragged him out and pulled him in to the parking lot.
This is an error in the account. We are unaware of what elevator or lift Kenny is near nor does he mention a fireball exiting the lift after the lift door exploded open.
[/B] This one error changes the entire location of
2. B1 level-Ivan Almendarez. In Gravy's source, Ivan does not mention where he is located in relation to the event.

3.B1-B2 levels-From Gravy's Paper:
"I felt the explosion and the elevator dropped," Arturo said at St. Vincents Hospital in Manhattan, where he's being treated for a broken leg. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20010916/ai_n14537022
Arturo Grffith, elevator operator, in freight car 50A with carpenter Marlene Cruz:
Arturo Griffith, a Panamanian, was in a lift at the time of the impact. The whole car shook and juddered as he heard an ominous noise from above. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_20010918/ai_n14406873
Actual quote from source mentions no presence of Marlene Cruz in the elevator!
The only suggestion they were in the same elevator comes from this account from Mike Pecoraro:
One was a female Carpenter and the other an Elevator Operator. They were both badly burned and injured.
Mike either saw two different people, or he is mistaken in their injuries. Niether Marlene or Arturo were badly burned.

4.In Gray's paper: 'I don't know who saved me. It was so black and smoky. I couldn't see nothin',' Arturo said. 'When they got me out, I told them there was someone else down there, a woman. They went back to get her. Seconds after they pulled her out, a ball of fire came down the shaft. They almost got killed. http://911digitalarchive.org/seiu/details/55
The source and link has nothing to do with this account.

5. The only reference to any fireball in Arturo's account, is unsourced. http://911digitalarchive.org/seiu/details/54 There is no source at this location for Arturo's account and no other source on Arturo mentions his experience with a fireball.

6. Outright unknown locations are placed in the basemnet section alone. Although technically not an error, it is misleading to the reader.

Those 5 errors above were from the basement level alone. I have yet to critique the rest of the paper.

POM-Tell us again why not a single demolition expert anywhere in the world swallows the fantasist snake oil about explosives in the Twin Towers.
Most likely because they were TOLD jet fuel caused the massive damage in the basement. See if you read the account, most thought it was a bomb or reminded them of the 1993 attacks. Only when they were TOLD what happened is when they suggest jet fuel.
Also, which elevator shaft from the picture below do you think was responsible for the lobby destruction?
You do realise that's not an accurate reflection of the actual elevator system, right?
Feel free to provide a better one and then answer the question.

The Port Authority Police Department was in charge of security at the WTC, not some "guards". This story was never reported by any other media outlet and Daria Coard never made another statement about it. Who is she? Who was her employer?

PAPD Officer David Lim testified to the 9/11 Commission that he and bomb sniffing dog Sirius (killed in the attack) were on duty the morning of 9/11:

"On that fateful day, my job was checking vehicles that were entering the WTC Truck Dock for possible explosives. At about 0830hrs, I was in my office/kennel on the B-1 level #2WTC. About 15 minutes later, I felt the bldg shake. I left Sirius in his kennel & responded to the mezzanine of #1 WTC to assist people coming out of the "A" stairwell."
Is this the only location that a vehicle can enter the sub-levels?

As for Sakher 'Rocky' Hammad he had a visitor's pass, not a work authorization. No work order from any plumbing company or WTC tenant has every been produced, no one witnesses him in the WTC basement and I've yet to see a first person quote from HIM stating he was working at the WTC.
Source on visitor's pass? According to Federal Authorities, Rocky told them he was working on the sprinkler system. Do you expect a work order to survive the damage and destruction ?\
But Hicks said the Port Authority, which owned the building, did its own sprinkler work, and that any other work involving sprinklers would have been arranged by an individual tenant."We don't know (which one) because all our records were destroyed in the World Trade


If your contention is that he was wandering around there to possibly plant a bomb, there is absolutely no evidence for that.



So far here is what I've learned from JREF regulars please ignore this if this doesn't apply to you:
1. They will ingore and avoid facts that do not support the official story.
2. They will ingore assumptions made by NIST about the official story assuming that because they are experts, they must be right.
3. They support a paper that has numerous errors and misleading statements in it.
4. They believe that jet fuel dumped in the sky is in vapor form, not liquid.
5. They refuse to accept that kerosene, althought a primary ingriedient in jetfuel A ,does not have the same chemical properties as Jetfuel A.
6. They clutch upon the damage to humans in the subbasement all the while ignoring the damage to the environment in support of a fireball causing the damage witnessed.
7. The "leader" cries errors in my work, but refuses or cannot point out those errors.
8. And finally they do research for other readers without them asking and then break the requests of moderators by resorting to adhom attacks.
9. They rely on miracles to support the official theory that a fireball created the damage in the basement.

CHF, is this the shredding of my research that you expected? Because, frankly, I'm not impressed.
 
Liquid kerosene is clear

I have no doubt that the fuel (LIQUID) is white. The issue was jet vapor (GAS). No need to confuse the two.
Kerosene is a thin clear liquid formed from hydrocarbons
keroseneWP
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Boiling point: 150-300°C
Melting point: -20°C
Relative density (water = 1): 0.8
Solubility in water: none
Relative vapour density (air = 1): 4.5
Flash point: 37-65°C
Auto-ignition temperature: 220°C
Explosive limits, vol% in air: 0.7-5
http://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics0663.htm
Physical Form: Liquid
Appearance: Clear, light yellow, light green or dyed red
http://www.napavalleypetroleum.com/msds_napa_kerosene.htm
 

Back
Top Bottom