Docker's OKC Bombing Conspiracy Thread

Docker said:
I'll take that as a no. ;)
Click to expand...

I guess nobody in here is familiar with this theorie or interested to talk about it - unless you have evidence it´s connected to the NWO. We have a lot of fun and laughs about the NWO. :D

ETA: Oops :boggled:
 
Docker said:
So none of you can refute my evidence on OKC? Ok, as long as we know.
Click to expand...
Ehr, no, you can't conclude that. There is actually a name for this fallacy, its called argument by fast talking or changing the subject. Now, Gravy called you on this discussion, and he needs to study the evidence you presented, but you cannot demand that everyone else does. I, for one, never studied the Oklahoma bombing, and I have no immidiata plans to do so. That doesn't mean you can infer that I can't counter your argument, just that I have not chosen to do so.


...or where retards constantly call CTs retards?
Click to expand...
Hehehe, pretty good one. Of course you will need to show they ARE actually retards.

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
Ehr, no, you can't conclude that. There is actually a name for this fallacy, its called argument by fast talking or changing the subject. Now, Gravy called you on this discussion, and he needs to study the evidence you presented, but you cannot demand that everyone else does. I, for one, never studied the Oklahoma bombing, and I have no immidiata plans to do so. That doesn't mean you can infer that I can't counter your argument, just that I have not chosen to do so.


Hehehe, pretty good one. Of course you will need to show they ARE actually retards.

Hans
Click to expand...

So at least you admitted I have presented evidence worthy of study. Gravy claims I never has.

He has a very clever technique that man. But these people always meet their match
 
Docker said:
So at least you admitted I have presented evidence worthy of study. Gravy claims I never has.

He has a very clever technique that man. But these people always meet their match
Click to expand...

Could you sum it up since i also don´t care much about the OKC-Bombing?

Who was it? NWO?
 
Docker said:
No evidence? My sources are full of experts that agree with me. Do you have any relevent expertise? Have you consulted explosives experts or structural engineers?
Click to expand...

Yes, I have consulted explosive experts about the OKC bombing. Have you consulted explosive experts or just read their opinions on a web site? Did you double-check their credentials? Were their findings peer reviewed? By whom? Did they pass peer review? Did you send their findings to an qualified independent researcher to confirm their findings are more than speculation? Did you find an independent source who also came to the same conclusions that your experts did? Do you have any actual evidence or just speculation?

I would hope that someone as interested in justice as you seem to be would want to do all the research possible and send the findings to the proper authorities or the press. This would ensure that those responsible (in your opinion) were brought to justice. I can only guess your to busy making baseless accusations on the internet to do all the necessary research? Which is why I and probably most of the regulars here find you very boring.
 
CptColumbo said:
Yes, I have consulted explosive experts about the OKC bombing. Have you consulted explosive experts or just read their opinions on a web site? Did you double-check their credentials? Were their findings peer reviewed? By whom? Did they pass peer review? Did you send their findings to an qualified independent researcher to confirm their findings are more than speculation? Did you find an independent source who also came to the same conclusions that your experts did? Do you have any actual evidence or just speculation?

I would hope that someone as interested in justice as you seem to be would want to do all the research possible and send the findings to the proper authorities or the press. This would ensure that those responsible (in your opinion) were brought to justice. I can only guess your to busy making baseless accusations on the internet to do all the necessary research? Which is why I and probably most of the regulars here find you very boring.
Click to expand...

Which experts did you consult? What did they say about my evidence?
 
Docker said:
Which experts did you consult? What did they say about my evidence?
Click to expand...

I didn't consult them about "your" evidence specifically. Your question was "Have you consulted explosives experts or structural engineers?" It was informal phone calls to people I know from college and members of law enforcement who have expertise in the field of explosives. They were just to satisfy my own curiosity about the OKC bombing.

So is this "your" evidence that you researched on your own, or is it someone else's research that you are now claiming as your own?
 
CptColumbo said:
I didn't consult them about "your" evidence specifically. Your question was "Have you consulted explosives experts or structural engineers?" It was informal phone calls to people I know from college and members of law enforcement who have expertise in the field of explosives. They were just to satisfy my own curiosity about the OKC bombing.

So is this "your" evidence that you researched on your own, or is it someone else's research that you are now claiming as your own?
Click to expand...

Names please.

I am not an explosives expert and the have alreadt got these results so how am I qualified for original research.

So what did these informal (made up) phone calls reveal?
 
Docker said:
Names please.

I am not an explosives expert and the have alreadt got these results so how am I qualified for original research.

So what did these informal (made up) phone calls reveal?
Click to expand...

You wouldn't be accusing someone of lying now, would you?

tsk tsk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom