Docker's OKC Bombing Conspiracy Thread

Jury selection can mean the difference between guilty and not guilty.

Exactly. Because people have individual biases that the lawyers exploit. You just proved my point.

He (the nutter guy) has the same credibility as whatever defines a "nutter".

That sentence doesn't make sense. I'll skip it.

Just because someone posts something in a forum does not make it so.

How does that relate to what I said ? Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?

Docker said:
Is that the story? Training bombs LOL

Not to mention that no ATF got killed, witnesses heard multiple explosions, films showing john doe number 2 were never released.

Didn't Docker say "unexploded" or something ? Now it's "multiple explosions". Did they explode or not ? And if they didn't, why couldn't they be training devices ? And if SOME of them did, why couldn't the ones they found be training devices ?

Well why weren't these links posted at the beginning of the thread?

They don't count after page 2 ?

Substance. I realised quickly gravy had none

Hey, Gravy! I didn't know you were a ghost!
 
Exactly. Because people have individual biases that the lawyers exploit. You just proved my point.



That sentence doesn't make sense. I'll skip it.



How does that relate to what I said ? Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?

Go back and read the posts, think about what was posted and the purpose it was posted, because it's obvious you aren't as bright as you'd like to think you are.

btw... Some of you have waaaaaaaaaaay too much time on your hands as well.

Both forums proved my point so easily. Maybe the definition of a "nutter" is someone who spends so much time in a forum arguing and calling people names.
 
Are you going to answer what I said or just keep barking insults ?
Insults?

You're joking right?

Look around the forum and tell me what you see with regards to insults from the members here.

Answer what you said? Did you said a question? :confused:

Go back and read the posts. Do I have to type slower for you to understand?
 
Insults?

You're joking right?

Often, but not this time.

Look around the forum and tell me what you see with regards to insults from the members here.

I'm not interested in the other members. I'm interested in your response to my points here.

Answer what you said? Did you said a question? :confused:

No, I did not "said" a question. I made points about what you said.

For example:

Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?

Go back and read the posts. Do I have to type slower for you to understand?

Typing slower would only delay your response. I'd rather you type faster. Hopefully that won't produce more typos.
 
Often, but not this time.



I'm not interested in the other members. I'm interested in your response to my points here.



No, I did not "said" a question. I made points about what you said.

For example:

Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?



Typing slower would only delay your response. I'd rather you type faster. Hopefully that won't produce more typos.

I think you need Gravy to go read the posts and then explain it to you because it's obvious you'll never get it.:boggled:
 
No, I did not "said" a question. I made points about what you said.

For example:

Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?
btw...

Where I went to school that IS a question. And you ASK a question.


If you look at the previous posts you'll clearly see the answer to your question. Ask Gravy if you need help because he seems to be the only one that has a certain amount of brains although he occasionally falls into the trap of the forum group's faults by joining in your childish diatribe.
 
It's way over your head. :boggled:

You wouldn't know the meaning of a post even if Gravy told you.

Doesn't sound like it.

Seems like you are trying to cover up your crappy insults.
 
Wow..Another one. Calling Gravy...Please explain it to him.

Why do you continue to insult people here?

Yes I come here to read what people say, I come here see logical and well reasoned debate. I often sit on the side lines and watch.

Your remarks contribute nothing, other than to continue the childish badgering and baiting started by Docker.

Your labeling of those who have differing views to you as mindless steeple, does nothing to further you case and simply alienates you.
Docker was insulted, yes; this is because he choose to insult people’s intelligence. Drew, please stop doing this and you will not be insulted yourself. I have no desire to insult you, call you names or label you, but this is precisely what you are doing. It is offensive and does nothing but cause trouble.

Please grow up show some level of maturity and credit people with the same level of intelligence you wish to be credited with.
 
Last edited:
I think you need Gravy to go read the posts and then explain it to you because it's obvious you'll never get it.:boggled:

Oh, no, please don't let me stop you from answering my points:

Jury selection can mean the difference between guilty and not guilty.

Exactly. Because people have individual biases that the lawyers exploit. You just proved my point.

Just because someone posts something in a forum does not make it so.

How does that relate to what I said ? Are news reports wrong sometimes, yes or no ?
 
btw...

Where I went to school that IS a question. And you ASK a question.


If you look at the previous posts you'll clearly see the answer to your question. Ask Gravy if you need help because he seems to be the only one that has a certain amount of brains although he occasionally falls into the trap of the forum group's faults by joining in your childish diatribe.

A simple yes or no will suffice, Drew. I'm sure even you can manage this.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom