Sideroxylon
Featherless biped
It used to be be a very common hate word for Aborigines in Australia before we cracked down on racist speech.
Yes, it is, but so what? The campaign against Coon cheese's name is literally an indigenous one, not one that has just been drummed up by foreign stickybeaks.
Is this true? If so, how many did care? How many need to care before it becomes a problem?
I was speaking generally.
From memory, only 10%. As for when it's a problem, there's no scientific answer. The point is simply to be aware that just because we _think_ they're going to be offended, as a rule, it may not be so. So let's be careful with the crusadin'.
Crusaders to keep name, change logo after mosque killings
New Zealand’s Canterbury Crusaders announced Friday that the team will retain its name but change its logo after a review sparked by the deadly mosque shootings in its home city of Christchurch in March.
Critics said the name and branding referencing medieval wars between Christians and Muslims were inappropriate after the attacks, in which 51 Muslims died in attacks allegedly carried out by a self-declared white supremacist.
Immediately after the killings, the Super Rugby giants stopped parading chain-mailed knights on horseback as prematch entertainment at home games, and indicated the team logo of a sword-wielding crusader would be phased out.
But there was resistance among fans to changing the name of arguably the world’s most successful club rugby side, with a record tally of 10 Super Rugby titles, three of them won in the past three years.
I was speaking generally.
From memory, only 10%. As for when it's a problem, there's no scientific answer. The point is simply to be aware that just because we _think_ they're going to be offended, as a rule, it may not be so. So let's be careful with the crusadin'.
In the 1940s the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) created a campaign to eliminate negative stereotyping of Native American people in the media. Over time, the campaign began to focus on Indian names and mascots in sports.[98] The NCAI maintains that teams with mascots such as the Braves and the Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native American people, and demean their native traditions and rituals.[99] The NCAI issued a new report in 2013 summarizing opposition to Indian mascots and team names generally, and the Washington Redskins in particular.[100] In the trademark case, the TTAB placed significance on the NCAI opposition, estimating that the organization represented about 30% of the Native American population at the time the trademarks were granted, which met their criteria for a "substantial composite" of Native Americans finding the name disparaging.[101] In its amicus brief filed in the case, the NCAI states that the combined enrollment of its member tribes in 2013 was 1.2 million individuals.[102]
Many tribal councils have passed resolutions or issued statements regarding their opposition to the name of the Washington Redskins, including the Cherokee and Comanche Nations of Oklahoma, the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona,[103] the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes,[104][105] the Oneida Indian Nation (New York),[106] the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (North Dakota) and the United South and Eastern Tribes (USET).[107] In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises.[108] Other Native American groups advocating change include: the Native American Bar Association of DC,[109] the National Caucus of Native American State Legislators,[110] and the Society of American Indian Government Employees.
This is a strawman. You are making the claim that these things are only white guiltists making racist assumptions about what black people or indigenous people should be offended by as though they are not even consulted, when it turns out that in both cases: Coon cheese and the Washington Redskins, the issue was actually raised by people who believe the name is offensive to them.
Think it was actually a white Aussie comedian with Coon cheese leading it tbf.
You might want to read up a bit
Dr Stephen Hagan was born in 1959 in Cunnamulla in South West Queensland, Australia. His father, Jim Hagan, belonged to the Kullili people of the region, while his mother was from the nearby Kooma....
...In 2001, Hagan filed a complaint with the Advertising Standards Bureau after an advertisement for Coon cheese was broadcast during the Academy Awards.
If you are going to try and sound condescending, try to get your facts straight first, otherwise you will look foolish.
Australian comedian Josh Thomas wants Coon cheese to rebrand due to its historical use as a racial slur.
Thomas took to social media to lead the call, posting a photo of the cheese alongside the caption: "Hey Australia - are we still chill with this?''
Made by Warrnambool Cheese and Dairy Company, it's named after US creator Edward William Coon.
The fact it's named after its inventor doesn't bother Thomas, who argues the name is offensive and respectful.
That is fantastic, but it went no where. You know. Since it was 19 years ago and hadn't changed?....
Meanwhile few weeks ago
Jun 17 2020
I think the point is that it was commonly used by British people, and it was through them that it became used in Australia.
Huh? So what? Do you mean that because a white Australian also questioned the use that that invalidates a black Australian's 20+ plus-year campaign?
I think this will be an evidence free zone. The question being whether it came directly to Australia from the US or indirectly via the UK.
There is a good history of the term in this article.
The Use of "Coon" in Conrad: British Slang or Racist Slur? Jeremy Hawthorn The Conradian Vol. 30, No. 1 (Spring 2005), pp. 111-117
Which suggests that in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century coon was a racially derogatory term in the US and in Australia (particularly referencing indigenous Australians), but in English English meant a cunning person and was not referencing race. The racist meaning may have entered English English from Australia! or more likely the US. Certainly in my life time I was always aware of it as a US racist term, I did not know that it had been widely used in Australia, and it is not one of the many racist terms I have heard used in England but accept it may have been more frequent in the past. (Nor have I heard it used in the sense of couth or cunning.)
No
Do you mind posting some links to the 20 year continuous campaign?
Thanks
What I am saying that Aus has changed in 20 years.
It used to be a bit of a racist place and in some places still is.
The call was ignored 20 years ago and was forgotten and now some comedian lead it again and it is changing, as times have changed in Aus.
I have no doubt the Hagan dude is a good bloke though
Coon's owners, dairy products company Saputo, confirmed the change Friday after being written a letter of complaint in June by activist Stephen Hagan, who has been fighting for 20 years to have the name changed.
"I said that the cheese brand was offensive, I said that it demeans people of colour," Dr Hagan told the ABC on Friday.
"I said that it was unacceptable as a brand in 2020."
"After thorough consideration, Saputo has decided to retire the COON brand name."
Saputo is the third owner of the brand Dr Hagan had asked to change the name, during his 21-year fight.
It was the first to listen to him.
"If I didn't make a stand, we would still be eating Coon cheese in another 20 years' time," he said.
In an article published in The First Nations Telegraph in 2014, Dr Hagan said his research showed Edward Coon was an uneducated Russian immigrant who worked as a factory hand and the patent was launched in his name 10 years after the cheese was being sold.
Oh FFS!
Link
Answered! Now just admit you got it wrong and stop wasting people's time with this thread-Bobbing drivel.
Thank you
I was wrong
It was a question and you haven't answered it.
I think there is a difference. We usually don't think of a person's name as something that is their fault or something to be ashamed of (someone started a thread about how they were named after Robert E. Lee - turns out that it is pretty common - and asked if they should change it. I thought no, but it would be a dick move today if you had a kid and named it after Robert E. Lee. It would be even worse if your kid was a girl, but maybe I am just old fashioned).
With a company, they seem to have more leeway and more choice about how they present themselves.
According to this, the company was founded by Fred Walker, an Australian businessman who created Vegemite. The cheese is made by a process invented by the American Edward Coon, who apparently operated dairies but didn't sell cheese under that name. So the Australian Coon brand was not created by anybody named Coon, the name has no Australian connection, and the company has been through several changes of ownership, including getting sold by Kraft.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coon_cheese
Is Coon really the only name they can use for cheddar cheese in Australia? Or is it maybe smart for a marketer not to make consumers mad?
...Coon cheese is named after its American creator, Edward William Coon (1871–1934) of Philadelphia, who patented a method, subsequently known as the Cooning process, for fast maturation of cheese via high temperature and humidity...
Its name, which it shares with a racial slur, was defended by previous manufacturers Kraft and Dairy Farmers despite campaigns to change it.