rikzilla said:
Geoff,
Do me a favor and take pics....I trust you to be objective. Act skeptical and let me know how much overt communist influence you see in the crowd.
I'm curious,
Rick
Oh, I bet you've got a few that perceive a threat where there might not be one.UndercoverElephant said:
LOL
There will be none. The anti-war movement in England has jack squat to do with communism. I haven't even heard the word 'communism' mentioned for years. It is a truly American paranoia. We have a small band of people who sell a paper called "The Socialist Worker' but they are a tiny insignificant minority and really aren't connected with the peace movement. There is no fear of communism here. It just doesn't exist.
UndercoverElephant said:
LOL
There will be none. The anti-war movement in England has jack squat to do with communism. I haven't even heard the word 'communism' mentioned for years. It is a truly American paranoia. We have a small band of people who sell a paper called "The Socialist Worker' but they are a tiny insignificant minority and really aren't connected with the peace movement. There is no fear of communism here. It just doesn't exist.
subgenius said:
Oh, I bet you've got a few that perceive a threat where there might not be one.
What do you call that? Oh yeah, paranoia.
Cheers, and have a good day.
P.S. Update us on the overt or for that matter covert commie influence you find at the demo. (How do we know you're not a commie?)
Hope the weather's good for you. Have you guys solved that rainy London weather problem yet?![]()
He was only sleeping.panduh said:Ho Ho! I don't believe in ghosts, but the Spirit of McCarthy lives on![]()
panduh said:Ho Ho! I don't believe in ghosts, but the Spirit of McCarthy lives on![]()
You certainly don't mean like believing in bogeymen commies, do you?rikzilla said:
Take a hard backward glance at 50's America. McCarthy had a point...and history has proven that he was quite right about communist infiltration of the State Department. Of course McCarthy is only ever remembered for his Hollywood blacklist, and ridiculous and un-American demands that people name names (as if there was no legal presumption of innocence) of course that is the obvious wrong he did....and I will make no excuse for him. But in order to look objectively at history you have to look at what he was correct about.
To most leftists McCarthy is the boogeyman. Believing in the boogeyman tho is hardly what skeptics do.
-zilla
subgenius said:
You certainly don't mean like believing in bogeymen commies, do you?
Take a hard backward glance at 50's America. McCarthy had a point...and history has proven that he was quite right about communist infiltration of the State Department
Those that don't remember history are condemning us all to repeat it.Smalso said:
Which time was he right? He kept changing the numbers of which he had absolute proof. And why did he not name names himself. Nancy Davis, an actress who was later to become First Lady, was called before the committee. Defending her was the president of the Screen Actors' Guild, Ronald Reagan. Lucille Ball was called into the inquisition because of her past membership in a leftist organization. I was very young at the time this witch hunt was going on and my dad allowed me to stay up late to watch the Army-McCarthy hearings. I remember Edward R. Murrow's "See It Now" program on which he exposed McCarthy for what he was. It was this program, I believe, that caused quite a few Americans to say, "Hold on. What's going on here." When it was put-up-or-shut-up time, McCarthy had to shut up.