DJLegacy of LC Forum Proves Gravy Dead Wrong!

[DJLegacy2k5]

Im waiting for the Magical Gravy ... (looks at watch)

 

[XXX]

Chicken, Gravy...I'm getting hungry.

 

[milesalpha]

Wow I didnt see this done on the LC forums dozens of times...

Hi Pot Im Kettle...

You guys can dish it out but cant take it?

You should have some fun with this. Find a thread over on LC in which a JREF person acted like you have. In which they should have: spent the first 20 odd posts just insulting some other nut; insulted the nature of the forum; insulted people who will not "think" like they do; failed to provide a single cohesive argument (I sure hope your double naught secret agent website wasn't your best) despite repeatedly bragging how easy it would be to do so.

Ah well, at least we have learnt that you are a DJ, it explains a bit to me (due to my age-induced natural hatred of modern music, I can now infer that all that techno-pop has fried your brain cells ).

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

Tater-Tots too!

 

[dubfan]

Do you really think I came here to debate a whole site full of scared little kids?

I came here out of sheer boredom till Gravy and Dubfan get their scared asses to go on a "small little internet radio show" so they dont have their Ninja team to come in with all of this BS lol

We're not scared of you, boy. I agreed to be on Roxdog's show a MONTH AGO. And it took someone outing THREE of his lies to answer the questions put to him, and he has YET to send me the phone number.

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

Techno and Pop?...Not exactly...and I don't like all of this new hip hop garbage either...

But it's ok you tried your best to classify waht I do, thank you *cough cough*

 

[XXX]

Seriously though, so far you have implied that "there's no way THEY could have done this", without backing that statement up (or even elaborating on what exactly you meant), given only one real piece of "evidence" that is being discussed and looked into, and accused everyone of being close minded and unable to "connect" things...oh and told us all that you don't really care what we think and you're just here for entertainment.

And you wounder why it's hard to take you seriously? You're going to have to do better than this.

 

[kookbreaker]

Im waiting for the Magical Gravy ... (looks at watch)

I waded through three pages of you playing games and trying (badly) to insult everyone. There's nothing you have said that is worthy of a reply. You have produced no evidence, you have argued lame platitudes, you paved yourself a well-worn 'out' to run away back to your hidey-hole, you whined, you complained, you pulled lame stock phrases from your kit o' conspiracy junk, etc. etc.

You're not very good at this, are you?

 

[Hutch]

http://www.codenamegrillfire.com

OK, I read it. Obviously confirming his story will assist in your favor.

The DD Form 214 is a valid form, been around since forever in the Military, but the copy posted is hard to read (and even harder to copy), so I will try an obtain one this week for comparison purposes (noting that forms can change over 20-30 years, but when it comes to the US Army, not by very much.)

Mr. McNiven is very positive that this was a Congressionally mandated study and mentions the words "Congressional Commissioned" more than once in his website. I have therefore inquired of my Congressman if he or his staff could research and find if this study was done and if the results are releaseable to the public. I rather hope he does take me seriously and I will be able to report back to the group(s).

In regards to the "Northwest Drug Task Force" the only references I could find in Google were for local, i.e. state (Montana/Washington) organizations and no independent source tracking back to a DoD Task Force (which I bleieve would be illegal anyway, the US Army is enjoined by law (IIRC) from doing law officer work in the United States, unless directly linked to Military personnel...but I could be wrong.

Based on the above, I am not sure, DJ, that I completely accept the testimony of Mr. McNiven, and will await further information before entertaining the possibility that a 1976 study was an over-arching influence on what happed 25 years later.

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

You all are still under the impression that I bolted right over here to debate...I will set something up with Gravy when he gets online...I only started posting when I didn to reply to Paul Isaac Jr...Playing Mr stalker again.

 

[kookbreaker]

You all are still under the impression that I bolted right over here to debate...

While some were optimistic that you would, I had little doubt that you would be just like every other CT'er in the CT sack: Full of platitudes, kook links, weak insinuations, and absolutely no evidence.

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

While some were optimistic that you would, I had little doubt that you would be just like every other CT'er in the CT sack: Full of platitudes, kook links, weak insinuations, and absolutely no evidence.

Sort of like all you freaks over here that spend your days debating big-foot and evp, that come over to the LC boards to stir the pot?..

 

[Johnny Pixels]

Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages...the LC forums proudly brings to you the #1 9/11 Admin in the WOORRRRLLLLDDD...He is DJ Legacy!

(Crowd Goes Wild)

And yet the #1 9/11 admin has nothing to say on the matter of 9/11? How did you get to be #1 on a subject you refuse to talk about?

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

I will talk about it, when the single person involved wit hthe topic is here...

I did not come here for an unstructured debate against a group of ninja skeptics.

 

[Kage]

A flaw in the "I say I'm going to egg your house tonight and it is TPed instead" argument is that in this case they "say" they are going to egg another country 25 years ago and we wake up and a city within our own country is TPed 25 years later.


What the LCers believe is "I said I am going to egg a house in my neighborhood when I was 8" is sufficient evidense to justify my arrest when I am 23 for a burglary that occured in Japan.

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

Your also thinking on a much smaller scale on the time and effprt that would have to go into coordinating something on that large of a scale.

As far as I can think...It wouldn't be an over night thing.

 

[Apollyon]

I came here out of sheer boredom till Gravy and Dubfan get their scared asses to go on a "small little internet radio show" so they dont have their Ninja team to come in with all of this BS lol

You're bored?

Great! I guess that means you've nothing else to do and have finished with the incredibily footnoted and diligently researched Gravy debunking that you continually crow about but have yet to produce. (And you've finished up your 4 other simultaneous projects as well.)

So let's see it.

 

[kookbreaker]

Paranoia?...

I feel bad for everyone who died on 9/11 and you all choose to turn a blind eye to finding out what really happened to them.

I do not. I have listened to what the CTs have said. The difference is: I didn't just stop there. I did other research and foudn out there was a mountain between what the evidence indicated and what the CTs claim

Now, when you accuse us of being close-minded, what you are really doing is whining "Wah! You won't beleive my nonsense". Close minded is a different animal. Keep in mind we are actually listening to what you are saying, even though what you say is junk. The vast, vast, majority of people in this world would glance at your junk and walk away mutter that you should be in the funny farm.

"CT'ers at least want to know what happened,

No, they want to pretend they are super-slueths cracking the world's biggest case. They are living in a fantasy world where they are privy to seekrit nowledge that lets them know things the rest of the world does not.

Sadly, what they 'know' is nonsense.

they care more than someone who is just going to turn their back and make excuses to go with the official story.

Yeah, we have such lame excuses too: "All the evidence points to that conclusion", "Experts in their fields throughout the world agree this is what caused this to happen."and of course "CT'ers haven't got a brain cell with any understanding of science and technology between the lot of them."

..WHICH THE NIST ADMITS IS JUST A THEORY!

I see that the aforementioned brain cell is still missing. You might want to learn a bit about science before you embarass yourself this way: Bush loves guys like you who say 'This is just a theory'. It weakens the basis of scientific foundation and understanding and let's Bush's buddies creep things like 'Intelligent Design' into our schools. Thanks for paving the way with your ignorance.

So you say NIST's work is 'just a theory'? Well, it happens to be a theory based on the hundreds of experts, all of whom are drawing 100 to 3000 years worth of engineering experience in their respective. That give NIST the kind of 'theory' status in the same realm as the theory of gravity. Or do you consider gravity to be a plot by Bush as well?

 

[DJLegacy2k5]

You're bored?

Great! I guess that means you've nothing else to do and have finished with the incredibily footnoted and diligently researched Gravy debunking that you continually crow about but have yet to produce. (And you've finished up your 4 other simultaneous projects as well.)

So let's see it.

Yes 4 projects are underway...Sorry Im not going to be Gravy who looks for anything that might work for his arguement, kind of, sort of, and then add personal opinion to finihs up trying to make my point. Real research takes time.

And Ive only been talking about it for 2 weeks tops.

 

[Johnny Pixels]

I will talk about it, when the single person involved wit hthe topic is here...

I did not come here for an unstructured debate against a group of ninja skeptics.

Start a new thread while you are waiting. You pick the topic, structured debate ensues. Everyone stays on topic, anyone who doesn't, you simply ignore. Magic eh? Or doesn't the world's #1 9/11 admin know enough about 9/11 to debate it?