Did Jackie Kennedy kill JFK?

Anders Lindman said:
That's the difficult part of this theory I think. If it is true, then how the heck did they get Jackie to do it, and when was she trained to become an assassin? Was she trained already from childhood? Or much later on? :confused:

I have listened to some of Jackie's interviews, and she sounds a bit weird but a trained assassin? A mind control victim? I don't believe much in mind control of that kind.

And she had children together with JFK. The mere idea of her being the killer of JFK seems unbelievable, yet I think her actions in the Zapruder film look very suspicious.
Click to expand...

"Seems unbelievable."!!!??? The late John Peel was there,and took photographs.Perhaps he did it with a gimmicked camera.
 
dafydd; said:
"Seems unbelievable."!!!??? The late John Peel was there,and took photographs.Perhaps he did it with a gimmicked camera.
Click to expand...
Believe it or not, the legendary John Peel was actually in the Dallas police department during the interrogation of Oswald by the press on the 22nd. At the end of that famous shot that shows Jack Ruby lurking at the back of the hall, Peel and his mate can be seen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aHDJy0R8nQ
 
Come to think of it,where was Richard Nixon on the day of the assassination?
 
Cicero said:
Sure. And Jackie's miscarriage in 1955 and birth to a stillborn baby in 1956 were just cover-up stories about their murders to conceal that the children were actually fathered by Oleg Cassini.

BTW: Why would Jackie want to "look suspicious" during a public assassination were she knew there would be photographers along the route?
Click to expand...

There were very few people where the assassination happened. Mostly planted agents and other planted bystanders perhaps, such as: http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z342.jpg

And the Zapruder film was not shown to the public until several years later.
 
Anders Lindman said:
There were very few people where the assassination happened.
Click to expand...
What do you regard as "very few" in actual round numbers? What number would have made your version of the plot impossible to carry off and why?
Mostly planted agents and other planted bystanders perhaps, such as: http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z342.jpg
Click to expand...
I haven't researched this topic as throughly as you must have, so please can you tell us who those men are? I presume they must have been identified in the initial enquiries. Did they work for the security services? Are they still alive?
And the Zapruder film was not shown to the public until several years later.
Click to expand...
So what? What difference would it make to the plotters if they knew that a bystander was going to film the event, and what possible difference would it make if they knew in advance that the gruesome evidence would not be released to the general public for several years?
 
Jack by the hedge said:
What do you regard as "very few" in actual round numbers? What number would have made your version of the plot impossible to carry off and why?

I haven't researched this topic as throughly as you must have, so please can you tell us who those men are? I presume they must have been identified in the initial enquiries. Did they work for the security services? Are they still alive?

So what? What difference would it make to the plotters if they knew that a bystander was going to film the event, and what possible difference would it make if they knew in advance that the gruesome evidence would not be released to the general public for several years?
Click to expand...

I have only researched certain details about the JFK assassination. And not much. It was when I learned about the Jackie as the killer theory I started looking into it, and that was only some year or two ago. Then when I did web searches there was very little info about this theory, and today there is a lot more on the Internet about it.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I have only researched certain details about the JFK assassination. And not much. It was when I learned about the Jackie as the killer theory I started looking into it, and that was only some year or two ago. Then when I did web searches there was very little info about this theory, and today there is a lot more on the Internet about it.
Click to expand...

So may I interpret this as saying your answers are;
a) You haven't a clue
b) You haven't a clue
c) You haven't a clue

Does that fairly summarise your two-year investigation?
 
'Umbrella man' came forward many years later at the time of the HSCA, he was called Louie Steven Witt and he claims he was flapping his umbrella as a (very belated) and obscure protest against kennedy's fathers appeasement of Hitler in the 1930, the umbrella been like the one Chamberlain used to use. Or something.
 
The Zapruder film is not the only film of the shooting. Were the other films also 'supressed' ?

This is not a leading question - I honestly have no idea.
 
Worm said:
The Zapruder film is not the only film of the shooting. Were the other films also 'supressed' ?

This is not a leading question - I honestly have no idea.
Click to expand...

There are at least 3 other films that show some part of the shooting, all of which are and have been well known since 63. The only 'suppressed' film is the Babushka lady one, she can be seen filming it in some of the other films but that film has never surfaced for unknown reasons. Orville Nix, who took the next best film of the actual assassination, claimed frames had been removed from his film when he got it back from the FBI.
 
You'd have thought UPI would have noted that the film had been cut...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom