The second half of the book is a description of the diet and proposes various recipes. I did not read this in great detail. No doubt, the diet is good because it involves low-fat and more vegetables and more fruit. None of us would argue with that. The problem I have is the claims made for this diet are based on no scientific evidence and the simplistic blaming of the liver for a multitude of different ailments. I will quote again Dr Cabot's own words - "How can anyone know the benefits of a particular diet or therapy without evaluating its effects upon patients first". On this we agree. What we clearly don't agree on is what constitutes proper evaluation. There is overwhelming acceptance in the medical and scientific community that any new therapy or any new claim for an old therapy must be tested in a controlled trial, preferably in a double blind fashion. The words "controlled trial" do not appear anywhere in the book.
from Australian Skeptics feature on the "liver cleansing" diet