• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

Eldon, you are the only person on the forum who believes they are a slave, doesn't that tell you anything?
 
Hey Eldon. I'm curious. Why is it, do you suppose, that women in this country struggled so hard to be recognized as persons under the law? Did they chafe so much under the burden of freedom that they ached for the chains of the state? Please, I'd love to hear your take.

In case you need a reminder, I'm talking about these women. Fellow Albertans, no less.

http://www.abheritage.ca/famous5/achievements/persons_case.html
 
Eldon, you are the only person on the forum who believes they are a slave, doesn't that tell you anything?

Not really. I don't BELIEVE I am a slave. I BELIEVE that Government assumes that I am a slave, and treat me thusly. And, my detax program is to help myself, and others clever enough to understand, break that assumption of Government.

If the posters, and I expect that there are only two or three on this forum but posting under different handles, who are all defending Government imposed slavery, post diatribes against me, who teaches Canadians how to get out of that unlawfully imposed status, it leads me to think that so very many posters cannot be that dumb to so much enjoy and defend their slave status.

I really don't care what other posters believe - if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it most likely is a duck. If people are subservient to legislation that doesn't apply to a free will man, then they are slaves, whether they believe it or not. The only logical reason I see people not wishing to believe that Government sees them as slaves is if they are on the Government payroll, and enjoy being parasites living of the avails of the people of Canada.

I believe it was Sam Adams (USA) who said: "None are so enslaved as those who think they are free." As things are in Canada, with all tthe ignorant goons, none of us are free, but that doesn't mean that we cannot hold the ideals of freedom and rights, and do what we can to procure them.
 
It really is quite incredible how someone can be apparently convinced by so much complete nonsense about history, law and society in general.
 
Hey Eldon. I'm curious. Why is it, do you suppose, that women in this country struggled so hard to be recognized as persons under the law? Did they chafe so much under the burden of freedom that they ached for the chains of the state? Please, I'd love to hear your take.

In case you need a reminder, I'm talking about these women. Fellow Albertans, no less.

http://www.abheritage.ca/famous5/achievements/persons_case.html

Because they were ignorant of the fact that there is a different meaning of 'Person' in Law than there is is colloquial usage.

You quoted case law excerpts about me in your 858 post, that happened before I learned about the different meanings of 'person' and the 'name game' I now teach on my website.

You may have had some sort of electronic helmet placed upon your head that imparted your whole knowledge base that is in your mind in one big ZAP, but, for most of we human creatures, education is an ongoing situation, and starts with learning numbers and alphabet in the formal sense.

Your buddy, or alter-ego, Jack Foster keeps spouting the same crap, as if I were supposed to have claimed all knowledge of a scheme that has a beginning thousands of years ago, and then you/he criticizes me for what happened to me long before I had the knowledge acquired to know what was going on against me, such as the court cases and such in the 1990s. I has some, but not adequate knowledge of the name game until the early 2000s.

Should I post stories about you ******** in your pants at 3 years old? Should I therefore say, that you have no sense of sanitation, and cannot be relied upon to know how to use a flush toilet, because you **** in your pants?
 
It really is quite incredible how someone can be apparently convinced by so much complete nonsense about history, law and society in general.

And, it is ever so much more incredible that a man would be too stupid to know that he is seen as a slave by Government, and had that slave status imposed by a trickery of word meanings.

Do you believe that you have to obey the obligations imposed by other men, when there is no injured or hurt party, or damage to any other party's property?

Do you believe that you must pay over the fruit of your labour, which was gained by you expending your life (time on planet Earth), to a fictional entity, that then just deletes it from existence. Income tax pays for nothing? - a fact.

If so, then you believe it is OK to have slavery imposed upon you.
 
......i believe that most history, most law and most society...is nonsense.
is that incredible too?
Yes. Some history, some law and some society is/are nonsense. "Most" indicates a problem in your thinking.
 
Because they were ignorant of the fact that there is a different meaning of 'Person' in Law than there is is colloquial usage.
No. They were well aware of that fact. That fact was the very problem. Colloquially, "persons" included women. In law, "persons" excluded women. Thanks to their struggle, this is no longer the case.

Your ignorance is disgusting.

You quoted case law excerpts about me in your 858 post, that happened before I learned about the different meanings of 'person' and the 'name game' I now teach on my website.

You may have had some sort of electronic helmet placed upon your head that imparted your whole knowledge base that is in your mind in one big ZAP, but, for most of we human creatures, education is an ongoing situation, and starts with learning numbers and alphabet in the formal sense.

Your buddy, or alter-ego, Jack Foster keeps spouting the same crap, as if I were supposed to have claimed all knowledge of a scheme that has a beginning thousands of years ago, and then you/he criticizes me for what happened to me long before I had the knowledge acquired to know what was going on against me, such as the court cases and such in the 1990s. I has some, but not adequate knowledge of the name game until the early 2000s.

Should I post stories about you ******** in your pants at 3 years old? Should I therefore say, that you have no sense of sanitation, and cannot be relied upon to know how to use a flush toilet, because you **** in your pants?
Your name game is indistinguishable from the contents of my infant diaper. The courts have said as much. Over and over and over.

I guess you just don't learn.
 
Why are you so happy with what D'rok quoted? Do you like your slave status that much. Do you have a ring in your nose? Or, do you prefer a choke collar and leash?

My preferences regarding bondage implements are really none of your business. :p

But in all seriousness, I am quite content with my lot in life and what the money I shill out to the government pays for. I believe we've discussed this earlier on the board, but you've been gone for a while so maybe you forgot. I'm sure I can't even list everything I've enjoyed for this trade-off, but this year alone I can think of the roads I've driven on (the ones on the east coast too!), the neurologist I've visited, the physiotherapy, pediatrician, allergy tests, speech assessment, hearing tests, and immunizations for my child, the schools that I've visited and worked in, the parks I've visited, the snow being plowed off of the aforementioned streets... well, if you haven't got the idea by now, whatever.

I've said this before and I'll say it again. If you don't want to pay your taxes, then fine. But stop with the lame excuses, and you'd better not benefit from everything that the rest of us pay for. Maybe you don't do this, but your website encourages this and that is shameful. (Not that you have ever proven to us that your "method" works).
 
......i believe that most history, most law and most society...is nonsense.
is that incredible too?

I really don't know what your objectives are in your posts. Whatever you believe of disbelieve is your own 'free will' business.

In my posts with a history lesson, I attempt to show people that it isn't something I just drempt up last week. There is lots of info on the internet from credible sources, such as Fordham University and such, to back up my conclusions. If you don't wish to believe them or me, that is your 'free will' preference.
 
Yes. Some history, some law and some society is/are nonsense. "Most" indicates a problem in your thinking.

For sure, that is why Communist USSR had, and Communist China have 're-education' centres - for those who don't believe or accept the Communist propaganda. That's where people who had a bit of a free will mind get their thinking corrected.
 
For sure, that is why Communist USSR had, and Communist China have 're-education' centres - for those who don't believe or accept the Communist propaganda. That's where people who had a bit of a free will mind get their thinking corrected.
Shockingly, we agree.

Now, where are the Canadian re-education centres? How about forced labour camps? Hmmm? You've been convicted of crimes in Canada, yet the state has not subjected you to these things. You, in fact, are still free to believe whatever you wish about Canadian society. The worst you got was respectful dialogue form a trial judge. Go figure.
 
No. They were well aware of that fact. That fact was the very problem. Colloquially, "persons" included women. In law, "persons" excluded women. Thanks to their struggle, this is no longer the case.

Are you sure about that? Did you 'personally' question them on that subject?Or, are you assuming and conjecturing out of your own biased opinion? Those women won nothing, other than to be elevated from a 'non-person' to a 'person' - big deal! "Whopee!" She says. "Now, I can be a bona fide slave owned by the corporate Crown."


Your ignorance is disgusting.

Your name game is indistinguishable from the contents of my infant diaper. The courts have said as much. Over and over and over.
Ad hominum statement noted.

D'rok;6598164I guess you just don't learn.[/QUOTE said:
Learn what? That I should be thinking like a good obedient Communist slave?
 
And, it is ever so much more incredible that a man would be too stupid to know that he is seen as a slave by Government, and had that slave status imposed by a trickery of word meanings.
I suppose that if a person had trouble with language and context and a paranoid personality he might come to believe such poppycock.


Do you believe that you have to obey the obligations imposed by other men, when there is no injured or hurt party, or damage to any other party's property?
In the limited scope of the democratic government of a free society society I believe it is the preferred option.

Why do you think you can do whatever you like and enjoy the benefits of society while not contributing and whining about how oppressed you are?


Income tax pays for nothing? - a fact.
You appear to be using fact in a way that dictionaries are unfamiliar with.


If so, then you believe it is OK to have slavery imposed upon you.
You have no idea what I believe, it is quite clear, however, from your comments that what you believe has a very tenuous link to reality.
 
My preferences regarding bondage implements are really none of your business. :p

But in all seriousness, I am quite content with my lot in life and what the money I shill out to the government pays for. I believe we've discussed this earlier on the board, but you've been gone for a while so maybe you forgot. I'm sure I can't even list everything I've enjoyed for this trade-off, but this year alone I can think of the roads I've driven on (the ones on the east coast too!), the neurologist I've visited, the physiotherapy, pediatrician, allergy tests, speech assessment, hearing tests, and immunizations for my child, the schools that I've visited and worked in, the parks I've visited, the snow being plowed off of the aforementioned streets... well, if you haven't got the idea by now, whatever.

I've said this before and I'll say it again. If you don't want to pay your taxes, then fine. But stop with the lame excuses, and you'd better not benefit from everything that the rest of us pay for. Maybe you don't do this, but your website encourages this and that is shameful. (Not that you have ever proven to us that your "method" works).

Well, if you believe all that, (which is your free will right), then so be it. But, where you are in violation of the Creator's Law is your attempting to prevent or divert others from seeking their true God Given rights and freedom by your posts against me and my efforts at educating them on this issue, and that is likely because you don't realize that you have forfeited your rights and freedoms by your lack of knowledge.
 
Are you sure about that? Did you 'personally' question them on that subject?Or, are you assuming and conjecturing out of your own biased opinion? Those women won nothing, other than to be elevated from a 'non-person' to a 'person' - big deal! "Whopee!" She says. "Now, I can be a bona fide slave owned by the corporate Crown."

Your ignorance of history continues to astound.
 
I suppose that if a person had trouble with language and context and a paranoid personality he might come to believe such poppycock.

You refer to yourself, of course?

In the limited scope of the democratic government of a free society society I believe it is the preferred option.

It would be, if the government were at the top level of administration, and wasn't an incorporated body owned by the Holy Roman Empire. Your limited understanding of how the present system is created and arranged leaves you with far to simplistic a view to criticize others on their superior knowledge of the subject.

Why do you think you can do whatever you like and enjoy the benefits of society while not contributing and whining about how oppressed you are?

Because it was Creator God who created me and put me on Planet Earth to enjoy 'free will status'. The Government (a group of men) had nothing to do with either. And, Creator God did not creat fictional corporations, unless you consider the Pope to be god - which he thinks he is, apparently.


You appear to be using fact in a way that dictionaries are unfamiliar with.

You dangle your participle. That's a fact.


You have no idea what I believe, it is quite clear, however, from your comments that what you believe has a very tenuous link to reality.

Why would you have such an outburst of ego that you think I care what you think or believe? At least, it is a form of 'reality'.
 

Back
Top Bottom