Hear, hear.![]()
Why are you so happy with what D'rok quoted? Do you like your slave status that much. Do you have a ring in your nose? Or, do you prefer a choke collar and leash?
Hear, hear.![]()
Eldon, you are the only person on the forum who believes they are a slave, doesn't that tell you anything?
Hey Eldon. I'm curious. Why is it, do you suppose, that women in this country struggled so hard to be recognized as persons under the law? Did they chafe so much under the burden of freedom that they ached for the chains of the state? Please, I'd love to hear your take.
In case you need a reminder, I'm talking about these women. Fellow Albertans, no less.
http://www.abheritage.ca/famous5/achievements/persons_case.html
It really is quite incredible how someone can be apparently convinced by so much complete nonsense about history, law and society in general.
It really is quite incredible how someone can be apparently convinced by so much complete nonsense about history, law and society in general.
Yes. Some history, some law and some society is/are nonsense. "Most" indicates a problem in your thinking.......i believe that most history, most law and most society...is nonsense.
is that incredible too?
No. They were well aware of that fact. That fact was the very problem. Colloquially, "persons" included women. In law, "persons" excluded women. Thanks to their struggle, this is no longer the case.Because they were ignorant of the fact that there is a different meaning of 'Person' in Law than there is is colloquial usage.
Your name game is indistinguishable from the contents of my infant diaper. The courts have said as much. Over and over and over.You quoted case law excerpts about me in your 858 post, that happened before I learned about the different meanings of 'person' and the 'name game' I now teach on my website.
You may have had some sort of electronic helmet placed upon your head that imparted your whole knowledge base that is in your mind in one big ZAP, but, for most of we human creatures, education is an ongoing situation, and starts with learning numbers and alphabet in the formal sense.
Your buddy, or alter-ego, Jack Foster keeps spouting the same crap, as if I were supposed to have claimed all knowledge of a scheme that has a beginning thousands of years ago, and then you/he criticizes me for what happened to me long before I had the knowledge acquired to know what was going on against me, such as the court cases and such in the 1990s. I has some, but not adequate knowledge of the name game until the early 2000s.
Should I post stories about you ******** in your pants at 3 years old? Should I therefore say, that you have no sense of sanitation, and cannot be relied upon to know how to use a flush toilet, because you **** in your pants?
Why are you so happy with what D'rok quoted? Do you like your slave status that much. Do you have a ring in your nose? Or, do you prefer a choke collar and leash?
......i believe that most history, most law and most society...is nonsense.
is that incredible too?
Yes. Some history, some law and some society is/are nonsense. "Most" indicates a problem in your thinking.
Shockingly, we agree.For sure, that is why Communist USSR had, and Communist China have 're-education' centres - for those who don't believe or accept the Communist propaganda. That's where people who had a bit of a free will mind get their thinking corrected.
No. They were well aware of that fact. That fact was the very problem. Colloquially, "persons" included women. In law, "persons" excluded women. Thanks to their struggle, this is no longer the case.
Ad hominum statement noted.Your ignorance is disgusting.
Your name game is indistinguishable from the contents of my infant diaper. The courts have said as much. Over and over and over.
D'rok;6598164I guess you just don't learn.[/QUOTE said:Learn what? That I should be thinking like a good obedient Communist slave?
I suppose that if a person had trouble with language and context and a paranoid personality he might come to believe such poppycock.And, it is ever so much more incredible that a man would be too stupid to know that he is seen as a slave by Government, and had that slave status imposed by a trickery of word meanings.
In the limited scope of the democratic government of a free society society I believe it is the preferred option.Do you believe that you have to obey the obligations imposed by other men, when there is no injured or hurt party, or damage to any other party's property?
You appear to be using fact in a way that dictionaries are unfamiliar with.Income tax pays for nothing? - a fact.
You have no idea what I believe, it is quite clear, however, from your comments that what you believe has a very tenuous link to reality.If so, then you believe it is OK to have slavery imposed upon you.
My preferences regarding bondage implements are really none of your business.
But in all seriousness, I am quite content with my lot in life and what the money I shill out to the government pays for. I believe we've discussed this earlier on the board, but you've been gone for a while so maybe you forgot. I'm sure I can't even list everything I've enjoyed for this trade-off, but this year alone I can think of the roads I've driven on (the ones on the east coast too!), the neurologist I've visited, the physiotherapy, pediatrician, allergy tests, speech assessment, hearing tests, and immunizations for my child, the schools that I've visited and worked in, the parks I've visited, the snow being plowed off of the aforementioned streets... well, if you haven't got the idea by now, whatever.
I've said this before and I'll say it again. If you don't want to pay your taxes, then fine. But stop with the lame excuses, and you'd better not benefit from everything that the rest of us pay for. Maybe you don't do this, but your website encourages this and that is shameful. (Not that you have ever proven to us that your "method" works).
Are you sure about that? Did you 'personally' question them on that subject?Or, are you assuming and conjecturing out of your own biased opinion? Those women won nothing, other than to be elevated from a 'non-person' to a 'person' - big deal! "Whopee!" She says. "Now, I can be a bona fide slave owned by the corporate Crown."
I suppose that if a person had trouble with language and context and a paranoid personality he might come to believe such poppycock.
In the limited scope of the democratic government of a free society society I believe it is the preferred option.
Why do you think you can do whatever you like and enjoy the benefits of society while not contributing and whining about how oppressed you are?
You appear to be using fact in a way that dictionaries are unfamiliar with.
You have no idea what I believe, it is quite clear, however, from your comments that what you believe has a very tenuous link to reality.
Your ignorance of history continues to astound.