• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

Nothing to do with the Detax Canada detax program

In fact, I have always had warnings on my website regarding such programs as this one to which this Doctor fell victim. In fact, I have identified most as being 'sting operations' established by CRA, or some organization higher up in the enclaves of the Vatican despotism system, such as the Jesuits or Knights of Malta.

No True Scotsman, flawlessly transitioning into We Have Always Been At War With Eurasia, and then a perfectly executed dismount into They Are All Out To Get Me.

That, my friend, is worth at least a 9.8, maybe a 9.9.
 
No. I am a long time student of the URANTIA Book, so, I really have nothing to do with Christian beliefs, and little interest in the Bible, except for a few philosophical passages that are of a positive nature.

Did Gauvreau try to push any of that Christian Identity stuff on you when you guys were talking taxes?

(thanks for your detailed reply btw!)
 
For those who are ignorant of the facts regarding the king/priesthood of the Vatican 'Red Robed Priests of Isis', it ruled Egypt for some 10,000 years, until about 1500 BC.

Whups. Missed this gem the first time around.

So the 'Red Robed Priests of Isis' ruled Egypt starting in 11,500BCE?

That's really interesting, considering that we have no evidence whatsoever of any long-term human habitation earlier than 8,000 BCE. The earliest Egyptian agricultural settlements known date from only about 5200 BCE. Before that, we have evidence of neolithic hunter-gatherers dating back another three thousand years or so, which still leaves your Priests of Fashion hanging for more than 3,000 years.

Of course, since Isis herself only dates back (as far as we can tell) to the Fifth Dynasty (2494 to 2345 BC), a rational human being would conclude that the Neolithic tribes were not ruled by priests of a goddess who wouldn't be invented for five thousand years.

But I'm sure you'd not going to let multi-thousand-year anachronisms stop you. After all, the idea that a group of priests would worship a goddess who wouldn't be invented for five thousand years is, by your standards, rather credible.

At least in comparison to the rest of your "ideas."
 
Whups. Missed this gem the first time around.

So the 'Red Robed Priests of Isis' ruled Egypt starting in 11,500BCE?

That's really interesting, considering that we have no evidence whatsoever of any long-term human habitation earlier than 8,000 BCE. The earliest Egyptian agricultural settlements known date from only about 5200 BCE. Before that, we have evidence of neolithic hunter-gatherers dating back another three thousand years or so, which still leaves your Priests of Fashion hanging for more than 3,000 years.

Of course, since Isis herself only dates back (as far as we can tell) to the Fifth Dynasty (2494 to 2345 BC), a rational human being would conclude that the Neolithic tribes were not ruled by priests of a goddess who wouldn't be invented for five thousand years.

But I'm sure you'd not going to let multi-thousand-year anachronisms stop you. After all, the idea that a group of priests would worship a goddess who wouldn't be invented for five thousand years is, by your standards, rather credible.

At least in comparison to the rest of your "ideas."
Spoilsport.
 
No True Scotsman, flawlessly transitioning into We Have Always Been At War With Eurasia, and then a perfectly executed dismount into They Are All Out To Get Me.

That, my friend, is worth at least a 9.8, maybe a 9.9.
He has set the woo-bar rather high. It will be a difficult score to beat.
 
No True Scotsman, flawlessly transitioning into We Have Always Been At War With Eurasia, and then a perfectly executed dismount into They Are All Out To Get Me.

That, my friend, is worth at least a 9.8, maybe a 9.9.



Dude, good first post!


So, Jesuit or Knight of Malta?


:D
 
Originally Posted by bikerdruid
income tax is already deducted from my pensions cheque.
the only way i can get any back is to file.
and i always get money back. sometimes a lot.

since i paid into pension my entire working life and had no choice, you can call me a parasite if you wish.....
however, if you claim to pay no income tax....
and ever access the medical system,
or call the RCMP,
or use a passport to travel to another country,.
or accept anything form the government, ever.....you are the parasite.



And, when you get your rotten bread and pig guts as your 'benefit' from your slave master, you get on your knees and say: "Thank you Massah! Youze a mighty good Massah!" Must be nice to know in your heart that you are a son of the Father in Heaven, and yet have to 'suck-hole' and 'brown-nose' some fictional entity, and those who are evil enough to operate the levers within that fictional body. What a sad diminution of your real status within this Universe. Where is that Chinese man who stood in front of the tanks on Tienanmen Square a few years ago. Are there no Canadians with that level of bravery and dedication to cause? Resistance against CRA thugs and their Communist income tax (see 2nd Plank of the Communist Manifesto - criminalgovernment.com/docs/planks.html ), and the Communist thugs driving those tanks would seem to be very comparable to me.

And, if you have the honesty to peruse the US GRACE COMMISSION REPORT, you will see their statement: Quote: "In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government." unquote And, don't bother spewing the retort that the report only applies to the USA. You'd better believe - it applies to Canada as well.

did you even read my post?
your answer is irrelevant to what i said.:confused:
...and please don't assume that i'm christian.

btw...my pension is hardly 'rotten bread and pig guts'.
i live quite well on a healthy pension.
 
Last edited:
Thus, the 'Greased Pig' is the god of the Vatican, and the symbol of that is the 'peter', the giant penis that stands in the vagina in the middle of the square that is blessed every morning by the Pope.

Oh crap, we've been rumbled!

EldonG said:
I, sir, do not have to back up anything I say or write to a shill.

Of course, anybody who disagrees with or contests you is a shill, right?
 
You do realize (speaking to everyone in this thread) that this thread is becoming awfully weird
 
I, sir, do not have to back up anything I say or write to a shill.
Last I checked, shills were paid. I'm not being paid to ask you to back up your claims.

But, until you prove me wrong by detailed facts, the truth of my statements stand.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. You made a claim—you back it up.

Otherwise, I could just claim you owe me $1,000 and force you to disprove it. And then claim that a lack of evidence (e.g. you not being able to find anything written down anywhere saying you don't owe me $1,000) is proof you do, and demand you pay up.

I could give you her name, address and e-mail, but since I detect that you are not an honest researcher, but just a troll and/or shill, you can do your own research, as she did.
Again, you claimed that all 50,000 of the original shares of the Bank of Canada were sold to the U.S. Federal Reserve, converted to non-voting shares (how?), then sold back to Canada. But you provided no credible evidence to support this claim, aside from a self-published book that you no longer have in your possession.

But in any event, the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and is now a public institution.
 
Is that St. Peter's? :jaw-dropp (certainly ain't saltpeter; Christ wasn't kidding about him being a rock; must be quite taxing to maintain, without getting light-headed)
"On this rock I will build my church"

Is that Bible code for pupr-sticking?

Where's Ducky when you need him.
 
Ah, you have the real tax avoidance scheme.

Good to know.

No. Not tax avoidance. Not tax evasion. Not a tax loophole.

I just teach people that they are a free will living adult man, male or female. And, that the income tax only applies to a fictional entity called a 'person'. And, it has already been discussed that 'person' comes from the Latin, 'persona' - the fictional role played by an actor.

Thus, I teach that one is NOT subject to the income tax, or any legislated act of any level of Government, as they all specifically state that they apply to 'persons'.

However, Government would have us think, and unfortunately, have been quite successful in convincing the vast number of the population, that they are part of a combined fictional entity where the Crown or State owned legal name is the principal property, and the adult man who ignorantly identifies him or her self as being one and the same as that legal name, and thus compose the 'person' entity upon which they then impose their statutes and the harvesting of the fruits of their labour because of their slave status..
 

Back
Top Bottom