• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.

The genius who said that my (native-born American) argument was "inviolate proof that the Jesuit program of 'dumbing down' of the Canadian population in their control of school curriculum and textbooks" honors us with a short post building up his own intelligence and ego compared with us mortals and then he misspells "puerile."

:i:

PS - When you put stuff in quotes, you should make it a quote. No one here said "damage control goons" but you, smart guy.
 
Is intelligence a roadblock to proper spelling and grammar?

hey, I just read page 1 and this page and its been a hoot. Especially Eldon's last post above.

Yep, no better proof that you are right and that TPTB are sending 'goons' to stifle your clarion call, than to have dozens of people tell you that you are wrong.
 
I'd say self supporting delusions rock!


He knows he's on to something big, because everywhere he goes, he runs into people who tell him he's insane.

Ah but he isn't insane he's just so mistaken and misoriented he SEEMS insane - just a plain old ID ten T problem.
 
Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.

Why do these cult kooks always seem to think that spewing delusions of grandeur and over the top pompous arrogance covers up the fact that they are trying to peddle lies and snake oil???
 
If there were a legal way to avoid pay income taxes or way that I would be positive that I wouldn't get caught, I wouldn't pay a penny (although to be honest I have under-reported my income by a lot when I could- nothing the IRS could prove of course). Because **** the federal government. I would rather have that money myself. But fortunately, I am not insane and/or retarded and realize that the federal government of the USA does indeed have the authority to collect income taxes. And even if the government of the USA technically does not have the authority to collect income taxes (which, it of course does), it absolutely has the physical power to either make you pay or ruin your life. And I don't know about you people, but I would rather pay some money than have the feds on my back.
 
If there were a legal way to avoid pay income taxes or way that I would be positive that I wouldn't get caught, I wouldn't pay a penny (although to be honest I have under-reported my income by a lot when I could- nothing the IRS could prove of course). Because **** the federal government. I would rather have that money myself. But fortunately, I am not insane and/or retarded and realize that the federal government of the USA does indeed have the authority to collect income taxes. And even if the government of the USA technically does not have the authority to collect income taxes (which, it of course does), it absolutely has the physical power to either make you pay or ruin your life. And I don't know about you people, but I would rather pay some money than have the feds on my back.

So you don't use roads? Emergency services? Benefit from living in a country (and economy) protected by a strong military? Appreciate regulation of polluters and the safety of the air you breathe, the water you drink, the food you eat and the medicines you take?

What are you? A hippy?
 
A very small percentage of the income taxes I pay to the feds is actually used for stuff I find useful. The vast majority is pissed away. So yes, if there is a way that I could keep it without going to prison, I would do it.
 
Nah! It is just that I find no one participating in this thread with the high intelligence of myself, and thus none worthy of my further responses.

Such purile minds bore me! However, the response from so many 'damage control goons' does suggest to me that I, and my Detax Canada website, am obviously a burr under some big shot's saddle.

I am not a bigshot of any kind. As I said my work is helping poor people. The opposite of a bigshot.

And I am happy to give the detax Canada website some publicity. I think most people find it pretty comical on a number of levels. The content is obviously hilarious, but so is the style, the crazy colours, the one super long page, the classic amateur web page style from the mid 90s.

And another point to think about... If there were any merit to these claims who would be the first people to jump all over it? Lawyers. They are the one group who has the means to dispute this and is always quick to jump all over any kind of loophole in the law. The fact that it is always homemade web pages that promote these theories and there are never any lawyers who take advantage of these great "loopholes" is pretty much proof alone that the theories are bunk.
 
And another point to think about... If there were any merit to these claims who would be the first people to jump all over it? Lawyers. They are the one group who has the means to dispute this and is always quick to jump all over any kind of loophole in the law.

Not to mention the fact that they probably have more to benefit from being able to escape taxes on their typically much larger than median salaries.

I remember a conversation I had with my eye doctor a while back about then-experimental laser surgery. He pointed out that he still wore glasses even though he could get the surgery done for free as a professional courtesy.

I found that a deeply compelling argument against.
 
Second, first would be accountants ;)

And considering, that every couple of years either a lawyer or an accountant identifies a clever loop in the tax law and sneaks a reduction in his tax through that the NRS promptly closes for the next year, it's not like they aren't interested. ;)
 
Not to mention the fact that they probably have more to benefit from being able to escape taxes on their typically much larger than median salaries.

I remember a conversation I had with my eye doctor a while back about then-experimental laser surgery. He pointed out that he still wore glasses even though he could get the surgery done for free as a professional courtesy.

I found that a deeply compelling argument against.

Did you check his glasses had prescription lenses and not just clear glass?
 
If there were a legal way to avoid pay income taxes or way that I would be positive that I wouldn't get caught, I wouldn't pay a penny (although to be honest I have under-reported my income by a lot when I could- nothing the IRS could prove of course). Because **** the federal government. I would rather have that money myself. But fortunately, I am not insane and/or retarded and realize that the federal government of the USA does indeed have the authority to collect income taxes. And even if the government of the USA technically does not have the authority to collect income taxes (which, it of course does), it absolutely has the physical power to either make you pay or ruin your life. And I don't know about you people, but I would rather pay some money than have the feds on my back.

Just go to the DetaxCanada webpage linked by OP in the opening post on this thread, and download the file called "The Name Game Blog". That will explain the mechanism used by the IRS to steal the fruits of your labor with impunity and without considering your human rights.
 
I am not a bigshot of any kind. As I said my work is helping poor people. The opposite of a bigshot.

And I am happy to give the detax Canada website some publicity. I think most people find it pretty comical on a number of levels. The content is obviously hilarious, but so is the style, the crazy colours, the one super long page, the classic amateur web page style from the mid 90s.

And another point to think about... If there were any merit to these claims who would be the first people to jump all over it? Lawyers. They are the one group who has the means to dispute this and is always quick to jump all over any kind of loophole in the law. The fact that it is always homemade web pages that promote these theories and there are never any lawyers who take advantage of these great "loopholes" is pretty much proof alone that the theories are bunk.

Well, I am glad that I provided you with some comedy, even though there apparently is little hope that I could instigate any thought of helping you to seek a remedy for your slave status. Enjoy the rattle of your chains.

Your 'help' for those caught up in the distress of the legal system reminds me of the story of a fellow who comes out of the fast food restaurant with a sack of Big Macs, double fries, and a large mikkshake. Outside is a homeless man begging, and says the the fellow. I haven't had anything to eat in 2 days. The fellow with the sack of food says to the homeless man: "I sure wish I had your will power to resist food."

And, the 'loopholes' to which you refer, are outside the fiction world in which lawyers exist, and have their being. The DetaxCanada detax program is NOT a loophole in the legal system laws. It is the right of a free will adult man to exercise his own unalienable property right, with a man's primary property being his labour produced by his own mind, and through his physical body.
 
Last edited:
Second, first would be accountants ;)

A few years ago, Parliament/the corporate Crown enacted an amendment that made all lawyers and accountants pseudo-CRA agents, under penalty of a heavy fine for giving any meaningful advice to the Canadian people on how to avoid or escape taxation. So much for any lawyers or accountants advising or helping find loopholes , let alone advising people how to get out from under the imposed 'slave status', and the 'harvesting of the friuts of the labour of Crown owned slaves' - income tax.
 
And considering, that every couple of years either a lawyer or an accountant identifies a clever loop in the tax law and sneaks a reduction in his tax through that the NRS promptly closes for the next year, it's not like they aren't interested. ;)

You give another good reason why there is no help with income tax issues coming from lawyers or accountants.

The DetaxCanada program teaches you how to get out from under the slave status status imposed upon you by the corporate Crown of the City of London - yes, the Queen of GB is just an agent for the corporate Crown of the City of London - as all British Monarchs have been since the treaty between Pope Innocent III and King John of 1213 - that made the Pontiff of Rome 'Overlord' of England, and that is not a Roman Catholic thing - it is a secular/worldly rulership that has not changed since that time. Don't believe me? GOOGLE "King John and Innocent III". The information is on RC websites.

The DetaxCanada program has absolutely no reference to 'so-called' loopholes. It is just a matter of reality over fiction.

But then, I am forgetting... Those posting here know a lot more than anyone else about such matters.....
 
I thought you said you were done here, Eldon.

Removed breach. Read Rule 10 and abide by it.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A few years ago, Parliament/the corporate Crown enacted an amendment that made all lawyers and accountants pseudo-CRA agents, under penalty of a heavy fine for giving any meaningful advice to the Canadian people on how to avoid or escape taxation. So much for any lawyers or accountants advising or helping find loopholes , let alone advising people how to get out from under the imposed 'slave status', and the 'harvesting of the friuts of the labour of Crown owned slaves' - income tax.

Evidence?

That means a direct cite of the law involved, from a reliable source- not an unsupported assertion spread by cybermetastasis from one CT Web site to another?
 

Back
Top Bottom